Re: [LMMS-devel] umcaruje suggests: Top songs Compilation [unfa copies from Forum]

Already know how to raise the funds, but my question is How much in terms of funds plus what incentives and prizes can we give to those who donate? On Sunday 12 January 2014 01:14:14 Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > I wanted to share this one as it might be a good idea to make regular > LMMS-promoting (and

Re: [LMMS-devel] Feature: Piano Roll Key Press

On 11 January 2014 15:30, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > forwarded the issue to toby for him to take a look at. I've edited the issue a little bit to include the complete row highlight when playing the keys in piano roll. -- Gurjot Singh Blog: http://bhattigurjot.wordpress.com

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

On 12 January 2014 12:43, Johannes Lorenz wrote: >> i want to propose a little modified idea of collaborative work. >> >> that's something i was discussing on reverbnation >> for me that was a kind of game, so each partner could add some >> instrument, merge it in one track and push it forward for

Re: [LMMS-devel] Mailing List vs Forum

On 12 January 2014 12:23, Johannes Lorenz wrote: > One more important problem of a mailing list: > > * If you have 20 new mails in a thread, you have to click 20 times. Of > course, there might be websites that mirror multiple posts, like in a forum, > but then, this does not make it better than

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

> Why not instead two plugins: send plugin and return plugin. That way you > can send anything anywhere... > > Also, they should have the option to send to / return from external > sources/sinks via Jack. That alone would make LMMS 200% more powerful... Sounds extremely powerful to me to have a s

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

> i want to propose a little modified idea of collaborative work. > > that's something i was discussing on reverbnation > for me that was a kind of game, so each partner could add some > instrument, merge it in one track and push it forward for someone else. One one hand, I really like this idea

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

I think source code publishing is not necessary. But it should have no (not linux native) VSTs. Why? 1. It is Linux MMS, Linux = Not dll/exe files. 2. If you just use VSTs, then you could use FL studio aswell. Show us that you can do it with Linux aswell. ---

Re: [LMMS-devel] Mailing List vs Forum

There is something and its called nabble. People can post to the mailing list from the nabble site and vice versa. On Sunday 12 January 2014 07:53:14 Johannes Lorenz wrote: > One more important problem of a mailing list: > > * If you have 20 new mails in a thread, you have to click 20 times. Of

Re: [LMMS-devel] Mailing List vs Forum

One more important problem of a mailing list: * If you have 20 new mails in a thread, you have to click 20 times. Of course, there might be websites that mirror multiple posts, like in a forum, but then, this does not make it better than a forum imo.

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

On 12 January 2014 01:53, Uroš Maravić wrote: > > Let's do a "Top LMMS Songs Compilation". By making a group on SoundCloud, > users can post their best songs, and the top 15 songs (chosen by selected > judges) will be released as an album on Bandcamp. The price? “Pay what you > want”. All of the p

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wake LMMS up!

as one of the rebranding maybe Linux Micro Music Suite for linux this can be Libre but i don't like that should be more like Live, but it is overused already, maybe L'ectro just ... you know. On 09.01.2014 16:41, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > Thank you, Emilio! > > The misleading name issue you mentione

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

On 01/12/2014 01:16 AM, John Serafino wrote: > That's a good point. A lot of pro level LMMS artists (flatteringly > including myself) use other software in combination with LMMS. Many of > my tracks use Audacity for vocal insertion and Ardour2 for mastering. > I think it should require primarily LM

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

i want to propose a little modified idea of collaborative work. that's something i was discussing on reverbnation for me that was a kind of game, so each partner could add some instrument, merge it in one track and push it forward for someone else. and well this is a FOSS-like thing, when someon

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

On 01/12/2014 12:44 AM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > > I've been thinking of a way to make route everything everywhere. We'd > need a special plugin that is a mixer send. You'd select what channel > to send the signal to and what amount, and more importantly you could > put several sends in one stack. Fo

[LMMS-devel] umcaruje suggests: Top songs Compilation [unfa copies from Forum]

I wanted to share this one as it might be a good idea to make regular LMMS-promoting (and possibly funding) campaigns using Community input. - unfa Now read the original post ( the address is: https://sourceforge.net/apps/phpbb/lmms/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1119 ) LMMS Top songs Compilation

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

That's a good point. A lot of pro level LMMS artists (flatteringly including myself) use other software in combination with LMMS. Many of my tracks use Audacity for vocal insertion and Ardour2 for mastering. I think it should require primarily LMMS, but allow open-source post production. On Sat,

Re: [LMMS-devel] Advertising LMMS: press releases?

