[LMMS-devel] FX-Mixer active FX-channel visible

In my opinion now active FX channel looks not enough, and have to peer. I think it is necessary to make more visible, for example as an active bank channel group (which A, B, C, D) -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Ent

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

On 01/13/2014 05:56 AM, Harry van Haaren wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Gurjot Singh > wrote: > > Just to double check, so external VSTs are not allowed right? > > > If these songs are going to be distributed along with LMMS, then using > VSTs should n

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

On 01/13/2014 05:53 AM, Gurjot Singh wrote: > On 13 January 2014 03:19, Uroš Maravić wrote: >> The competition is open! Submit your songs at >> https://soundcloud.com/groups/lmms-top-songs-compilation The deadline is >> February 15th at 12 PM GMT. The rules are in the group description. >> If some

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

On 01/12/2014 11:49 PM, Uroš Maravić wrote: > The competition is open! Submit your songs at > https://soundcloud.com/groups/lmms-top-songs-compilation The deadline is > February 15th at 12 PM GMT. The rules are in the group description. > If something isn't clear to you about the competition, don't

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Gurjot Singh wrote: > Just to double check, so external VSTs are not allowed right? > If these songs are going to be distributed along with LMMS, then using VSTs should not be allowed: if the point of the contest is to show-off features perhaps it is possible. I'

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

On 13 January 2014 03:19, Uroš Maravić wrote: > The competition is open! Submit your songs at > https://soundcloud.com/groups/lmms-top-songs-compilation The deadline is > February 15th at 12 PM GMT. The rules are in the group description. > If something isn't clear to you about the competition, do

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

Is it possible to split the output and send it to more than one FX channel? I think that this is really all we need for now. With unlimited mixer channels there is no need to make every plugin a sub channel... simple is better and this way we can do submixes, FX sends and all crazy stuff with not m

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

The send+receive plugin pair in fact would be another form of routing, that can be acheived in a Reasonish way: using virtual in/out sockets and connector cables. I see a situation where every plugin in the stack is a bar with in socket(s) on the left side and out on the right. They'd by default au

Re: [LMMS-devel] Looking for a way to help LMMS development

2014/1/10 Vesa > 2) the CSS theming is (AFAICT) implemented with Qt's own CSS engine, > meaning it's less work for LMMS, no need to write a theming engine from > scratch > Yes, there's very good builtin CSS support in Qt and without it, it would be a lots of work to implement theming support on

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

The competition is open! Submit your songs at https://soundcloud.com/groups/lmms-top-songs-compilation The deadline is February 15th at 12 PM GMT. The rules are in the group description. If something isn't clear to you about the competition, don't hesitate to ask :) Happy LMMSing! - Best re

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

I don't really like the idea of trying to showcase a piece of software by forbidding usage of one of its most powerful features. I think the point should be to showcase LMMS's power, not to showcase esoteric skill on the part of the artists. On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Johannes Lorenz < joha

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

One more thing I'd suggest to add: Let's give the people a few weeks of time to make a song. This way, musicians can make new songs for the competition, or find out which o their old songs they'd like to use. I'd personally love to submit a track, but I'd write a completely new one. What do you

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wake LMMS up!

so this can be non -lmms abbr? LeMMingS is probably copyrighted LaMMerS - is something used as name and LeMusiqueMaeStro - le maestro de la musique Lammaestro - sounds better eLectroMusicMaSter -> etro || etrosound sorry it gets usually in reply not in lmms-list first, that's something i do

Re: [LMMS-devel] Ubuntu Packaging Question (about LMMS Source Code)

On 01/12/2014 11:23 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: Hi, simply use all files with "vst" (ignore case) inside: RemoteVstPlugin libvstbase.so libvsteffect.so RemoteVstPlugin.exe.so Also I just changed the installation folder for libraries on 64 bit platform: it's now

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wake LMMS up!

I logged in the #lmms channel on IRC and I'm telling the story to the guys over there, they had no idea of what was going on. Do you think someone can write a little article for posting on lmms communities? 2014/1/12 Tobiasz Karoń > I'd like to encourage thinking of non-descriptive names like

Re: [LMMS-devel] Fix import of 32-bit wav files

2014/1/10 Vesa > Ok... how exactly do I submit the patch there? Prefered way: fork repository, commit your patch in your repository and send a pull request. The patch itself looks good! :-) Toby -- CenturyLink Cloud: T

Re: [LMMS-devel] Again, mailing lists are forums

On 01/12/2014 09:38 AM, johanne...@mailueberfall.de wrote: > They are usable as very reduced forums, but they are not. Tons of > features are missing, like e.g. editing a forum (I guess). The inability to revise history is another point in favor of mailing lists, as far as I'm concerned. Eventual

