[LMMS-devel] regression testing

Hey guys I feel seeing as things are moving so quickly that we need to look at setting up regression testing. What do you think? @Lukas can you see if there is something that easily integrates with github if not then let me know and we start looking at other methods to start regression testing --

Re: [LMMS-devel] Testing the new build

Found a bug: The knobs on the AudioFile processor seem to have some problems when the start and end knobs have been moved and the start point overlaps the end point. In some cases the knobs just become unusable and you have to fix it with the preview-widow start/end lines. -Tres - tres.finocchi

[LMMS-devel] Testing the new build

Had about an hour to test the new version tonight... feel like every time I open up something, I get a christmas present, like this new ZynAddSubFX artwork! Also really like the artwork inside the FX stackers. Kudos. Back on topic... Only issue I had was VSTs wouldn't load. [image: Inline imag

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

> > *[zoom/note/scale/chord:] Those icons have been assigned to John Serafino > and we'll just have to wait and see what he makes of them.* > Ok. The mock-up is just black boxes and should take just a few minutes. Let me know if you'd like me to render them, I don't have the source, so I'd need s

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

On Jan 27, 2014 7:48 PM, "Tobiasz Karoń" wrote: > > or too salty. > Hahhaha -- WatchGuard Dimension instantly turns raw network data into actionable security intelligence. It gives you real-time visual feedback on key se

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

Right. Too much always hurts - even too loud, too bright, too saturated or too salty. 2014-01-28 Vesa > On 01/28/2014 01:47 AM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > > > > With sound louder always seem better (even subconsiously) - maybe with > > visuals the more saturated and contrasted always seems better t

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

On 01/27/2014 09:43 PM, Vesa wrote: > >> >> * Mismatched dimensions for the instrument icons cause some visual >> spacing issues for the instrument text. >> > > This is something that needs to be fixed in the code (or CSS, I'm not > sure yet). I'll look into it. Hmm, I've been looking throug

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

On 01/28/2014 01:47 AM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > > With sound louder always seem better (even subconsiously) - maybe with > visuals the more saturated and contrasted always seems better too? It's very much dependent on the purpose and situation... if you take it too far, too much saturation sort of

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

Wow - this is Honey... sweettt, liiitl, aahhh! However If you now made the green this saturated too... I think green would win again ;) With sound louder always seem better (even subconsiously) - maybe with visuals the more saturated and contrasted always seems better too? 2014-01-27 Lu

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

It might be good to publicize the vote on the forums, so the users and enthusiasts can also take part in this community effort. I guess you could post it on all the other outlets (social media, blogs, etc...) Maybe we could get some news sites in on the vote, too... Since the 1.0.0 version is al

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

Wow, that's heaps better! Good job. =) My only thoughts on the poll are that the people who liked the bright yellow but saw the pale orange would have voted green since it looked markedly better. Whether or not everyone thinks we should re-vote is not up to me. Kind regards, Sam Duff On Tue, J

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

Now I'm running the new installer and the version number displayed is "0.4.15", however the logo is from 1.0.0 :) 2014-01-27 Tobiasz Karoń > Oh man. It was a silly error - I accidentally launched the wrong installer > :D I had 0.4.15 in the downloads folder already. > > > 2014-01-27 Tobiasz Kar

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

Oh man. It was a silly error - I accidentally launched the wrong installer :D I had 0.4.15 in the downloads folder already. 2014-01-27 Tobiasz Karoń > I'll download it and start over. > > > 2014-01-27 Tobias Doerffel > > 2014-01-27 Tobiasz Karoń >> >> Btw: the installer's information and grap

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

I redid it with bolder colors. Now the question is: If you really think this could have changed how people vote(d), what do you suggest? Re-initiating the poll and let everyone vote again? 2014-01-27 Sam Duff : > You certainly weren't wrong in terms of the design - that is awesome and > you've don

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

I'll download it and start over. 2014-01-27 Tobias Doerffel > 2014-01-27 Tobiasz Karoń > > Btw: the installer's information and graphics are outdated: >> > > You definitely somehow downloaded an old installer. I just downloaded the > installer from the URL I posted. The title graphics in the i

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

You certainly weren't wrong in terms of the design - that is awesome and you've done a great job making it an SVG. I'm only referring to the colour. The only reason I linked to the bright ones was to show you that these colours are far brighter and not washed out. Kind regards, Sam Duff On Tue,

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

Yeah I can see they all have some pretty intense colours, you don't have to link me to every single one. I just used the one in the repo, thinking that this was the preferred one. Was I wrong? 2014-01-27 Sam Duff : > Yeah, and this one: > > https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/oEggrD-wOMhUocIJ8IUsUPt

