xry111 wrote:
I have some doubt about this change.
To me if the user requests `xvpermi.q` via the `loongarch_lasx_xvpermi_q`
intrinsic, we should give her/him the `xvpermi.q` instruction. If (s)he is
passing an invalid operand then (s)he is invoking the undefined behavior
herself/himself and
SixWeining wrote:
> I have some doubt about this change.
>
> To me if the user requests `xvpermi.q` via the `loongarch_lasx_xvpermi_q`
> intrinsic, we should give her/him the `xvpermi.q` instruction. If (s)he is
> passing an invalid operand then (s)he is invoking the undefined behavior
> hers
xen0n wrote:
For the record, based on the principle of "explicit is better than implicit"
that generally holds, I'd favor an approach where such compile-time-verifiable
out-of-range operands are given compile-time errors, or we should just pass
through the value unmodified. Otherwise the intri
https://github.com/SixWeining closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83540
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
SixWeining wrote:
> For the record, based on the principle of "explicit is better than implicit"
> that generally holds, I'd favor an approach where such
> compile-time-verifiable out-of-range operands are given compile-time errors,
> or we should just pass through the value unmodified. Otherw
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83540
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83540
Backport d7c80bba698bded48c1df4b4bb7424a181aa6195
Requested by: @leecheechen
>From 3009ba6242d2e334b499a36d2706c0a4c004cfeb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: leecheechen
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:38:11 +0800
Subje
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-loongarch
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport d7c80bba698bded48c1df4b4bb7424a181aa6195
Requested by: @leecheechen
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83540.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Target/LoongArc