Re: [LMMS-devel] Ubuntu Packaging Question (about LMMS Source Code)

Hi, simply use all files with "vst" (ignore case) inside: RemoteVstPlugin libvstbase.so libvsteffect.so RemoteVstPlugin.exe.so Also I just changed the installation folder for libraries on 64 bit platform: it's now /usr/lib just like on any other platform. Toby --

Re: [LMMS-devel] Mailing List vs Forum

On 01/12/2014 02:15 AM, Gurjot Singh wrote: >> * If you have 20 new mails in a thread, you have to click 20 times. > Actually no. I use gmail client for my mails. I've created a filter for > lmms-devel, ... Which brings me to another point in favor of mailing lists that I forgot to include in my

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

Hi, the FX sends allow to send the output of any FX channels to arbitrary other FX channels with individual wet ratios (including loop detection) - Andrew Kelley once really did a good job! I know that the current implementation is not stable yet, but that's what we should work on now! Regarding

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

2014/1/12 Vesa > On 01/12/2014 06:22 PM, Hannu Haahti wrote: > > Just a note about Bitrot: its build system might need some minor > > changes but still it should be possible to be included. > > > > Hijacker however is dependent on JACK and still quirky and perhaps a > > bit unstable, so it might

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

On 01/12/2014 06:22 PM, Hannu Haahti wrote: > Just a note about Bitrot: its build system might need some minor > changes but still it should be possible to be included. > > Hijacker however is dependent on JACK and still quirky and perhaps a > bit unstable, so it might not be useful to some users;

Re: [LMMS-devel] Mailing List vs Forum

I suggest some editing of the Community page on SF. I believe that some sections should be written differently, organized slightly differently, tell  people explicitly the things they need to know, do not assume that they know. Example: "Join SF today to enjoy the community forum, check out and up

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

Just a note about Bitrot: its build system might need some minor changes but still it should be possible to be included. Hijacker however is dependent on JACK and still quirky and perhaps a bit unstable, so it might not be useful to some users; especially those on Windows and those who don't use J

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wake LMMS up!

I'd like to encourage thinking of non-descriptive names like Ardour, Blender, Reason, Cubase... On 12 Jan 2014 06:37, "oeai" wrote: > as one of the rebranding maybe > Linux Micro Music Suite > for linux this can be Libre but i don't like that should be more like > Live, but it is overused alread

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

Any chance of including these (and the bitrot plugins) with LMMS by default? On 01/12/2014 01:55 PM, grejppi wrote: > diiz wrote >> Also, they should have the option to send to / return from external >> sources/sinks via Jack. That alone would make LMMS 200% more powerful... > I just wrote a LADSP

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI graphical rehaul project

On 01/12/2014 08:55 AM, Vesa wrote: On 01/12/2014 04:31 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: 2014/1/11 Israel mailto:israeld...@gmail.com>> I like the look of it too... could you make it look more like brushed metal, though... the texture of it seems more like marble. That is my only cri

Re: [LMMS-devel] Phabricator instead of issue tracker on github and forums

Hi Jonathan, thank you for proposals and offers! I fear that Phabricator just would add more redundancy. IMHO we should try to concentrate everything into/around Github, even though it might have some limitations compared to Phabricator. When using the concept of pull requests, we circumvent the p

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI graphical rehaul project

On 01/12/2014 04:31 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > 2014/1/11 Israel mailto:israeld...@gmail.com>> > > I like the look of it too... could you make it look more like brushed > metal, though... the texture of it seems more like marble. That is my > only critique, but it does indeed look ver

Re: [LMMS-devel] issue tracker

2014/1/10 Jonathan Aquilina > There is one issue with the issue tracker we cannot submit patches > directly. > I'd prefer using the new possibilities on Github (pull requests): - create own repository fork - make your changes - send a pull request to the LMMS repository That way we developers

Re: [LMMS-devel] Again, mailing lists are forums

No. They are usable as very reduced forums, but they are not. Tons of features are missing, like e.g. editing a forum (I guess). -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Ar

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI graphical rehaul project

2014/1/11 Israel > I like the look of it too... could you make it look more like brushed > metal, though... the texture of it seems more like marble. That is my > only critique, but it does indeed look very nice +1 Regarding theming: back in the days when we started LMMS SVG was not an option

Re: [LMMS-devel] Feature: Piano Roll Key Press

On 12 January 2014 19:53, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > You don't have to take care of key press events anymore at all - everything > is in place already. In paintEvent() you have to retrieve the Piano model > instance via > > pattern->instrumentTrack()->pianoModel() > > and retrieve the current key st

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

VST's is supported in Linux, so I don't see why .pat-files,.dll-files or .sf2 files wouldn't be allowed. Maybe we need a way to check if it really is LMMS, a picture or uploading .mmpz could be it. -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LMMS-T

Re: [LMMS-devel] Feature: Piano Roll Key Press

You don't have to take care of key press events anymore at all - everything is in place already. In paintEvent() you have to retrieve the Piano model instance via pattern->instrumentTrack()->pianoModel() and retrieve the current key states via a yet to be implemented public "isKeyPressed( int key

Re: [LMMS-devel] Advertising LMMS: press releases?