I think we should wait untill we have more to show, but a short note on the WebPage would be good. Maybe a little update every now and then. I think we need people to form a *press *team. They'd have to collect news about the project, prepare press updates, maintain a list of sites to inform and k

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

I've been thinking of a way to make route everything everywhere. We'd need a special plugin that is a mixer send. You'd select what channel to send the signal to and what amount, and more importantly you could put several sends in one stack. For example one send for a channel where reverb is added

Re: [LMMS-devel] Mailing List vs Forum

I agree. Starting anew is temptating, but fixing the old seems to be a reasonable and more optimized action to take. On 10 Jan 2014 18:53, "Vesa" wrote: > If we want an LMMS forum, I don't think it should be a new one. I think > the existing SF forum should be migrated to a new place. The SF foru

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

for me it's just a case of used soft, because if i had to write it only with lmms or just produce few sounds but then go to logic,cub,able - it's kinda ... unfair maybe. so for me the contest is in using open source software only and to prove it, well sending a project would be enough. but if th

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

If we are compiling ways to make money for the devs, I have a few suggestions But they require the new logo (does anyone else remember that discussion?) T-Shirts Tea Mugs Stickers etc... Set up a secure store on that fast UK server, setup LMMS paypal and also include a 'Donate' button. The

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

I'll be happy to contribute, but unless we're scoping enough money to pay developer wages, I don't really see how raising money would help LMMS. I think the project needs more developers who have more time to spend on the project. The new revival seems to be looking to help with this though, so tha

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

The songs will be sent to a SoundCloud group, there will be no need for sending LMMS projects. I must say that I am really glad that you will contribute, Lazerblade. :) - Best regards Uroš -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LMMS-Top-son

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

A lot of my tracks use a ton of VSTs, and LMMS is not good about sharing projects with VSTs in them. Also, some of my best tracks' project files were lost to a hard drive crash. And who am I? I am LazerBlade, so my tracks would be an excellent addition to this project. Here are a few of my best: h

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

On 01/11/2014 10:30 PM, oeai wrote: > do they have to post source code as well? > (" > ")<-- penguin > I think it should be up to the artist. -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why Mo

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

do they have to post source code as well? (" > ")<-- penguin On 12.01.2014 00:23, Uroš Maravić wrote: > Hello everyone, > There has been a lot of talk about how the development of LMMS should be > faster. I have figured out a way for all users, including those who don't > really know programmi

[LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

Hello everyone, There has been a lot of talk about how the development of LMMS should be faster. I have figured out a way for all users, including those who don't really know programming to a far extent to help with the process of development. Let's do a "Top LMMS Songs Compilation". By making a

Re: [LMMS-devel] Advertising LMMS: press releases?

On 01/11/2014 06:19 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > I think its a bit early. I think once we have an RC we lots of new features I > think we can then start doing so > No, yeah I meant when we're close to a release, or even when the release is out. No point doing it now, people will lose interest w

Re: [LMMS-devel] Mailing List vs Forum

We will never come to a concensus. Everyone will have their own preference on what to use. At this point I think we should keep using the SF forums and mailing lists. Ultimately toby makes the final decision. On Saturday 11 January 2014 17:45:52 Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > Rob, to me your message r

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI graphical rehaul project

I like the look of it too... could you make it look more like brushed metal, though... the texture of it seems more like marble. That is my only critique, but it does indeed look very nice. On 01/11/2014 07:08 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > I like that grey silver look. Would be nice to have th

Re: [LMMS-devel] Advertising LMMS: press releases?

I think we could still market it now as well saying a new release is in the works get people interested and curious On Saturday 11 January 2014 10:51:14 Israel wrote: > A bit early, yes. I think it should also get out into the non-free > world, too. > It would be nice to have an article in a mus

Re: [LMMS-devel] Advertising LMMS: press releases?

A bit early, yes. I think it should also get out into the non-free world, too. It would be nice to have an article in a music production oriented site. And have it promoted in more areas than just FLOSS sites, though I think those are very important. On 01/11/2014 10:19 AM, Jonathan Aquilina

Re: [LMMS-devel] Mailing List vs Forum

Rob, to me your message really ends this discussion. I've also noticed that I'm taking part in the discussions here using a mobile mail client half the time, reading and writing many messages offline. This wouldn't wo > > On 01/10/2014 09:02 AM, Johannes Lorenz wrote: > > Pro (Forum): > > * Subfor

Re: [LMMS-devel] Advertising LMMS: press releases?