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

Yeah, and this one: https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/oEggrD-wOMhUocIJ8IUsUPtNGkU9PjxQK8qdI3_CPRZa2XjrKGXuinaOeB0ubrQNJw=s190 And this one: https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/7WMTF_PkOkJnfUT1JLKEZHXOOo8wP9Yzq_0-F4D0XQNKYT6HrW9VEyzJUVE_yFuTjg=s190 and this one: https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/v2

Re: [LMMS-devel] My remix of Tres' Green Spash

Allright - ou can send them to me and I can drop them there and post when I'm online. I'm not sure who wrote it but he insisted so we keep the mail size down. I started using JPGs for in-mail to reduce the size. 2014-01-27 Vesa > On 01/27/2014 11:50 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > > I'd like to int

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

Ah I see, there are two versions. One lighter and one bolder one. You are referring to this one? https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/QjTDrAOJR-b-uApybhsTrP5cwKy1-DfPtN3x3_ofzPLYsFxvNeAGqyWrxA0HP7_bCg=w1793-h843 For creating the icon in Inkscape I (quite exactly) copied the colours from this version:

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

2014-01-27 Tobiasz Karoń > Btw: the installer's information and graphics are outdated: > You definitely somehow downloaded an old installer. I just downloaded the installer from the URL I posted. The title graphics in the installer have the new logo already. So please double check it before inst

Re: [LMMS-devel] My remix of Tres' Green Spash

On 01/27/2014 11:50 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > I'd like to integrate your hue of green onto my version and also port > that cool gradient on "LMMS". > Would you upload your XCF file to Google Drive and link it here? I don't have a google account so that's unfortunately not possible. I can woof it

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

The main thing I think needs improving is the colour. The colour of the yellow icons you linked to are a lot bolder and more striking than the pastel orange that you've chosen. Kind regards, Sam Duff On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Lukas W. wrote: > Hi Sam, > > The original drawings can be f

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

On 01/27/2014 11:39 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > @Vesa, > > Here's what I'm suggesting for the zoom/note/scale/chord: > Those icons have been assigned to John Serafino and we'll just have to wait and see what he makes of them. > > A mock-up of the play and record buttons that makes them less > "

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

Hi Sam, The original drawings can be found here: https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B-1kciTMrTBZaHg3YjVwVmtqVTg&usp=sharing However, for creating an icon, a svg version was needed. That's why I recreated it in Inkscape, trying my best to replicate the look of it. See the discussion on GitHub:

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

Yeah, just confirming that this vote seems a little biased since the yellow is nothing like the version we liked from the original logo drawings. Kind regards, Sam Duff On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Sam Duff wrote: > It appears that the yellow has been dulled down a lot too. Is there a > r

Re: [LMMS-devel] My remix of Tres' Green Spash

I'd like to integrate your hue of green onto my version and also port that cool gradient on "LMMS". Would you upload your XCF file to Google Drive and link it here? 2014-01-27 Vesa > On 01/27/2014 04:49 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > > Here's the original file: > https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

It appears that the yellow has been dulled down a lot too. Is there a reason? Kind regards, Sam Duff On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > I casted my vote. Green please! > > > 2014-01-27 Vesa > > On 01/27/2014 11:30 PM, Lukas W. wrote: >> > Oh, I included a "wrong" version

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

Good idea to replace the LEDs with M / S buttons - it's way more intuitive. 2014-01-27 Tres Finocchiaro > @Vesa, > > Here's what I'm suggesting for the zoom/note/scale/chord: > [image: Inline image 2] > > A mock-up of the play and record buttons that makes them less "hollow". > Also the "auto-

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

@Vesa, Here's what I'm suggesting for the zoom/note/scale/chord: [image: Inline image 2] A mock-up of the play and record buttons that makes them less "hollow". Also the "auto-scroll" is not as bright [image: Inline image 4] Mute/Solo mock-up: [image: Inline image 5] -Tres - tres.finocchi...

