[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34972] New: frontend optimization of constant aggregate initializers can pessimize final code

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34972 Bug ID: 34972 Summary: frontend optimization of constant aggregate initializers can pessimize final code Product: clang Version: trunk Hardware: All OS: All

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34971] New: [preamble] Skipped ranges vanish after reparse (#ifdef with #include)

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34971 Bug ID: 34971 Summary: [preamble] Skipped ranges vanish after reparse (#ifdef with #include) Product: clang Version: trunk Hardware: PC OS: Linux Statu

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34276] llvm-cov: region-coverage-lt ignores list of passed source files

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34276 Vedant Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3665 in oss-fuzz: llvm: Stack-overflow in clang::format::TokenAnnotator::annotate

2017-10-16 Thread monor… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Status: New Owner: CC: k...@google.com, masc...@google.com, jdevlieg...@apple.com, llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org, v...@apple.com Labels: ClusterFuzz Stability-Memory-AddressSanitizer Reproducible Engine-libfuzzer Proj-llvm Reported-2017-10-17 New issue 3665 by monor...@clusterfuzz-extern

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34275] llvm-cov: Passed list of source files ignored with "report"

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34275 Vedant Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33664] comments in assembly files confuse line numbers in debugging with lldb

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33664 Reid Kleckner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r...@google.com Status|NEW

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34950] clang reports incorrect line numbers for errors in assembly files

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34950 Reid Kleckner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34829] Merge r314890 r314891 into the 5.0 branch : [AVR] Fix displacement overflow for LDDW/STDW

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34829 Dylan McKay changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34492] [meta] 5.0.1 Release Blockers

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34492 Bug 34492 depends on bug 34829, which changed state. Bug 34829 Summary: Merge r314890 r314891 into the 5.0 branch : [AVR] Fix displacement overflow for LDDW/STDW https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34829 What|Removed

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34941] Infinite loop if function name equals intrinsic used in it

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34941 Eli Friedman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34910] debugging source and symbols are lost when linking

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34910 Andrew Kelley changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3627 in oss-fuzz: ASSERT: Res == 0

2017-10-16 Thread k… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Comment #8 on issue 3627 by k...@google.com: ASSERT: Res == 0 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3627#c8 We've raced :) Before r315933 this reproduced for me. Let OSS-Fuzz auto-close this bug. -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3627 in oss-fuzz: ASSERT: Res == 0

2017-10-16 Thread jus… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Comment #6 on issue 3627 by jus...@justinbogner.com: ASSERT: Res == 0 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3627#c6 Sorry, by empty I mean that there's no IR. That is: % opt -S -o - clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-5935702182199296.dms ; ModuleID = 'clusterfuzz-testcase-minimi

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3627 in oss-fuzz: ASSERT: Res == 0

2017-10-16 Thread k… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Comment #7 on issue 3627 by k...@google.com: ASSERT: Res == 0 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3627#c7 I've fixed the fuzz target in r315933. -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at:

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3660 in oss-fuzz: llvm/llvm-isel-fuzzer--aarch64-gisel: ASSERT: isReg() && "This is not a register operand!"

2017-10-16 Thread k… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Comment #4 on issue 3660 by k...@google.com: llvm/llvm-isel-fuzzer--aarch64-gisel: ASSERT: isReg() && "This is not a register operand!" https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3660#c4 If so, oss-fuzz should be able to confirm it within ~24 hours -- You received this message b

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3660 in oss-fuzz: llvm/llvm-isel-fuzzer--aarch64-gisel: ASSERT: isReg() && "This is not a register operand!"

2017-10-16 Thread jus… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Comment #3 on issue 3660 by jus...@justinbogner.com: llvm/llvm-isel-fuzzer--aarch64-gisel: ASSERT: isReg() && "This is not a register operand!" https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3660#c3 I believe that dsanders fixed this in r315890. -- You received this message because:

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3660 in oss-fuzz: llvm/llvm-isel-fuzzer--aarch64-gisel: ASSERT: isReg() && "This is not a register operand!"

2017-10-16 Thread jus… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Comment #2 on issue 3660 by jus...@justinbogner.com: llvm/llvm-isel-fuzzer--aarch64-gisel: ASSERT: isReg() && "This is not a register operand!" https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3660#c2 Reproducer in IR: source_filename = "M" define void @f() { BB: %A = alloca float

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3627 in oss-fuzz: ASSERT: Res == 0

2017-10-16 Thread k… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Comment #5 on issue 3627 by k...@google.com: ASSERT: Res == 0 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3627#c5 And the assertion is in libFuzzer that indicates that the fuzz target did not return 0 -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issu

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3629 in oss-fuzz: ASSERT: Offset <= INT_MAX && "Offset too big to fit in int."