I think its a bit early. I think once we have an RC we lots of new features I think we can then start doing so On Saturday 11 January 2014 18:09:42 Vesa wrote: > I was thinking, perhaps we could write up some kind of press releases > about new LMMS releases, drumming up hype on new features and s

[LMMS-devel] Advertising LMMS: press releases?

I was thinking, perhaps we could write up some kind of press releases about new LMMS releases, drumming up hype on new features and such, and offering these to sites that are geared towards reporting on open source software, like Phoronix or LAS. I think this could be a good way to make LMMS better

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI graphical rehaul project

I like that grey silver look. Would be nice to have that as default for the entire UI. On Saturday 11 January 2014 14:58:01 Vesa wrote: > To kick off this UI graphics rehaul project, here's the SF2 plugin > artwork upgrade I've been working on. > > It turned out to be too much of a pain to just

Re: [LMMS-devel] Calling next release revolution

Toby and Paul are still involved, but im kinda helping them out moving the project forward. There are a few things I am waiting on hearing back from toby about such as the issue tracker on git hub not being veyr user friendly when it comes to patch submissions. I have another solution that I am wil

Re: [LMMS-devel] Feature: Piano Roll Key Press

forwarded the issue to toby for him to take a look at. On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Gurjot Singh wrote: > On 11 January 2014 15:21, Jonathan Aquilina > wrote: > > If I am not mistaken TOBY please confirm but i think you have to be > added to > > the project Gurjot Also what is the name of

Re: [LMMS-devel] Feature: Piano Roll Key Press

On 11 January 2014 15:21, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > If I am not mistaken TOBY please confirm but i think you have to be added to > the project Gurjot Also what is the name of the issue. Okay. The issue is "Piano Roll Key Press". -- Gurjot Singh Blog: http://bhattigurjot.wordpress.com ---

Re: [LMMS-devel] Feature: Piano Roll Key Press

If I am not mistaken TOBY please confirm but i think you have to be added to the project Gurjot Also what is the name of the issue. On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Gurjot Singh wrote: > On 11 January 2014 14:05, Gurjot Singh wrote: > >> You should create a new issue for this on the github page

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

On 01/11/2014 11:02 AM, Johannes Lorenz wrote: > >> Actually, LMMS supports either 1 in, 1 out, or 2 in, 2 out. Also, >> plugins with 1-in-1-out are "doubled" so that an instance of the effect >> will be loaded for both stereo channels. You can see this in that if you >> add a mono effect, there wi

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

> Actually, LMMS supports either 1 in, 1 out, or 2 in, 2 out. Also, > plugins with 1-in-1-out are "doubled" so that an instance of the effect > will be loaded for both stereo channels. You can see this in that if you > add a mono effect, there will be separate controls for both channels, > while

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

On 01/11/2014 10:33 AM, Johannes Lorenz wrote: > Hi, > > I always wanted to use a vocoder in LMMS, but it is impossible, because the > LADSPA vocoder has 2 input and one output stereo channel(s). However, LMMS > only supports 1 in, 1 out. I wonder why, probably because the other thing is > just

Re: [LMMS-devel] Feature: Piano Roll Key Press

On 11 January 2014 14:05, Gurjot Singh wrote: >> You should create a new issue for this on the github page. > > Ok, I'll create one. Done! It is saying that "No one is assigned". @GitHub Admins, kindly assign this issue to me so that others should be made aware. -- Gurjot Singh Blog: http://bh

Re: [LMMS-devel] Feature: Piano Roll Key Press

On 11 January 2014 12:55, Vesa wrote: > You should create a new issue for this on the github page. Ok, I'll create one. > The images > for pressed-down piano roll keys are there, they're included with the > default theme, but the changing of the images hasn't been implemented. > I'd start by loo

[LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

Hi, I always wanted to use a vocoder in LMMS, but it is impossible, because the LADSPA vocoder has 2 input and one output stereo channel(s). However, LMMS only supports 1 in, 1 out. I wonder why, probably because the other thing is just a bit more complicated to GUI-code. Here are my plans to