Hey guys I think its an appropriate time to discuss the release cycle as
well as How long are we going to support a version before we end of life it.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts about this.
--
Jonathan Aquilina
I've got a coin in my pocket. I can generate boolean results for choosing
between names if you like. ;)
Kind regards,
Sam Duff
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Bill Y. wrote:
> We'll never get a 100% unanimous vote, we could always compile a list of
> the top 20 names, and take a vote, then r
We'll never get a 100% unanimous vote, we could always compile a list of
the top 20 names, and take a vote, then repeat it with the top 5 to pick a
winner. That will give everyone an opportunity.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Rob Kudla wrote:
> On 02/04/2014 06:06 PM, Vesa wrote:
> > On 02/05/
On 02/04/2014 06:06 PM, Vesa wrote:
> On 02/05/2014 12:39 AM, Sam Duff wrote:
>> True dat. It's decided then. We proceed to use Unity as the new name
> Yes, because there are not enough programs named "Unity" on the market!
> We need to fix this deficiency! =D
I think I can only get behind this i
On 02/05/2014 12:39 AM, Sam Duff wrote:
> True dat. It's decided then. We proceed to use Unity as the new name
> and leave it at that. Good job, team! =D
Yes, because there are not enough programs named "Unity" on the market!
We need to fix this deficiency! =D
s/Unity/Unison/g
Kind regards,
Sam Duff
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Sam Duff wrote:
> True dat. It's decided then. We proceed to use Unity as the new name and
> leave it at that. Good job, team! =D
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Sam Duff
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Rob Kudla
> wrote:
>
True dat. It's decided then. We proceed to use Unity as the new name and
leave it at that. Good job, team! =D
Kind regards,
Sam Duff
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Rob Kudla wrote:
> On 02/04/2014 08:55 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > Lean Mean Music Studio :D LOVE IT!!!
>
> I love it too, b
Hence why i said University
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Tres Finocchiaro <
tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (Sorry forgot to CC)
>
> > The advantage here is if you are on a pc like at a university and you
> cannot install an application you run it right off your pen drive.
>
> Although
On 3 February 2014 23:16, David Gerard wrote:
> I'm trying the Windows 32-bit binary under Wine on Xubuntu 13.10. So far:
> * The file selector doesn't work, which could be Wine not quite
> understanding what Qt is doing. I'll file a bug with Wine shortly.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id
(Sorry forgot to CC)
> The advantage here is if you are on a pc like at a university and you
cannot install an application you run it right off your pen drive.
Although it is highly popular in this regard, we aren't trying to encourage
breaking institute or company policy to make music.
Instead,
The advantage here is if you are on a pc like at a university and you
cannot install an application you run it right off your pen drive.
But the ideas of a distro respin i like, But if I do take up the idea we
would include other audio apps as well. I also think LMMS would need to be
RT safe befor
On 02/04/2014 11:27 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> @Vesa,
>
> Some additional feedback, the new LB302 icon with the drop-shadow seem
> to be cut off a bit on the top and bottom.
>
> Minor detail, but thought might be worth noting.
Yep, thanks for noticing. Will put this on my todo list.
-
On 02/04/2014 11:24 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
> You mean for Windows phone I guess? Like a Windows app...
>
> You go ahead and do it! Most people don't have windows on their phone or
> tablet...
No, a "portable app" means a self-contained application, one that
doesn't need installing and can be
@Stian,
No, Windows desktop only.
"Portable" in the terms that it will run from removable media without
installation.
-Tres
- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
> You mean for Windows phone I guess? Like a Windows app...
>
> You go ahead and d
Portable apps are open source apps that can be carried around on a pen
drive to run on a windows pc.
portableapps.com
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
> You mean for Windows phone I guess? Like a Windows app...
>
> You go ahead and do it! Most people don't have windows o
You mean for Windows phone I guess? Like a Windows app...
You go ahead and do it! Most people don't have windows on their phone or
tablet...
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Portable-LMMS-tp6005p6009.html
Sent from the lmms-devel mailing
Will take a look at this tomorrow.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Tres Finocchiaro <
tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://portableapps.com/manuals/PortableApps.comLauncher/topics/qt.html#qt
>
> - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Jonathan Aquilina
> wrote
It's not a terrible idea, as one could carry it with their music library
around.
Do you know anyone at PortableApps.com that does packaging?
-Tres
- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> What do you guys think of a portable LMMS version for wind
http://portableapps.com/manuals/PortableApps.comLauncher/topics/qt.html#qt
- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> No i do not but I think it woudl have to be one of us that maintains it. I
> am willing to give it a shot.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014
No i do not but I think it woudl have to be one of us that maintains it. I
am willing to give it a shot.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Tres Finocchiaro <
tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's not a terrible idea, as one could carry it with their music library
> around.
>
> Do you know any
What do you guys think of a portable LMMS version for windows?
--
Jonathan Aquilina
--
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the W
>
> Thus I think it's best to just let the user choose which ones to export
Or arguably, let the user choose which ones NOT to export. Either way,
it's a fantastic feature!
--
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Appl
On 02/04/2014 09:17 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
>
> What if the check was another light on each mixer channel
>
>
> Ideally, the software should be able to check if the FX channel is
> assigned to any instruments and only list those but I'm not coding it,
> so I'll take it in any form. :)
Well
On 02/04/2014 09:15 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> Sorry, this mockup never made it through (the quoted text put it over
> the size limit).
