Author: djg
Date: Tue Aug 28 15:32:58 2007
New Revision: 41556
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=41556&view=rev
Log:
Add an option, -view-sunit-dags, for viewing the actual SUnit DAGs used by
scheduling.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/include/llvm/CodeGen/ScheduleDAG.h
llvm/trunk/lib/Cod
Author: cfr
Date: Tue Aug 28 13:59:02 2007
New Revision: 41553
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=41553&view=rev
Log:
Update win32 VStudio project files to keep pace with recently added and deleted
files
Modified:
llvm/trunk/win32/Support/Support.vcproj
llvm/trunk/win32/Transfo
Hi Evan, thanks for your comments.
> >> 3. In X86TargetLowering::LowerTRAMPOLINE():
> >> +case CallingConv::X86_StdCall: {
> >> + Move = 0xb9; // Pass chain in ECX
> >>
> >> I assume this is the ModR/M byte?
> >
> > Well, it's MOV32ri.
>
> Then it should be 0xb8?
It already had ECX or'd
Author: baldrick
Date: Tue Aug 28 11:11:02 2007
New Revision: 41539
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=41539&view=rev
Log:
Forward port of r40542.
Restore llvm version info.
Modified:
llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/gcc/Makefile.in
Modified: llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/gcc/Makefile.in
URL:
http://llvm.
Author: asl
Date: Tue Aug 28 10:57:24 2007
New Revision: 41538
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=41538&view=rev
Log:
Fix handling of cw-style asm blocks.
Modified:
llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/gcc/c-parser.c
llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c
Modified: llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/gcc/c-parser.c
>> According to table 3.1 of http://www.x86-64.org/documentation/abi.pdf,
>> the i64 and f64 types should have 8 byte alignment.
>>
>> The attached patch changes this for targets that are not darwin.
>
> Dan, Evan, is this ok? Evan, doesn't darwin follow the same ABI on
> x86-64?
It looks good
Author: asl
Date: Tue Aug 28 07:24:17 2007
New Revision: 41537
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=41537&view=rev
Log:
Unbreak mingw32 build from merge bugs.
Modified:
llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/gcc/config/i386/cygming.h
llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/gcc/config/i386/t-cygming
llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk
> I'm not aware of any cases where memmove vs. memcpy matters before
> codegen currently. If it were done at the LLVM IR level, would it be
> too trivial to be in a pass by itself, or would you want to add it,
> along with an addRequired, to some existing pass?
Doing it at the LLVM IL would also b
Author: evancheng
Date: Tue Aug 28 03:28:51 2007
New Revision: 41536
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=41536&view=rev
Log:
Recover most of the compile time regression due to recent live interval changes.
1. Eliminate the costly live interval "swapping".
2. Change ValueNumberInfo contain
