[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [llvm][AArch64] Do not inline a function with different signing scheme. (#80642) (PR #82743)

2024-02-26 Thread Tom Stellard via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/tstellar closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82743 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [llvm][AArch64] Do not inline a function with different signing scheme. (#80642) (PR #82743)

2024-02-26 Thread Nick Desaulniers via llvm-branch-commits
nickdesaulniers wrote: (also, I think you can use `/backport ` comment in any issue and llvmbot will generate these PRs for you.) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82743 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org h

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [llvm][AArch64] Do not inline a function with different signing scheme. (#80642) (PR #82743)

2024-02-26 Thread Nick Desaulniers via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nickdesaulniers approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82743 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [llvm][AArch64] Do not inline a function with different signing scheme. (#80642) (PR #82743)

2024-02-26 Thread Nick Desaulniers via llvm-branch-commits
nickdesaulniers wrote: LGTM https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82743 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [llvm][AArch64] Do not inline a function with different signing scheme. (#80642) (PR #82743)

2024-02-23 Thread Tom Stellard via llvm-branch-commits
tstellar wrote: @nickdesaulniers What do you think about backporting this? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82743 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bran

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [llvm][AArch64] Do not inline a function with different signing scheme. (#80642) (PR #82743)

2024-02-23 Thread via llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms Author: Dani (DanielKristofKiss) Changes f the signing scheme is different that maybe the functions assumes different behaviours and dangerous to inline them without analysing them. This should be a rare case. --- Full diff: https://g

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [llvm][AArch64] Do not inline a function with different signing scheme. (#80642) (PR #82743)

2024-02-23 Thread via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/DanielKristofKiss created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82743 f the signing scheme is different that maybe the functions assumes different behaviours and dangerous to inline them without analysing them. This should be a rare case. >From f70e8da5f991f003f4af59c8

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [llvm][AArch64] Do not inline a function with different signing scheme. (#80642) (PR #82743)

2024-02-23 Thread via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/DanielKristofKiss milestoned https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82743 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits