Re: [LMMS-devel] SDK for instrument creation

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
On 01/17/2014 05:13 AM, Rob Kudla wrote: > So, I'd love to see a powerful modular synth available as part of LMMS, > whether it's Pd, or something lightweight and homegrown that depends on > existing instruments for sound generation, or something else entirely, but > I don't think we need another i

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wake LMMS up!

2014-01-16 Thread roberto giaconia
I'm sorry to do it, but I insist on a name with a meaning. Something like the "OpenTracks Studio" I said before. Sam Duff ha scritto: Yeah, I actually like the name for the new core engine too. Unison on it's own is awesome. Kind regards, Sam Duff On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Tobiasz

Re: [LMMS-devel] SDK for instrument creation

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
On 01/17/2014 05:52 AM, Israel wrote: > http://buzztrax.org/ > found this link from that Wikipedia page you posted > Is this what everyone has been thinking of, for an SDK for instrument > creation? > That's a reimplementation of Buzz. I've yet to try it, as it kind of weirdly uses GStreamer a

Re: [LMMS-devel] SDK for instrument creation

2014-01-16 Thread Israel
http://buzztrax.org/ found this link from that Wikipedia page you posted Is this what everyone has been thinking of, for an SDK for instrument creation? On 01/16/2014 09:13 PM, Rob Kudla wrote: > On 01/16/2014 02:09 AM, Vesa wrote: >> The idea is: a declarative interpreted modular synthesis p

Re: [LMMS-devel] SDK for instrument creation

2014-01-16 Thread Rob Kudla
On 01/16/2014 02:09 AM, Vesa wrote: > The idea is: a declarative interpreted modular synthesis plugin > framework (DIMSPF for short). It kind of sounds like you're looking for something like pd or csound. I like the idea because, as I mentioned in one of my earlier posts, I used to love Buzz on W

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website and LSP2

2014-01-16 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
@Jonathan, If you're asking me, I can take a swing at it. I don't have the history and reputation with the KVR or Zyn community, but I'll try. I know the basics of formation at least. -Tres - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > I think joining

Re: [LMMS-devel] File>Merge... / an option to join songs!

2014-01-16 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
Unrelated, but exporting to MIDI is a must have as well. - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > Right. Later on we could refining this feature for selective merging and > stuff. > On 17 Jan 2014 01:16, "Sam Duff" wrote: > >> A good example of this

Re: [LMMS-devel] Extend Pitch Knob's Range beyond 100 cents / Piano Roll glissando

2014-01-16 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
I agree, the purpose of pitch is to fine tune, but if the automator was granted super powers to extend past that, this would be useful. -Tres - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Sam Duff wrote: > Yeah, I've often wanted this too. The pitch tools need updating in my >

Re: [LMMS-devel] Auto-rename mixer strips

2014-01-16 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
I like this a context menu would do Right click FX channel (i.e 01) in instrument window... - Set FX name to (i.e."0056 Filter Sweep") - Set FX name to ... (input dialog appears with "0056 Filter Sweep" prepopulated) - Open this FX channel in mixer -Tres - tres.finocchi

Re: [LMMS-devel] Make export remember settings

2014-01-16 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
+1 and selecting OGG from one window should switch to OGG on the other. Also irrelevant WAV/OGG settings should automatically gray out on toggle. - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > Every time I render a track I need to change file type, samp

[LMMS-devel] Make export remember settings

2014-01-16 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
Every time I render a track I need to change file type, sampling frequency, bit depth and other export settings from scratch. Please make this window remember the options, and store them in the project file too. -- CenturyL

[LMMS-devel] Changing default start-up project

2014-01-16 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
Blender has an option to save current project as default. Then what you saved is loaded as a starting point everytime you open Blender. It also has a reset to factory option. I've noticed I waste a lot time just removing stuff LMMS throws in at startup. Also once it's easy to remove, maybe we cou

Re: [LMMS-devel] File>Merge... / an option to join songs!

2014-01-16 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
Right. Later on we could refining this feature for selective merging and stuff. On 17 Jan 2014 01:16, "Sam Duff" wrote: > A good example of this would be Blenders project files. You can select > a project file and choose to import certain parts of it or the whole > thing. I think this is a great

Re: [LMMS-devel] File>Merge... / an option to join songs!

2014-01-16 Thread Sam Duff
A good example of this would be Blenders project files. You can select a project file and choose to import certain parts of it or the whole thing. I think this is a great idea. I've often had to close down my current song, open up another one and save instruments out as presets, etc. Kind regards,

Re: [LMMS-devel] Extend Pitch Knob's Range beyond 100 cents / Piano Roll glissando

2014-01-16 Thread Sam Duff
Yeah, I've often wanted this too. The pitch tools need updating in my opinion to be more flexible. Kind regards, Sam Duff On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > Hey, I frequently wish I could turn the pitch knob up 4 tones or such. > How about another knob changing pitch knob'

[LMMS-devel] File>Merge... / an option to join songs!

2014-01-16 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
Someone mentioned it's possible to read another project without cleaning up the workspace. I never knew it's so easy to do (erease one line of code). Please! Let's make this a feature! The merged (lastly loaded) project's clips could be optionally colored to make them easy to spot (as pattern or i

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wake LMMS up!

2014-01-16 Thread Sam Duff
Yeah, I actually like the name for the new core engine too. Unison on it's own is awesome. Kind regards, Sam Duff On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > "Sound Dawn" ("SoDa" for short) maybe? > However my favorite is still "Unison Studio". > > On 16 Jan 2014 11:17, "Hannu Haah

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

2014-01-16 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
I mean duplicating a stereo signal so it can be fed to more than one mixer channels simultaneously. On 15 Jan 2014 23:15, "Tobias Doerffel" wrote: > What do you mean by "split"? Left/Right? > > Toby > > -- CenturyLink Clo

Re: [LMMS-devel] [Lmms-users] LSP replacement

2014-01-16 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
Could we go for a tag system instead of a rigid, limited list of genres users can choose for their music? We could then brainstorm a list of tags to start with. On 15 Jan 2014 23:40, "Jonathan Aquilina" wrote: > Already forked the repo hope to get working on it tomorrow :) > > > > > On Wed, Jan

[LMMS-devel] Extend Pitch Knob's Range beyond 100 cents / Piano Roll glissando

2014-01-16 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
Hey, I frequently wish I could turn the pitch knob up 4 tones or such. How about another knob changing pitch knob's range? Another thing is a way to make a glissando between selected notes that will in fact work just like automating the pitch knob. I think of it this way, because it would work wit

[LMMS-devel] Auto-rename mixer strips

2014-01-16 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
I've realized that I spend a lot of time taping same names for instruments and mixer strips. Could we somehow make it happen automatically? -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Busin

Re: [LMMS-devel] Please add SOLO buttons to FX mixer strips

2014-01-16 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
Thank you, Gurjot! On 16 Jan 2014 16:22, "Gurjot Singh" wrote: > On 16 January 2014 03:54, Tobias Doerffel > wrote: > > This looks like a small nice task which could be done by newcomers as > well > > (important: based on the stable-0.4-new-fx-mixer branch!) as you probably > > only have to edit

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website and LSP2

2014-01-16 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
I think joining forces with ZynAddSubFX people is a good idea. I think Zyn needs a lot of work too, we could motivate each other and learn together. I may ask Paul Nasca what he'd think of that. On 16 Jan 2014 16:18, "Tres Finocchiaro" wrote: > As convenient as this would be, it seems like it wo

Re: [LMMS-devel] SDK for instrument creation

2014-01-16 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
We could ask people from ALSA Modular Synth and Ingen to help us out. On 16 Jan 2014 08:49, "Jonathan Aquilina" wrote: > I think its a good idea, but again with out the SDK this cannot be made a > reality. I would file a feature request for this idea as well as for an SDK > > On Thursday 16 Janua

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wake LMMS up!

2014-01-16 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
"Sound Dawn" ("SoDa" for short) maybe? However my favorite is still "Unison Studio". On 16 Jan 2014 11:17, "Hannu Haahti" wrote: > I had this idea a long time ago. > > A DAW called Dawn. > > Has all the positive implications of a new beginning, possibilities, and > such... no idea if it's taken t

Re: [LMMS-devel] Refactor Engine: Real-Time safety

2014-01-16 Thread Harry van Haaren
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Raine M. Ekman wrote: > I get the point that mutexes are bad... but how bad exactly? I have one > here: > https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/blob/stable-0.4/plugins/opl2/ > opl2instrument.cpp > > There's a QMutex controlling access to the OPL2 emulator, without it LMMS

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vesa and others

2014-01-16 Thread Israel
QML frontend designed to sit on the current backend could negate the need for a full rewrite. I know some things are simply hard coded, and it might be really hard to separate... but it might be worth considering further down the line. On 01/16/2014 04:33 AM, Vesa wrote: > On 01/16/2014 12:23

Re: [LMMS-devel] Correct git URL

2014-01-16 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Thanks for the reminder - all URLs have been fixed! Toby -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environme

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI rework

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
Also note, that for plugin artwork, you don't have to care about the palette guidelines or the other style guidelines. Instruments & plugins are seen as "separate" devices from the main application, and thus they don't necessarily have to be stylistically consistent with the main UI. -

Re: [LMMS-devel] freetype2-error

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
On 01/16/2014 08:49 PM, Johannes Lorenz wrote: > Hi, > > compiling the newest code (I got it by simply using the suggested command > [1], nothing else), I get a compilation error (after cmake's configuration > works fine): > > CMake Error: The source directory "/usr/include/freetype2" does not

Re: [LMMS-devel] freetype2-error

2014-01-16 Thread Lukas W.
Failed to reply to mail list, here's my message again: My fault, I broke it with my with commit 3a456cd1e32e65a1097d044b7c941ee1e5264a55 (pull request: https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/pull/36), sorry. My last commit, which has not been yet merged into the offical repo, fixes this. 2014/1/16 Johannes

Re: [LMMS-devel] Cmake fails with latest stable-0.4

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
On 01/16/2014 08:34 PM, nsk wrote: > 16.01.2014 16:01, Vesa пишет: >> I'm getting a cmake failure, trying to compile the latest from git (as >> of right now), cmake throws this error: >> >> -- checking for module 'freetype2' >> -- found freetype2, version 14.0.8 >> -- Could NOT find Freetype (mis

[LMMS-devel] freetype2-error

2014-01-16 Thread Johannes Lorenz
Hi, compiling the newest code (I got it by simply using the suggested command [1], nothing else), I get a compilation error (after cmake's configuration works fine): CMake Error: The source directory "/usr/include/freetype2" does not appear to contain CMakeLists.txt. Specify --help for usa

Re: [LMMS-devel] Correct git URL

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
For the latest stable 0.4 repo currently in development please clone https://github.com/LMMS/lmms.git On Thursday 16 January 2014 18:34:41 Johannes Lorenz wrote: > Hi, > > sorry I ask this again, but: I think the git URL on the homepage is > deprecated. > > * Can I please have it again, in rep

Re: [LMMS-devel] Please add SOLO buttons to FX mixer strips

2014-01-16 Thread Gurjot Singh
On 16 January 2014 22:59, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for your willingness to take care of this feature! First of all: > please work on top of the stable-0.4-new-fx-mixer-branch as otherwise it'll > be extra work to port the changes to this branch (which is going to be > merged into st

Re: [LMMS-devel] Please add SOLO buttons to FX mixer strips

2014-01-16 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Hi, thanks for your willingness to take care of this feature! First of all: please work on top of the stable-0.4-new-fx-mixer-branch as otherwise it'll be extra work to port the changes to this branch (which is going to be merged into stable-0.4 sooner or later). I propose to add a global flag to

