agreed. also increase the number of formats we support even the closed
stuff.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Vesa wrote:
> On 01/14/2014 03:54 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > I was told last i asked about this that there were very few available.
> >
>
> Maybe, but the few that exist are pret
On 01/14/2014 03:54 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> I was told last i asked about this that there were very few available.
>
Maybe, but the few that exist are pretty good quality, I'm told. There
aren't all that many LV2 instruments either...
What we really need is the Linux equivalent of SynthEd
I was told last i asked about this that there were very few available.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Vesa wrote:
> On 01/14/2014 03:45 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > What would it take to make native linux equivalent to vst's that would
> > really set LMMS apart from the competition
> >
>
On 01/14/2014 03:45 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> What would it take to make native linux equivalent to vst's that would
> really set LMMS apart from the competition
>
>
> --
These do exist, they're called LinuxVST's, and they're supported by
almost every Linux DAW... except by the one with "Linu
I think this is something we should really work on implementing. As it
woudl set us up as unique. and we can then on linux itself drop the need
for win and vst's
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:49 AM, John Serafino wrote:
> LV2 is basically this, and I think the master unstable branch of LMMS had
> s
LV2 is basically this, and I think the master unstable branch of LMMS had
some primitive LV2 support. Of course, it's possible to host LV2's in a
separate Linux application and MIDI-route between LMMS and the LV2 host.
I've done this, but I've never used it in a track.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 7:4
What would it take to make native linux equivalent to vst's that would
really set LMMS apart from the competition
--
Jonathan Aquilina
--
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Busines
> The rules are in the group description.
> If something isn't clear to you about the competition, don't hesitate to ask.
There is one question I have. Why are remixes not allowed? Suppose there is a
track that fulfills the requirements for submission (especially, it is made in
LMMS). Now, I mak
I've already picked out the tracks I'll be entering. My participation in no
way hinges on this, but I have two questions:
1. How are the proceeds going to be donated in a way that will further LMMS
development?
2. Will winners have some kind of updates about how well the album is
selling on bandca
On 01/13/2014 04:07 PM, Raine M. Ekman wrote:
> Quoting Vesa :
>
>> To kick off this UI graphics rehaul project, here's the SF2 plugin
>> artwork upgrade I've been working on.
>>
>> It turned out to be too much of a pain to just change the title, so I
>> redid most of the graphics. Knobs are the sa
Quoting Vesa :
> To kick off this UI graphics rehaul project, here's the SF2 plugin
> artwork upgrade I've been working on.
>
> It turned out to be too much of a pain to just change the title, so I
> redid most of the graphics. Knobs are the same, as is the layout, no
> reason to change the layout
Sorry, I don't understand. Could you try explaining this more?
On 13 Jan 2014 06:57, "nsk" wrote:
> In my opinion now active FX channel looks not enough, and have to peer.
> I think it is necessary to make more visible, for example as an active
> bank channel group (which A, B, C, D)
>
>
> --
12 matches
Mail list logo