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

I casted my vote. Green please! 2014-01-27 Vesa > On 01/27/2014 11:30 PM, Lukas W. wrote: > > Oh, I included a "wrong" version in the form. Using the palette green, > > it would look like this. > > > > Yep I definitely like that one. > > > ---

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

I just changed the green icon in the poll to the new one. If anyone who has already voted for the green one now says "Ugh, now I don't like it anymore!", just tell me so I can include that in the final "calculation". Also: While it is technically possible to vote multiple times as the IP is not st

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

On 01/27/2014 11:30 PM, Lukas W. wrote: > Oh, I included a "wrong" version in the form. Using the palette green, > it would look like this. > Yep I definitely like that one. -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

On 01/27/2014 11:13 PM, John Serafino wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Vesa > wrote: > >> * The note scales/chords icons don't fit the theme at all >> (perhaps they're not done yet) >> > > With time running out, I didn't do much for them, just a qu

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

Oh, I included a "wrong" version in the form. Using the palette green, it would look like this. 2014-01-27 Vesa : > On 01/27/2014 11:13 PM, Lukas W. wrote: >> Hey guys, >> >> After having discussed this topic for quite some time now, we have >> come up with one version/shape that I attached to thi

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

It pretends to be - but internally it's the latest version ;-) -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Envi

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

On 01/27/2014 11:13 PM, Lukas W. wrote: > Hey guys, > > After having discussed this topic for quite some time now, we have > come up with one version/shape that I attached to this email. > Now it's just one question that is still open: Will it be orange or > will it be green? (Green mainly to fit t

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Vesa wrote: > >- The note scales/chords icons don't fit the theme at all (perhaps >they're not done yet) > > > With time running out, I didn't do much for them, just a quick > recolourization/hue adjustment. Possibly we'll get new ones for next > version..

[LMMS-devel] Vote for the new icon

Hey guys, After having discussed this topic for quite some time now, we have come up with one version/shape that I attached to this email. Now it's just one question that is still open: Will it be orange or will it be green? (Green mainly to fit the rest of LMMS's appearance as I understood it) I

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

Tobias, I've installed this build just now in Wine. And it's really LMMS* 0.4.15*. 2014-01-27 Tobias Doerffel > Hi, > > A build from yesterday is available at > > http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~doto/lmms/lmms-1.0.0-rc-win32.exe > > however it's not the actual RC but just an intermediate build.

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

Hard to tell, lots of them. I feel like two trees of versions that depend an themselves got mixed somehow. 2014-01-27 Vesa > On 01/27/2014 10:12 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > > I'm not sure if you understood me, Tobias. I'm not trying to compile > > Qt, but I need Qt development packages to compil

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

On 01/27/2014 10:12 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > I'm not sure if you understood me, Tobias. I'm not trying to compile > Qt, but I need Qt development packages to compile LMMS. > > There's a dependency conflict in Ubuntu Studio 12.04 LTS. I'd have to > remove half of packages I have to install differe

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

Ok, but if you can't install libqt4-dev something is messed up with your system ;-) BTW the icon in the NSIS installer has been updated already, just didn't do a fresh upload. The version information will be updated automatically when we update the version globally in CMakeLists.txt. -

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki page for contributors

On 27 January 2014 19:52, Vesa wrote: > On 01/27/2014 09:24 PM, David Gerard wrote: >> Yes, it may create a copyright violation - but it still doesn't >> implicitly constitute a release under the licence. - d. > Why not? What are you basing this opinion on? > Arguably, if one writes code for a GP

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

You don't have to compile Qt4 on your own, simply install it from your distribution. There will be no "shipped" version as LMMS needs to be packaged just like any other program specifically for every distribution. -- Centur

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

Is there a Linux build availabile too? I can't install Qt libs to compile myself - would need another distro. 2014-01-27 Vesa > Thanks for your feedback, Tres! Very much appreciated. I'll address some > of those points here: > > > On 01/27/2014 09:11 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > > >- Ne

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki page for contributors

On 01/27/2014 09:24 PM, David Gerard wrote: > Yes, it may create a copyright violation - but it still doesn't > implicitly constitute a release under the licence. - d. Why not? What are you basing this opinion on? Arguably, if one writes code for a GPL-licensed software, then send that code to a

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

Thanks for your feedback, Tres! Very much appreciated. I'll address some of those points here: On 01/27/2014 09:11 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > * New icon bleeds a bit into the OS, needs better border. > I did say it should have a drop shadow... > > * Scrollbars seem a big bright consideri

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki page for contributors

On 27 January 2014 18:53, Vesa wrote: > On 01/27/2014 08:04 PM, David Gerard wrote: >> On 27 January 2014 18:02, Vesa wrote: >>> I don't think it matters for code contributions, as the code is already >>> under GPL, and one can only modify that code under the terms of the GPL >>> license, so any

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

Thank you kindly Toby. This is fantastic. No bugs to report yet, I'll test more extensively tonight. As far as features/visual: *Some initial pros:* - The new beat/bassline editor behavior that underlines the note when it's dimmed is a fantastic addition. - New instruments!! OpulenZ,

