Re: [llvm-commits] llvm-gcc4: use langhooks rather than front-end calls in i386.c

2007-01-23 Thread Jim Laskey
The server has been been failing quite a bit over the last month and the cron rsync of the mirror is one of the last things that gets restored after bring up. The good news is that the server was replaced on the weekend. Cheers, -- Jim On 23-Jan-07, at 03:40 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: O

Re: [llvm-commits] llvm-gcc4: use langhooks rather than front-end calls in i386.c

2007-01-22 Thread Devang Patel
On Jan 20, 2007, at 6:43 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Devang, thanks for reviewing these patches. > >> Applied, after adding "APPLE LOCAL llvm" markers. > > This hasn't turned up in the llvm-gcc4 svn repository > yet. Did you apply it there or to some other tree? > (I'm waiting for it to turn up

Re: [llvm-commits] llvm-gcc4: use langhooks rather than front-end calls in i386.c

2007-01-18 Thread Devang Patel
On Jan 17, 2007, at 12:55 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > The section of code marked "APPLE LOCAL CW asm blocks" contains calls > to routines that only exist in the C-like front-ends (C, C++, ObjC). > Some of them are equivalent to langhook calls - so use langhooks for > those. This reduces the number

[llvm-commits] llvm-gcc4: use langhooks rather than front-end calls in i386.c

2007-01-17 Thread Duncan Sands
The section of code marked "APPLE LOCAL CW asm blocks" contains calls to routines that only exist in the C-like front-ends (C, C++, ObjC). Some of them are equivalent to langhook calls - so use langhooks for those. This reduces the number of stubs needed to get non C-like languages compiling. Ind