[LMMS-devel] Correct git URL

2014-01-16 Thread Johannes Lorenz
Hi, sorry I ask this again, but: I think the git URL on the homepage is deprecated. * Can I please have it again, in reply to this thread? * Whoever applied for the homepage [1] team, could you please fix it? * The wiki has the same (maybe wrong) URL. [2] Many thanks on advance. Regards, Joh

Re: [LMMS-devel] Please add SOLO buttons to FX mixer strips

2014-01-16 Thread Gurjot Singh
On 16 January 2014 20:52, Gurjot Singh wrote: >> This looks like a small nice task which could be done by newcomers as well >> (important: based on the stable-0.4-new-fx-mixer branch!) as you probably >> only have to edit a few files. If there are volunteers, I can also initially >> give assistanc

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website and LSP2

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Would you like to spear head the effort to get all parties of the below mentioned and any others that we might use in LMMS and see if they could help us with down stream development or some sort of partnership? On Thursday 16 January 2014 10:18:57 Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > As convenient as this

Re: [LMMS-devel] For developer wiki

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Great work Luke :) On Thursday 16 January 2014 16:22:48 Lukas W. wrote: > I finished transferring all remaining pages of the developer > documentation to GitHub (using the prefix "[SF Wiki]"). > I think the articles on SourceForge can now safely be removed. > > 2014/1/16 Paul Giblock : > > Yes,

Re: [LMMS-devel] Please add SOLO buttons to FX mixer strips

2014-01-16 Thread Gurjot Singh
On 16 January 2014 03:54, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > This looks like a small nice task which could be done by newcomers as well > (important: based on the stable-0.4-new-fx-mixer branch!) as you probably > only have to edit a few files. If there are volunteers, I can also initially > give assistance

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI visibility problem

2014-01-16 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
I'm probably the only one with this opinion, but the default gray as a second option is very attractive to me. It also forces the concept of dark vs. light text (which can be reasonably easily detected using lumen calculation) . In addition, it would allow quick transparency testing on the PNGs,

Re: [LMMS-devel] For developer wiki

2014-01-16 Thread Lukas W.
I finished transferring all remaining pages of the developer documentation to GitHub (using the prefix "[SF Wiki]"). I think the articles on SourceForge can now safely be removed. 2014/1/16 Paul Giblock : > Yes, please duplicate all developer documentation to the GitHub wiki, THEN > we can remove

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website and LSP2

2014-01-16 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
As convenient as this would be, it seems like it would complicate structure and formation of LMMS goals. I would vote to team with something like KVR audio or ZynSubAddFX members. They're the community that could take LMMS forward, in my opinion. -Tres - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Thu, Jan

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI visibility problem

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
On 01/16/2014 05:05 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > I would start off small, we can always grow the functionality of what can be > customized as time progresses Well the thing is, at the moment I don't see much use for this kind of functionality - it's likely to only confuse the user and flood us

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website and LSP2

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Thinking about it, I wonder if we could become a part of the blender foundation. Yes its a 3d animation program, but obviously for any animated films they need a sound track etc. What do you guys think Should I contact them? On Thursday 16 January 2014 14:12:12 Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > LMMS Foun

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI visibility problem

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I would start off small, we can always grow the functionality of what can be customized as time progresses On Thursday 16 January 2014 17:04:01 you wrote: > On 01/16/2014 04:54 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > Vesa how hard would it be to make a GUI like front end that will allow > > someone who

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI rework

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Perfect :) maybe you will have some more hands on deck helping to knock those things off the to do list. On Thursday 16 January 2014 16:56:40 Vesa wrote: > On 01/16/2014 04:53 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > Is it possible to link those to the main tracker? > > Done, the [info] post now has lin

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI visibility problem

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
On 01/16/2014 04:54 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Vesa how hard would it be to make a GUI like front end that will allow > someone > who doesnt know css to make modifications to the look and theme of their lmms > install? > Well, it largely depends on how much modifications the users should be

