Hello, Evan
> Problem 1:
> (gdb) b main
> Line number not known for symbol "main"
> Explicitly setting a breakpoint on line 10 works.
That's strange. This definitely works for me. Could you please send me
the .bc and native gcc output with extra -dA option?
> Problem 2:
> In function f().
> (gdb)
Hello, Evan
> Problem 1:
> (gdb) b main
> Line number not known for symbol "main"
> Explicitly setting a breakpoint on line 10 works.
That's strange. This definitely works for me. Could you please send me
the .bc and native gcc output with extra -dA option?
> Problem 2:
> In function f().
> (gdb)
Hi Anton,
Here is a silly test case:
#include
struct ss {
int x;
int y;
};
void f(int a, struct ss b) {
=>printf("%d %d\n", a, b.x);
}
int main() {
struct ss S = {1, 2};
f(0, S);
return 0;
}
Problem 1:
(gdb) b main
Line number not known for symbol "main"
Explicitly setting a brea
Evan,
> This allows gdb to examine local scalar variables, but not aggregate
> ones. There are also issues with parameters, even scalar ones.
Ok. Any other testcases? Owen, ready for another session? :)
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov.
Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Peters
On Jan 24, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Owen Anderson wrote:
> Evan, Chris,
> I've confirmed that basic testcases appear to be working with this
> change.
Awesome, thanks Anton and Owen!
-Chris
___
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists
This allows gdb to examine local scalar variables, but not aggregate
ones. There are also issues with parameters, even scalar ones.
Evan
On Jan 24, 2008, at 5:17 PM, Evan Cheng wrote:
> Woot. Thx a bunch. I'll look at more complicated cases.
>
> Evan
>
> On Jan 24, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Owen Ander
On Jan 24, 2008, at 5:17 PM, Evan Cheng wrote:
> Woot. Thx a bunch. I'll look at more complicated cases.
>
> Evan
My bad. Thanks Anton and sorry everybody.
> On Jan 24, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Owen Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Evan, Chris,
>>
>> I've confirmed that basic testcases appear
Woot. Thx a bunch. I'll look at more complicated cases.
Evan
On Jan 24, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Owen Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Evan, Chris,
>
> I've confirmed that basic testcases appear to be working with this
> change.
>
> --Owen
>
> On Jan 24, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Anton Korobeynikov wrot
Evan, Chris,
I've confirmed that basic testcases appear to be working with this
change.
--Owen
On Jan 24, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
Author: asl
Date: Thu Jan 24 18:34:13 2008
New Revision: 46337
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=46337&view=rev
Log:
Provide cor
Author: asl
Date: Thu Jan 24 18:34:13 2008
New Revision: 46337
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=46337&view=rev
Log:
Provide correct DWARF register numbering for debug information emission on
x86-32/Darwin.
This should fix bunch of issues.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86Re
10 matches
Mail list logo
