[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] release/20.x: [flang] Exempt construct entities from SAVE check for PURE (#131383) (PR #137752)

https://github.com/eugeneepshteyn approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137752 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] release/20.x: [flang] Exempt construct entities from SAVE check for PURE (#131383) (PR #137752)

eugeneepshteyn wrote: I have no opinion. If you need it there and it works, go a head and merge... https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137752 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] release/20.x: [flang] Fix missed case of symbol renaming in module file generation (#132475) (PR #133223)

https://github.com/eugeneepshteyn approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133223 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [flang] Consolidate copy-in/copy-out determination in evaluate framework (PR #155810)

eugeneepshteyn wrote: > Can it be more made smaller to specifically target the issue at hand? No, these changes must go in together. In any case, the old PR was submitted a few weeks ago and at least has advantage of being used. I wouldn't have the same level of confidence for any new PR and w