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI visibility problem

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Vesa how hard would it be to make a GUI like front end that will allow someone who doesnt know css to make modifications to the look and theme of their lmms install? On Thursday 16 January 2014 16:53:15 Vesa wrote: > On 01/16/2014 04:51 PM, Gurjot Singh wrote: > > On 16 January 2014 20:14, Vesa

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI visibility problem

2014-01-16 Thread Gurjot Singh
On 16 January 2014 20:23, Vesa wrote: > Well, it's already possible. If the user knows CSS that is. There are > already some user-made themes available. Yes that's one possibility. But I was talking about the GUI tool/option to change the color, theme options something like Blender does. Where th

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI rework

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
On 01/16/2014 04:53 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Is it possible to link those to the main tracker? > Done, the [info] post now has links to both the guidelines post and work assignments list. -- CenturyLink Cloud: The L

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI visibility problem

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
On 01/16/2014 04:51 PM, Gurjot Singh wrote: > On 16 January 2014 20:14, Vesa wrote: >> The status is that instead of using xml, there's now a section in the >> style.css where the palette values are defined. The values are read from >> it using regexp and string manipulation, so it's nothing fancy

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI rework

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Is it possible to link those to the main tracker? On Thursday 16 January 2014 16:45:33 Vesa wrote: > On 01/16/2014 04:43 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > With all the tasks pending for UI work, woudl it be possible to get those > > put in the issue tracker. As an enhancement request and then that

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI visibility problem

2014-01-16 Thread Gurjot Singh
On 16 January 2014 20:14, Vesa wrote: > The status is that instead of using xml, there's now a section in the > style.css where the palette values are defined. The values are read from > it using regexp and string manipulation, so it's nothing fancy really. > Old themes (including the 0.4.15 defau

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI rework

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
On 01/16/2014 04:43 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > With all the tasks pending for UI work, woudl it be possible to get those put > in the issue tracker. As an enhancement request and then that way those that > want to contribute can grab an enhancement and implement/fix it. > Already done. There

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI visibility problem

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
On 01/16/2014 04:39 PM, Gurjot Singh wrote: > WOW! The new look does look awesome. Keep up the good work. :) Thanks, we will :) > > You were asking about the xml input for color coding. What's the > status on that? Is it gonna be used or not? > The status is that instead of using xml, there's n

[LMMS-devel] UI rework

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
With all the tasks pending for UI work, woudl it be possible to get those put in the issue tracker. As an enhancement request and then that way those that want to contribute can grab an enhancement and implement/fix it. Regards ---

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI visibility problem

2014-01-16 Thread Gurjot Singh
On 16 January 2014 20:01, Vesa wrote: > That... is not how the UI is supposed to look at the moment. That is a > glitch. (you didn't seriously think we were making everything white, did > you?) Ok. I was just confirming. That's why I didn't file an issue for this. > I'll even tell you what cause

Re: [LMMS-devel] Revamping the wiki

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
That is what I meant, the below would be good to have in the wiki. On Thursday 16 January 2014 15:44:35 Vesa wrote: > On 01/16/2014 03:35 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > Do you know how the submit patch method works in github? If yes the update > > that page with the new steps to submit a patch t

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI visibility problem

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
On 01/16/2014 04:15 PM, Gurjot Singh wrote: > Hi, > @UI development team > > The following is the screenshot of the latest build of the stable-0.4 > branch code. > http://postimg.org/image/ki30a5g77/ > > 1.)As you can see that it is quite difficult to read the names of > tracks in both Song-Editor

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI visibility problem

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Gurjot, would you mind submitting a bug in the issue tracker in github please. On Thursday 16 January 2014 19:45:59 Gurjot Singh wrote: > Hi, > @UI development team > > The following is the screenshot of the latest build of the stable-0.4 > branch code. > http://postimg.org/image/ki30a5g77/ > >

