Hello,
During my testing I come upon an interesting thing.
What is the purpose of setting a new EffectView model (in constructor
below), after this new effect control view is already created?
Shouldn`t this be vice-versa? Can anyone comment on this?
EffectView::EffectView( Effect * _model, QWi
Hi, just lets move this below better subject :)
-Mike
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Mike Choi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just submitted a new patch, which should bring following fixes or
> improvements for LMMS VSTi and effect integration:
>
>- Added support for VST parameters control fo
On 01/14/2013 02:51 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> as you all know, we want to change at least the program logo in the
> future. There were various proposals in the past which I'd like to
> summarize. The three logos attached were the most complete drafts I
> found in my inbox. If I forgot somebody's
Okay, here are the four I've done so far. I've been speeding up as I learn,
but it's still a bit slow going. I would like feedback on if this is
acceptable before I invest the remaining to to do all of them.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:11 PM, John Serafino wrote:
> I forgot to use the "Reply all"
Please make it possible to vote without having facebook too, like on the
forums for example.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Chrissy McManus <
chrissy.m...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > as you all know, we want to change at least the program logo in the
> > future. There were vari
I LOVE the second one 3rd image. it's way more professional than the actual
one. the others relay so much on the name that it's not so good if the name
changes.
Amazing! :D
2013/1/14 David Gerard
> On 14 January 2013 19:51, Tobias Doerffel
> wrote:
>
> > as you all know, we want to change at l
I forgot to use the "Reply all" feature and sent a few messages only to
Toby. Here is what was said:
Johnny: Maybe I can do this. Should they still be green, and should they
still be italic are the main questions.
Toby: No, should be plain not not too plain. I'd like something e.g. based on
the no
>
> Hi,
>
> as you all know, we want to change at least the program logo in the
> future. There were various proposals in the past which I'd like to
> summarize. The three logos attached were the most complete drafts I
> found in my inbox. If I forgot somebody's proposal please reply and
> atta
On 14 January 2013 19:51, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> as you all know, we want to change at least the program logo in the
> future. There were various proposals in the past which I'd like to
> summarize. The three logos attached were the most complete drafts I
> found in my inbox. If I forgot somebo
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Tobias Doerffel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as you all know, we want to change at least the program logo in the
> future. There were various proposals in the past which I'd like to
> summarize. The three logos attached were the most complete drafts I
> found in my inbox. If I
Hi,
2012/12/28 Raindrops From Sky :
> Yes, that was supposed to be "clef", but it became "cleft" by mistake; may
> be due to swype auto-correction in my smartphone.
> Your first symbol is correct.
You're right, we need to do something about this. My suggestion is to
renew all the note icons (note
11 matches
Mail list logo