2017-10-16 Thread jus… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Comment #2 on issue 3629 by jus...@justinbogner.com: ASSERT: Offset <= INT_MAX && "Offset too big to fit in int." https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3629#c2 Reproducer in IR: source_filename = "M" define void @f() { BB: %A11 = alloca i16 %A7 = alloca i1, i32 -1 %L4

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3628 in oss-fuzz: llvm: Abrt in handleLLVMFatalError

2017-10-16 Thread jus… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Comment #2 on issue 3628 by jus...@justinbogner.com: llvm: Abrt in handleLLVMFatalError https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3628#c2 Looks like selection is failing to set a register class: LLVM ERROR: VReg has no regclass after selection (in function: f) Converting the b

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3627 in oss-fuzz: ASSERT: Res == 0

2017-10-16 Thread k… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Updates: Cc: jus...@justinbogner.com Comment #4 on issue 3627 by k...@google.com: ASSERT: Res == 0 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3627#c4 The reproducer testcase is empty Hmm. 12 bytes for me ls -l ~/Downloads/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-5935702182199296 -rw

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3627 in oss-fuzz: ASSERT: Res == 0

2017-10-16 Thread jus… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Comment #3 on issue 3627 by jus...@justinbogner.com: ASSERT: Res == 0 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3627#c3 The reproducer testcase is empty, so I think this is a crash in the mutator, rather than a bug found by fuzzing. -- You received this message because: 1. You

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34969] New: apt.llvm.org does not have packages for libc++/libc++abi/libunwind

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34969 Bug ID: 34969 Summary: apt.llvm.org does not have packages for libc++/libc++abi/libunwind Product: Packaging Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3661 in oss-fuzz: llvm/clang-proto-fuzzer: Null-dereference READ in llvm::SCEV::getType

2017-10-16 Thread k… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Comment #3 on issue 3661 by k...@google.com: llvm/clang-proto-fuzzer: Null-dereference READ in llvm::SCEV::getType https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3661#c3 Filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34968 -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34968] New: null deref in llvm::ScalarEvolution::getMulExpr

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34968 Bug ID: 34968 Summary: null deref in llvm::ScalarEvolution::getMulExpr Product: new-bugs Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhan

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34967] New: Code generation fails with AESIMC intrinsic

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34967 Bug ID: 34967 Summary: Code generation fails with AESIMC intrinsic Product: clang Version: 5.0 Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement P

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34966] New: Missing static function with thinlto on AArch64 when an extern function with same name exists.

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34966 Bug ID: 34966 Summary: Missing static function with thinlto on AArch64 when an extern function with same name exists. Product: tools Version: trunk Hardware: PC OS

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3661 in oss-fuzz: llvm/clang-proto-fuzzer: Null-dereference READ in llvm::SCEV::getType

2017-10-16 Thread k… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Comment #2 on issue 3661 by k...@google.com: llvm/clang-proto-fuzzer: Null-dereference READ in llvm::SCEV::getType https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3661#c2 C++ reproducer: void foo(int *a) { while (1) { a[60] = ((1 + a[60]) + a[0]); while ((a[60] + a[0])) {

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3662 in oss-fuzz: llvm/clang-fuzzer: Stack-overflow in clang::StmtVisitorBase::Visit

2017-10-16 Thread monor… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Status: New Owner: CC: k...@google.com, masc...@google.com, jdevlieg...@apple.com, llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org, v...@apple.com Labels: ClusterFuzz Stability-Memory-AddressSanitizer Reproducible Engine-libfuzzer Proj-llvm Reported-2017-10-16 New issue 3662 by monor...@clusterfuzz-extern

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34965] New: After r311849 Loop Vectorizer crashes with "The instruction should be scalarized"

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34965 Bug ID: 34965 Summary: After r311849 Loop Vectorizer crashes with "The instruction should be scalarized" Product: libraries Version: trunk Hardware: PC OS: All

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3661 in oss-fuzz: llvm/clang-proto-fuzzer: Null-dereference READ in llvm::SCEV::getType

2017-10-16 Thread monor… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Status: New Owner: CC: k...@google.com, masc...@google.com, jdevlieg...@apple.com, llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org, v...@apple.com Labels: ClusterFuzz Stability-Memory-AddressSanitizer Reproducible Engine-libfuzzer Proj-llvm Reported-2017-10-16 New issue 3661 by monor...@clusterfuzz-extern

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34345] MemorySSA crashes when using ADCE preserved dominators. Assertion `dominates(MP, U) && "Memory PHI does not dominate it's uses"' failed.