Re: [LMMS-devel] For developer wiki

2014-01-16 Thread Paul Giblock
Yes, please duplicate all developer documentation to the GitHub wiki, THEN we can remove the articles from the SF.net wiki and do cross-references between the two platforms. The GitHub wiki is nice for developers since it lets us reference bugs, milestones, authors, etc. However, the "user" wiki is

Re: [LMMS-devel] Revamping the wiki

2014-01-16 Thread Lukas W.
I just finished writing the guide on how to submit contributions (still called "Submitting a patch", maybe a new name would be more fitting). Maybe someone could quickly review it, as English is not my native language. 2014/1/16 Lukas W. : > I'm actually already writing a guide on contributing th

[LMMS-devel] UI visibility problem

2014-01-16 Thread Gurjot Singh
Hi, @UI development team The following is the screenshot of the latest build of the stable-0.4 branch code. http://postimg.org/image/ki30a5g77/ 1.)As you can see that it is quite difficult to read the names of tracks in both Song-Editor area as well as Beat+Bassline Editor. 2.)You can't really se

Re: [LMMS-devel] For developer wiki

2014-01-16 Thread Lukas W.
I would rather only move the developer documentation to GitHub and let the user doc on SF until there is a new place to host the user wiki. The user wiki should link to the developer wiki and vice versa. I think the GitHub wiki is not the place a user would try to find information. 2014/1/16 Jonat

Re: [LMMS-devel] Revamping the wiki

2014-01-16 Thread Lukas W.
I'm actually already writing a guide on contributing through GitHub. ;) A link to the roadmap is present, the page just has to be created and filled. 2014/1/16 Jonathan Aquilina : > Sorry if this arrives a 2nd time i used the wrong outgoing mail server and I > was not sure if the email would be e

Re: [LMMS-devel] Revamping the wiki

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
On 01/16/2014 03:35 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Do you know how the submit patch method works in github? If yes the update > that page with the new steps to submit a patch through git hub. There is no "submit patch" feature as such. The workflow is different: you're supposed to fork the entire

Re: [LMMS-devel] Latest code errors while running LMMS

2014-01-16 Thread Gurjot Singh
On 16 January 2014 19:06, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > I would file a bug for this. Actually I just wanted to confirm. I'm rebuilding the project once again and if the problem still persists then I'll file this as an issue. -- Gurjot Singh Blog: http://bhattigurjot.wordpress.com ---

Re: [LMMS-devel] Latest code errors while running LMMS

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I would file a bug for this. On Thursday 16 January 2014 19:03:38 Gurjot Singh wrote: > Hi, > I'm getting the following errors while running the latest code. > > Error 1: > The plugin "tripleoscillator" wasn't found or could not be loaded! > Reason: "Cannot load library > /home/scott/lmms/target/

Re: [LMMS-devel] Revamping the wiki

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Sorry if this arrives a 2nd time i used the wrong outgoing mail server and I was not sure if the email would be excepted. The other is my business email address so if you or anyone needs IT services let me know. I think a road map should still be there even if its blank. This is something that

Re: [LMMS-devel] For developer wiki

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
If you do that where will users turn for information. Are you saying move all of that as well over to the github wiki? On Thursday 16 January 2014 12:37:10 Lukas W. wrote: > Wouldn't it be better to just remove what is on the SF wiki and > instead link to the github wiki then? Only the developer

[LMMS-devel] Latest code errors while running LMMS

2014-01-16 Thread Gurjot Singh
Hi, I'm getting the following errors while running the latest code. Error 1: The plugin "tripleoscillator" wasn't found or could not be loaded! Reason: "Cannot load library /home/scott/lmms/target/lib/lmms/tripleoscillator: (/home/scott/lmms/target/lib/lmms/libtripleoscillator.so: cannot open shar

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website and LSP2

2014-01-16 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
LMMS Foundation? Isn't it gonna cost a lot of time and money to start and run? Maybe I'd be sufficient to first find an existing one to look over LMMS. I wonder what is optimal. Maybe separating from it later would be problematic, and that's why we should stay "independent"? However I think coope

