On 9/11/07, Chris Lattner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 11, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>
> > On 9/11/07, Anton Korobeynikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Bill,
> >>
> >>> The personality function on Darwin needs a global stub. We then
> >>> refer to
> >>> that global stub ins
On Sep 11, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> On 9/11/07, Anton Korobeynikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Bill,
>>
>>> The personality function on Darwin needs a global stub. We then
>>> refer to
>>> that global stub instead of doing the ".set" thingy we were doing
>>> before.
>> This
On 9/11/07, Anton Korobeynikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill,
>
> > The personality function on Darwin needs a global stub. We then refer to
> > that global stub instead of doing the ".set" thingy we were doing before.
> This breaks linux. The problem is indirect encoding of personality
> symbo
On 9/11/07, Anton Korobeynikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill,
>
> > The personality function on Darwin needs a global stub. We then refer to
> > that global stub instead of doing the ".set" thingy we were doing before.
> This breaks linux. The problem is indirect encoding of personality
> symbo
Bill,
> The personality function on Darwin needs a global stub. We then refer to
> that global stub instead of doing the ".set" thingy we were doing before.
This breaks linux. The problem is indirect encoding of personality
symbol. It shouldn't be so for linux. It seems we need another knob for
it