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34345 Jakub Kuderski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34964] New: LLVM repo signature is probably broken

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34964 Bug ID: 34964 Summary: LLVM repo signature is probably broken Product: Packaging Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: release blocke

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34963] New: llvm-cov: Wrong coverage with macro inside of switch body

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34963 Bug ID: 34963 Summary: llvm-cov: Wrong coverage with macro inside of switch body Product: new-bugs Version: trunk Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34962] New: llvm-cov: Wrong coverage with macro use in if/else

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34962 Bug ID: 34962 Summary: llvm-cov: Wrong coverage with macro use in if/else Product: new-bugs Version: trunk Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhanceme

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3660 in oss-fuzz: llvm/llvm-isel-fuzzer--aarch64-gisel: ASSERT: isReg() && "This is not a register operand!"

2017-10-16 Thread monor… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Status: New Owner: CC: k...@google.com, masc...@google.com, jdevlieg...@apple.com, llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org, v...@apple.com Labels: ClusterFuzz Stability-Memory-AddressSanitizer Reproducible Engine-libfuzzer Proj-llvm Reported-2017-10-16 New issue 3660 by monor...@clusterfuzz-extern

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3659 in oss-fuzz: llvm/clang-fuzzer: ASSERT: BitWidth && "bitwidth too small"

2017-10-16 Thread monor… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Status: New Owner: CC: k...@google.com, masc...@google.com, jdevlieg...@apple.com, llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org, v...@apple.com Labels: ClusterFuzz Stability-Memory-AddressSanitizer Reproducible Engine-libfuzzer Proj-llvm Reported-2017-10-16 New issue 3659 by monor...@clusterfuzz-extern

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3656 in oss-fuzz: llvm: Stack-overflow in clang::format::UnwrappedLineParser::parseBlock

2017-10-16 Thread monor… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Status: New Owner: CC: k...@google.com, masc...@google.com, jdevlieg...@apple.com, llvm-b...@lists.llvm.org, v...@apple.com Labels: ClusterFuzz Stability-Memory-AddressSanitizer Reproducible Engine-libfuzzer Proj-llvm Reported-2017-10-16 New issue 3656 by monor...@clusterfuzz-extern

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3650 in oss-fuzz: llvm: Stack-overflow in clang::StmtVisitorBase::Visit

2017-10-16 Thread monor… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Updates: Labels: ClusterFuzz-Verified Status: Verified Comment #3 on issue 3650 by monor...@clusterfuzz-external.iam.gserviceaccount.com: llvm: Stack-overflow in clang::StmtVisitorBasebool>::Visit https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3650#c3 ClusterFuzz test

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3260 in oss-fuzz: llvm: ASSERT: (OtherT->isIntegerType() && ConstantT->isIntegerType()) && "comparison with non-

2017-10-16 Thread monor… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Updates: Labels: ClusterFuzz-Verified Status: Verified Comment #6 on issue 3260 by monor...@clusterfuzz-external.iam.gserviceaccount.com: llvm: ASSERT: (OtherT->isIntegerType() && ConstantT->isIntegerType()) && "comparison with non- https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issu

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34960] New: Segfault on parsing managed C++: Crash in clang::Decl::setInvalidDecl(bool) () from libclangAST.so

2017-10-16 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34960 Bug ID: 34960 Summary: Segfault on parsing managed C++: Crash in clang::Decl::setInvalidDecl(bool) () from libclangAST.so Product: clang Version: 5.0 Hardware:

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3650 in oss-fuzz: llvm: Stack-overflow in clang::StmtVisitorBase::Visit

2017-10-16 Thread monor… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Comment #2 on issue 3650 by monor...@clusterfuzz-external.iam.gserviceaccount.com: llvm: Stack-overflow in clang::StmtVisitorBasebool>::Visit https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3650#c2 ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 201710150453:201710160455. De

[llvm-bugs] Issue 3260 in oss-fuzz: llvm: ASSERT: (OtherT->isIntegerType() && ConstantT->isIntegerType()) && "comparison with non-

2017-10-16 Thread monor… via monorail via llvm-bugs
Comment #5 on issue 3260 by monor...@clusterfuzz-external.iam.gserviceaccount.com: llvm: ASSERT: (OtherT->isIntegerType() && ConstantT->isIntegerType()) && "comparison with non- https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3260#c5 ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in r