I fully agree. We should wait at least for a RC which (if we include and stabilize notable new features) will not be released before March. Toby -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More

Re: [LMMS-devel] Feature: Piano Roll Key Press

On 12 January 2014 19:41, Vesa wrote: > Hmm. How are keypresses implemented in the instrument window? The two functions are there it seems. 1.) keyPressEvent: This function recognises the keys pressed. 2.) mousePressEvent: This function includes the left click press to determine the key presses.

Re: [LMMS-devel] Feature: Piano Roll Key Press

Hi, the PianoView class operates on the Piano (model) class where it looks up the pressed keys. You can use the same model (retrieve it from the InstrumentTrack a specific pattern belongs to) for rendering the keys in the piano roll. HTH Toby -

Re: [LMMS-devel] Feature: Piano Roll Key Press

On 01/12/2014 03:38 PM, Gurjot Singh wrote: > On 11 January 2014 12:55, Vesa wrote: >> You should create a new issue for this on the github page. The images >> for pressed-down piano roll keys are there, they're included with the >> default theme, but the changing of the images hasn't been impleme

Re: [LMMS-devel] Mailing List vs Forum

Hi, I'm repeating my opinion from one or two years ago: I don't want to force somebody to use a specific platform system but personally I don't have the time to partipicate in a forum - I want all in my mail inbox (and delete unrelated items so that they will never appear again) and not having to

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

On 01/12/2014 01:55 PM, grejppi wrote: > diiz wrote >> Also, they should have the option to send to / return from external >> sources/sinks via Jack. That alone would make LMMS 200% more powerful... > I just wrote a LADSPA plugin that does this a couple of days ago. > https://github.com/grejppi/hij

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wake LMMS up!

Libre Music-Making Studio? Libre-Made Music Studio? Love My Music Studio / Software? Let's Make Musical Sounds? Martin :-) PS: Moving development to git was a great idea... On 12 January 2014 13:35, oeai wrote: > as one of the rebranding maybe > Linux Micro Music Suite > for linux this c

Re: [LMMS-devel] Feature: Piano Roll Key Press

On 11 January 2014 12:55, Vesa wrote: > You should create a new issue for this on the github page. The images > for pressed-down piano roll keys are there, they're included with the > default theme, but the changing of the images hasn't been implemented. > I'd start by looking at src/gui/piano_rol

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

diiz wrote > Also, they should have the option to send to / return from external > sources/sinks via Jack. That alone would make LMMS 200% more powerful... I just wrote a LADSPA plugin that does this a couple of days ago. https://github.com/grejppi/hijacker It has the side effect of including lat

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

I completely agree with diiz, there should be trust in artist that he wont "cheat". As for using other software and VST's, it will be allowed to use VST's, and the track should be created mostly in LMMS, but it is allowed to master/mix it in some other software (Audacity, Ardour...). - Best

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

On 01/12/2014 10:03 AM, Raine M. Ekman wrote: > There's the recently backported FX mixer send feature, what's that? I > tried it but can't add channels to the mixer, LMMS crashes. > > > > That's a different thing I think, I believe it's just a knob in the FX channel that adjusts the wet/dry leve

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

On 01/12/2014 09:11 AM, Johannes Lorenz wrote: > I think source code publishing is not necessary. But it should have no (not > linux native) VSTs. Another problem is, that LMMS still doesn't support Linux-native VST's or LV2's. Meaning, if VST's are disallowed, then there's no external instrumen

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

On 01/12/2014 09:14 AM, Johannes Lorenz wrote: >> Why not instead two plugins: send plugin and return plugin. That way you >> can send anything anywhere... >> >> Also, they should have the option to send to / return from external >> sources/sinks via Jack. That alone would make LMMS 200% more power

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Top songs Compilation

On 01/12/2014 09:11 AM, Johannes Lorenz wrote: > I think source code publishing is not necessary. But it should have no (not > linux native) VSTs. Why? > > 1. It is Linux MMS, Linux = Not dll/exe files. > 2. If you just use VSTs, then you could use FL studio aswell. Show us that > you can do it w

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

Quoting Vesa : > On 01/12/2014 12:44 AM, Tobiasz Karo? wrote: >> >> I've been thinking of a way to make route everything everywhere. We'd >> need a special plugin that is a mixer send. You'd select what channel >> to send the signal to and what amount, and more importantly you could >> put several