https://github.com/jroelofs updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73687
>From aeb39b92bbd7670fb8c6b9e76a456a92199691b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Roelofs
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 12:23:46 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] adjust tests per review feedback
Created using spr 1.3.4
---
https://github.com/jroelofs updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73687
>From aeb39b92bbd7670fb8c6b9e76a456a92199691b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Roelofs
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 12:23:46 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] adjust tests per review feedback
Created using spr 1.3.4
---
https://github.com/jroelofs updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73687
>From aeb39b92bbd7670fb8c6b9e76a456a92199691b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Roelofs
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 12:23:46 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] adjust tests per review feedback
Created using spr 1.3.4
---
https://github.com/jroelofs updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73687
>From aeb39b92bbd7670fb8c6b9e76a456a92199691b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Roelofs
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 12:23:46 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] adjust tests per review feedback
Created using spr 1.3.4
---
@@ -5408,7 +5408,9 @@ considered inline.
Not all targets support this attribute. ELF target support depends on both the
linker and runtime linker, and is available in at least lld 4.0 and later,
binutils 2.20.1 and later, glibc v2.11.1 and later, and FreeBSD 9.1 and later.
@@ -3,6 +3,10 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i386-unknown-linux-gnu -fsanitize=thread -O2
-emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SAN
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i386-unknown-linux-gnu -fsanitize=address -O2
-emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SAN
// RUN:
https://github.com/jroelofs updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73687
>From aeb39b92bbd7670fb8c6b9e76a456a92199691b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Roelofs
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 12:23:46 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] adjust tests per review feedback
Created using spr 1.3.4
---
jroelofs wrote:
> Do you need an OS version check here?
I don't think so, at least not yet. With #73686, support for this is entirely
up to the compiler.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73687
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
tahonermann wrote:
Added @erichkeane as a reviewer.
I recommend extending test coverage to all of the following tests:
- `clang/test/CodeGenCXX/externc-ifunc-resolver.cpp`
- `clang/test/SemaCXX/externc-ifunc-resolver.cpp`
- `clang/test/CodeGen/ifunc.c` (already done)
-
echristo wrote:
Do you need an OS version check here?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73687
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/jroelofs updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73687
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/jroelofs updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73687
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/jroelofs updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73687
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Jon Roelofs (jroelofs)
Changes
Unlike ELF targets, MachO does not support the same kind of dynamic symbol
resolution at load time. Instead, the corresponding MachO feature resolves
symbols lazily on first call.
---
Full diff:
https://github.com/jroelofs created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73687
Unlike ELF targets, MachO does not support the same kind of dynamic symbol
resolution at load time. Instead, the corresponding MachO feature resolves
symbols lazily on first call.
15 matches
Mail list logo