Re: [LMMS-devel] My remix of Tres' Green Spash

On 01/27/2014 04:49 PM, Tobiasz Karon' wrote: > Here's the original file: > https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4PpvIwHd1U0TUlzSmFvWUh6N28/edit > > Here's what I did to it: And here's what I did to it: -- CenturyLink Cloud:

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki page for contributors

On 01/27/2014 08:04 PM, David Gerard wrote: > On 27 January 2014 18:02, Vesa wrote: > >> I don't think it matters for code contributions, as the code is already >> under GPL, and one can only modify that code under the terms of the GPL >> license, so any contributions to the source code implicitly

Re: [LMMS-devel] My remix of Tres' Green Spash

The broken splash is a known issue in previous versions and recently has been fixed so please use a recent version of LMMS for "testing splash". Toby -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

Hi, A build from yesterday is available at http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~doto/lmms/lmms-1.0.0-rc-win32.exe however it's not the actual RC but just an intermediate build. I'm working on getting the 64 bit version built Toby --

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki page for contributors

@David You are actually wrong there. They also have a page on the wiki somewhere. On Monday 27 January 2014 18:04:54 David Gerard wrote: > On 27 January 2014 18:02, Vesa wrote: > > I don't think it matters for code contributions, as the code is already > > under GPL, and one can only modify that

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki page for contributors

On 27 January 2014 18:02, Vesa wrote: > I don't think it matters for code contributions, as the code is already > under GPL, and one can only modify that code under the terms of the GPL > license, so any contributions to the source code implicitly become GPL. Copyright isn't actually "viral" li

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki page for contributors

On 01/27/2014 07:59 PM, perret.yannick wrote: > Le 27/01/2014 18:40, Jonathan Aquilina a écrit : >> @lukas can you create a page for these statements please. >> >> Toby before merging pull requests can you make sure those that make the >> contributions are on that page and if not ask them to send a

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki page for contributors

On 01/27/2014 07:34 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > How does the GPL license treat attribution? From conversations on the > Pidgin mailing list I was under the impressions once GPL always GPL, > which strips attribution for images, since it's a software license and > images are released in binary fo

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki page for contributors

Le 27/01/2014 18:40, Jonathan Aquilina a écrit : > @lukas can you create a page for these statements please. > > Toby before merging pull requests can you make sure those that make the > contributions are on that page and if not ask them to send a statement to the > mailing list please. > I recentl

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki page for contributors

I would assume this is assumed, making assumptions, which is bad to do... :) Seriously though, this should go without saying, and if authors want credit, you've been very open about getting them on the about/credits page. -Tres - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Jon

Re: [LMMS-devel] UI graphical rehaul project

On 01/27/2014 04:09 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > I've made a brushed metal rendered texture (GIMP + Blender). > > Maybe it'll work as a background for some plug-in artwork? It looks good, very nice. But for a background texture a bit too busy maybe... Try writing small text on that background and s

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki page for contributors

How does the GPL license treat attribution? From conversations on the Pidgin mailing list I was under the impressions once GPL always GPL, which strips attribution for images, since it's a software license and images are released in binary form, stripping them of anything considered as "source cod

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki page for contributors

@lukas can you create a page for these statements please. Toby before merging pull requests can you make sure those that make the contributions are on that page and if not ask them to send a statement to the mailing list please. On Monday 27 January 2014 12:13:49 Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > I wou

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki page for contributors

There's what makes sense, and there there's legal nonsense. Legally, its best to have statements from contributors. Otherwise they can come back later and say "I didn't mean that you could distribute it without royalties. Did I ever specifically say you could? No? Then you've been violating my copy

Re: [LMMS-devel] My remix of Tres' Green Spash

As far as permission, I hope everything I contribute (as well as other artists) is assumed to be public domain, so yes. -Tres - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Ignore the part about sending me the image I just noticed it is attached. > >

[LMMS-devel] Wiki page for contributors

Attention all developers. Can we get a statement saying that you release all contributions to LMMS in agreement with the licenses of the project for all contributions to the project. Do you guys agree we should do this? --

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

@lukas Can you look into getting builds with Travis and see with Toby where we can upload the stuff to. He did mention he has ftp space where we can upload the builds. On Monday 27 January 2014 09:44:21 Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > In fear of being Ostracized (half kidding), is there a Windows bui

Re: [LMMS-devel] My remix of Tres' Green Spash

Love it as well. @tres and unfa Do I have permission to use this on my blog? If yes can you send me the image please. On Monday 27 January 2014 08:51:47 John Serafino wrote: > Love it. > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > > Here's the original file: > > https://docs.go

Re: [LMMS-devel] My remix of Tres' Green Spash

Ignore the part about sending me the image I just noticed it is attached. Not one of my evenings its turning out to be :( On Monday 27 January 2014 08:51:47 John Serafino wrote: > Love it. > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > > Here's the original file: > > https://docs.

