[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [llvm] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

koachan wrote: Okay, new PR is at https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78280. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77196 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/l

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [llvm] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

s-barannikov wrote: Yes, sure https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77196 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [llvm] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

koachan wrote: Uh oh, seems like I couldn't merge it with the tool either... Guess I'll open a new PR to merge this, would that be okay? @brad0 @s-barannikov https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77196 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-br

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [llvm] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

koachan wrote: Lemme see if I can do it I used `spr` to make the PRs, it should still be mergeable from there, I think? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77196 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://list

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [llvm] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

brad0 wrote: I intentionally restored the branch as I only noticed after the merge that the target branch was set incorrectly. It wasn't merged into the LLVM repo. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77196 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list ll

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [llvm] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

https://github.com/brad0 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77196 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [llvm] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

https://github.com/s-barannikov approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77196 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [llvm] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py +; RUN: llc < %s -relocation-model=pic -mtriple=sparc | FileCheck --check-prefix=SPARC %s +; RUN: llc < %s -relocation-model=pic -mtriple=sparcv9 | FileCheck --check-prefix=SPARC64 %s

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [llvm] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

https://github.com/koachan updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77196 >From f4830825ebea96f71fb1b9d1f1192114291b093c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Koakuma Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 10:35:24 +0700 Subject: [PATCH] Add nounwind to test cases Created using spr 1.3.4 --- llvm/test/Code

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [llvm] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

@@ -234,8 +244,15 @@ void SparcAsmPrinter::LowerGETPCXAndEmitMCInsts(const MachineInstr *MI, // add , %o7, OutStreamer->emitLabel(StartLabel); - MCOperand Callee = createPCXCallOP(EndLabel, OutContext); - EmitCall(*OutStreamer, Callee, STI); + if (!STI.getTargetTri

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [llvm] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

https://github.com/s-barannikov edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77196 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [llvm] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py +; RUN: llc < %s -relocation-model=pic -mtriple=sparc | FileCheck --check-prefix=SPARC %s +; RUN: llc < %s -relocation-model=pic -mtriple=sparcv9 | FileCheck --check-prefix=SPARC64 %s

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [llvm] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

@@ -118,9 +126,11 @@ def : Proc<"ma2480", [FeatureLeon, LeonCASA]>; def : Proc<"ma2485", [FeatureLeon, LeonCASA]>; def : Proc<"ma2x8x", [FeatureLeon, LeonCASA]>; def : Proc<"v9", [FeatureV9]>; -def : Proc<"ultrasparc", [FeatureV9, Fe

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [llvm] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

@@ -234,8 +244,15 @@ void SparcAsmPrinter::LowerGETPCXAndEmitMCInsts(const MachineInstr *MI, // add , %o7, OutStreamer->emitLabel(StartLabel); - MCOperand Callee = createPCXCallOP(EndLabel, OutContext); - EmitCall(*OutStreamer, Callee, STI); + if (!STI.getTargetTri

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [llvm] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

@@ -234,8 +244,15 @@ void SparcAsmPrinter::LowerGETPCXAndEmitMCInsts(const MachineInstr *MI, // add , %o7, s-barannikov wrote: Please update the comment to include the rdpc case. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77196 ___

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [llvm] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-sparc Author: Koakuma (koachan) Changes On 64-bit target, prefer usng RDPC over CALL to get the value of %pc. This is faster on modern processors (Niagara T1 and newer) and avoids polluting the processor's predictor state. The old behavior of us

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [llvm] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

https://github.com/koachan created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77196 On 64-bit target, prefer usng RDPC over CALL to get the value of %pc. This is faster on modern processors (Niagara T1 and newer) and avoids polluting the processor's predictor state. The old behavior of using a f