Re: [LMMS-devel] Real Time safety

2014-01-16 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
Coming from the windows side of composition, the VST performance on playback is something that suffers currently. Setting the vst process priority above LMMS helps considerably, bit this chopping and latency is something that can drastically change the experience when composing. -Tres On Jan 16,

Re: [LMMS-devel] For developer wiki

2014-01-16 Thread Lukas W.
Wouldn't it be better to just remove what is on the SF wiki and instead link to the github wiki then? Only the developer documentation, of course. 2014/1/16 Jonathan Aquilina : > Unless Toby or someone else beats me to it I will add you on SF to be able to > edit the wiki. > > On Thursday 16 Janua

Re: [LMMS-devel] Revamping the wiki

2014-01-16 Thread Lukas W.
I'm done transferring, adapting and restructuring most of the articles. Pages I left out: "Roadmap" as it just seems like a huge mess to me, "Developer discussion" (contains just one link to an issue on sf), and "Submitting a patch", which in my opinion should be rewritten to fit the new possibilit

Re: [LMMS-devel] For developer wiki

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Unless Toby or someone else beats me to it I will add you on SF to be able to edit the wiki. On Thursday 16 January 2014 12:16:23 Lukas W. wrote: > Added the link to the github wiki. Thanks for noting :) > I have no access to the sourceforge user wiki though. > > 2014/1/15 Jonathan Aquilina : >

Re: [LMMS-devel] For developer wiki

2014-01-16 Thread Lukas W.
Added the link to the github wiki. Thanks for noting :) I have no access to the sourceforge user wiki though. 2014/1/15 Jonathan Aquilina : > @Luke > > Can we get this added to the developer and user wiki wiki. > http://askubuntu.com/questions/107230/what-happened-to-the-ia32-libs-package > > Just

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website and LSP2

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
A foundation is something I do want to setup for this project eventually. I need to discuss logistics with toby. On Thursday 16 January 2014 13:30:16 Sam Duff wrote: > Good points Tres, and I agree. > > Also, if we're going to look at purchasing domain names and hosting, it > would be worth look

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website and LSP2

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Regarding the domain, I think that would be something you would need to discuss with tony. If you are willing to sponsor the domain at this stage I woudl say go for it, but its best you discuss it with him On Wednesday 15 January 2014 21:01:09 you wrote: > @Sam, > > I rose this same CMS questio

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vesa and others

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
On 01/16/2014 12:23 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Thing is alot of these apps are also releasing a mobile version. Like > garageband on OSX allows one to compose a song and if i am correct save it to > the cloud to be opened on a computer through iCloud. Yes, but just because others are doing s

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website and LSP2

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Hey sam sorry for the delay on this. Actually Toby was the one that wants to use this frame work and Its quite nice and probably the best documented out there. I would start by setting up a tutorial project and working through the tutorials so you have an idea of what is going on. Feel free to

Re: [LMMS-devel] Refactor Engine: Real-Time safety

2014-01-16 Thread Raine M. Ekman
Citerar Harry van Haaren : > To start a constructive discussion, i'd like to introduce some content, > which perhaps > is already known to some developers. > > Basics of RT programming: > http://www.rossbencina.com/code/real-time-audio-programming-101-time-waits-for-nothing Might as well ask as wh

Re: [LMMS-devel] Cmake fails with latest stable-0.4

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
On 01/16/2014 12:17 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Try this run sudo apt-get build-dep lmms that will install anything you might > be missing dependency wise. That should solve the problem. I usually do taht > on kubuntu before i compile anything from source. > No, that's not it. I have all the

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vesa and others

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Thing is alot of these apps are also releasing a mobile version. Like garageband on OSX allows one to compose a song and if i am correct save it to the cloud to be opened on a computer through iCloud. Again you are right to say hey i just got this idea while on the bus get out the tablet tap i

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wake LMMS up!