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS is really starting to look professional.

In fear of being Ostracized (half kidding), is there a Windows build available to do testing on yet? Not sure if CI is hooked up with mingw yet, but I'd be happy to test for stability, etc. I know Toby specifically mentioned he wanted testing against the MIDI changes, and I could spearhead this Q

Re: [LMMS-devel] SDK for instrument creation

No. This is only theory. I've got messed up package dependencies on my system and some stuff won't install. Compiling a lot of packages that require certain (Qt) libraries for example is impossible. At least for as far as I can do. 2014-01-27 Jonathan Aquilina > Unfa have you given it a try ye

Re: [LMMS-devel] Plugin delay compensation

On 01/27/2014 02:15 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > Does LMMS have a way to sample-align tracks that have different amount > of effects stacked? > This could also be connected with the Time Offset function - kind of > auto-time offset. I think they already do get aligned when rendering? When playing re

Re: [LMMS-devel] 5.8 milliseconds audiobuffer

On 01/27/2014 01:25 PM, Paul Wayper wrote: > On 27/01/14 15:46, Vesa wrote: > [lots of good stuff, finishing with] > > Listen, you probably mean well, but it's just not a good idea. We > > shouldn't waste limited resources on implementing something that only > > gives us a less efficient solution t

Re: [LMMS-devel] SDK for instrument creation

Unfa have you given it a try yet? On Monday 27 January 2014 12:38:59 Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > I've found something interesting about Ingen modular system: > http://drobilla.net/2013/06/08/ingen-as-lv2-in-ardour/ > > They say one can make lv2 plugins with it. > > > 2014-01-17 Rob Kudla > > > On

[LMMS-devel] Plugin delay compensation

Does LMMS have a way to sample-align tracks that have different amount of effects stacked? This could also be connected with the Time Offset function - kind of auto-time offset. -- Tobiasz *unfa* -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GIT/MU/P d->-- s+:-(--)> a? C++(+++)>$ ULC+(++)>$ !P? L

Re: [LMMS-devel] I want to give my most polished tracks source for LMMS demo projects

He switched to Ableton for both producing and live shows. He still sometimes uses LMMS. He used mixxx for his live shows. -Uroš On 27 January 2014 12:46, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > I've heard he switched to Ableton recently. Maybe just for live > performaces. If not - I hope we'll get him back :D >

Re: [LMMS-devel] rakarrack integration

In version 0.6.1 that I have, multiple outputs are not supported. I think that the most reasonable way would be to allow users to use Rakarrack as it is - and to load their presets into it. Using one instance and routing all effects in-out will give us a incomplete solution. I think the power of

Re: [LMMS-devel] rakarrack integration

On 01/27/2014 01:21 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > > > It would be really cool to have Rakkarack applicable as an effect in > the mixer. However I have no idea how to do it. Plus running a few of > Rakarracks could be CPU-heavy. > Then it would probably need to be done in a way that the effect plugins

Re: [LMMS-devel] I want to give my most polished tracks source for LMMS demo projects

I've heard he switched to Ableton recently. Maybe just for live performaces. If not - I hope we'll get him back :D 2014-01-27 Tres Finocchiaro > Just messaged Macrowave on Facebook to see if he has any tracks to offer. > Not sure if his label (Badd Records) owns any of them, but I'd be honored

Re: [LMMS-devel] SDK for instrument creation

I've found something interesting about Ingen modular system: http://drobilla.net/2013/06/08/ingen-as-lv2-in-ardour/ They say one can make lv2 plugins with it. 2014-01-17 Rob Kudla > On 01/17/2014 02:29 AM, Vesa wrote: > > I'm not entirely familiar with CSound or the others, but it seems fairly

Re: [LMMS-devel] 5.8 milliseconds audiobuffer

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 27/01/14 15:46, Vesa wrote: [lots of good stuff, finishing with] > Listen, you probably mean well, but it's just not a good idea. We > shouldn't waste limited resources on implementing something that only > gives us a less efficient solution than

Re: [LMMS-devel] rakarrack integration

Rakarrack is a highly configurable effects rack - a all-in-one guitar effects processor (the best I've seen in the GNU world). Here's a video of Rakarrack in action (you can play it in the background and read on my message): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Jb7BEsHwLc It's not a synthesizer like Z