2014-01-16 Thread Hannu Haahti
I had this idea a long time ago. A DAW called Dawn. Has all the positive implications of a new beginning, possibilities, and such... no idea if it's taken though. -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Servi

Re: [LMMS-devel] Cmake fails with latest stable-0.4

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Try this run sudo apt-get build-dep lmms that will install anything you might be missing dependency wise. That should solve the problem. I usually do taht on kubuntu before i compile anything from source. On Thursday 16 January 2014 12:09:29 you wrote: > On 01/16/2014 12:01 PM, Jonathan Aquilina

Re: [LMMS-devel] Cmake fails with latest stable-0.4

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
On 01/16/2014 12:01 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Out of curiosity what version of make is there. I know with make 3.81 there > was an issue wiht multithreading the compliation process. Libreoffice had > that > issue and they have submitted a patch to upstream to get that issue solved. > > I do

Re: [LMMS-devel] Cmake fails with latest stable-0.4

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Out of curiosity what version of make is there. I know with make 3.81 there was an issue wiht multithreading the compliation process. Libreoffice had that issue and they have submitted a patch to upstream to get that issue solved. On Thursday 16 January 2014 11:06:39 Vesa wrote: > On 01/16/2014

Re: [LMMS-devel] Cmake fails with latest stable-0.4

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
On 01/16/2014 11:02 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > Hi, > > did you install all freetype2 headers? Which version of CMake and > which distribution/version do you have? > > Toby > Linux mint 13 32bit. Freetype2 headers and Cmake are installed as these packages: libfreetype6-dev, version 2.4.8-1ubuntu2

Re: [LMMS-devel] Cmake fails with latest stable-0.4

2014-01-16 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Hi, did you install all freetype2 headers? Which version of CMake and which distribution/version do you have? Toby -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing Cent

[LMMS-devel] Cmake fails with latest stable-0.4

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
I'm getting a cmake failure, trying to compile the latest from git (as of right now), cmake throws this error: -- checking for module 'freetype2' -- found freetype2, version 14.0.8 -- Could NOT find Freetype (missing: FREETYPE_INCLUDE_DIRS) (found version "14.0.8") CMake Error at /usr/share/c

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wake LMMS up!

2014-01-16 Thread Tobias Doerffel
All of them seem to be taken already :-( -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wake LMMS up!

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
On 01/16/2014 10:37 AM, Vesa wrote: > On 01/16/2014 10:30 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: >> Idea I had this morning: >> >> suonamix (or SuonaMix, suonaMix) >> >> -> suona = italian for "sound" (or latin for despotism ;-), sounare=to >> sound, to play (an instrument) >> -> mix - I don't have to explain

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wake LMMS up!

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
On 01/16/2014 10:30 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > Idea I had this morning: > > suonamix (or SuonaMix, suonaMix) > > -> suona = italian for "sound" (or latin for despotism ;-), sounare=to > sound, to play (an instrument) > -> mix - I don't have to explain ;-) > -> similarities with "dynamics" > > An

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wake LMMS up!

2014-01-16 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Idea I had this morning: suonamix (or SuonaMix, suonaMix) -> suona = italian for "sound" (or latin for despotism ;-), sounare=to sound, to play (an instrument) -> mix - I don't have to explain ;-) -> similarities with "dynamics" An alternative with a Swedish touch (maybe easier to pronounce): s

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vesa and others

2014-01-16 Thread Vesa
On 01/16/2014 09:59 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > What I am trying to say is that we can do somethign similar where we can > allow > people to compose music and make changes to a track on the mobile device and > it will appear in lmms. So basically you dont need to work directly on your > pc.

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vesa and others

2014-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
What I am trying to say is that we can do somethign similar where we can allow people to compose music and make changes to a track on the mobile device and it will appear in lmms. So basically you dont need to work directly on your pc. On Thursday 16 January 2014 09:56:33 Vesa wrote: > On 01/16