>
> @Vesa, how hard would it be to keep the stock knobs on this screen?
> I'm starting to like the way they look.
Not hard at all. All it requires is to chang
>
> What if the check was another light on each mixer channel
Ideally, the software should be able to check if the FX channel is assigned
to any instruments and only list those but I'm not coding it, so I'll take
it in any form. :)
-Tres
- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:1
>
> That's because it wouldn't be based on tracks at all.
>
I'm pretty sure that's what he meant, FX channels, not tracks.
Either way, it's a great feature. In my case it's rare to export the
tracks because it's only done a few times towards the mastering phases of a
track, so I can live with to
What if the check was another light on each mixer channel. It would default
to off, but the person just turns it on for rendering that channel? Could
we add shift click to and from point to do multi enable/disable?
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Vesa wrote:
> On 02/04/2014 04:30 PM, Tobiasz Ka
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> I have to agree with billy for something that needs a small icon or image
> we
> need to come up with an alternative. From what I have seen in terms of the
> mock ups here. Some of the notes in some respects look really crappy. I
> hate
>
On 02/04/2014 05:32 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> I have to agree with billy for something that needs a small icon or image we
> need to come up with an alternative. From what I have seen in terms of the
> mock ups here. Some of the notes in some respects look really crappy. I hate
> to say it.
On 02/04/2014 04:30 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote:
>
> However the current mockup seems to me like exporting 14 tracks would
> require a lot of time spent on manually adding export outputs and
> configuring them.
> Maybe there should be by default an output for every track and just
> checkboxes and "enab
On 02/04/2014 04:03 PM, Bill Y. wrote:
> What is wrong with Organic? I love that fact it's got a little Organic
> Carrot at the top. It's among the best looking already. Also I
> disagree with the idea that each one should look unique. The only time
> I've seen that in other DAW's is when it comes
Hey guys I am looking at localization, and I would like feed back.
What do you guys think of the current localization methods?
Regards
--
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cl
On 02/04/2014 08:55 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Lean Mean Music Studio :D LOVE IT!!!
I love it too, but I think it would actually be more applicable to more
limited projects such as Qtractor that rely on external programs for
everything from audio routing to sound generation. LMMS takes 10-12 s
I have to agree with billy for something that needs a small icon or image we
need to come up with an alternative. From what I have seen in terms of the
mock ups here. Some of the notes in some respects look really crappy. I hate
to say it.
For those notes that we are struggling to find an icon
I can understand recoloring them, and reducing the shading to match the
theme, but why are we shaping them into something unrecognizable as score
notes?
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Vesa wrote:
> On 02/04/2014 03:17 PM, Bill Y. wrote:
> > In response to the original post, I just want to ask
>
> Maybe there should be by default an output for every track
>
Agreed.
-Tres
--
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepa
What is wrong with Organic? I love that fact it's got a little Organic
Carrot at the top. It's among the best looking already. Also I disagree
with the idea that each one should look unique. The only time I've seen
that in other DAW's is when it comes to the VST's because those come from
outside, a
Lean Mean Music Studio :D LOVE IT!!!
On Monday, February 03, 2014 07:52:24 PM giakk...@hotmail.it wrote:
> +1
> Seems the best descriptive name with LMMS acronym...
>
> Il 03/02/2014 19:37, Vesa ha scritto:
> > On 02/03/2014 08:24 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> >> How about
> >>
> >> Lean Mean M
On 02/04/2014 03:17 PM, Bill Y. wrote:
> In response to the original post, I just want to ask what is the
> purpose and goal of changing the notes? Are the current ones broken or
> bad in some way?
Making them fit in better with the new theme and style of the program.
@Bill,
Thanks for your feedback.
Generally I feel the same way. I use Ableton as a comparison (again), but
they have the equivalent of an AudioFileProcessor called "Simpler" and it
integrates well into the Black/Gray Ableton theme. So well that it almost
disappears into the software.
The diffe
On 02/04/2014 03:02 PM, Bill Y. wrote:
> I've been a bit hesitant to offer artistic feedback, because I'm new
> to the project, but in my opinion fix things if they are broken or
> could use improvement. If we look at the old plugins Audiofile
> processor is thematically linked to Organica, Vestige
In response to the original post, I just want to ask what is the purpose
and goal of changing the notes? Are the current ones broken or bad in some
way?
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:49 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 4 February 2014 11:49, Jonathan Aquilina
> wrote:
>
> > David would you mind adding
I've been a bit hesitant to offer artistic feedback, because I'm new to the
project, but in my opinion fix things if they are broken or could use
improvement. If we look at the old plugins Audiofile processor is
thematically linked to Organica, Vestige, Kicker, Patman and the old Triple
oscillator.
On 02/04/2014 02:44 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
>
> That is not a bad idea at all. But why add another dependency to the mix.
>
Because it's better than writing basically the same thing from scratch?
It could be an optional dependency in any case.
On 4 February 2014 11:49, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> David would you mind adding this to the tracker please.
Just added as https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/258 - "Add MIDI
export". I didn't detail lots of use cases, just a feature request :-)
- d.
-
That is not a bad idea at all. But why add another dependency to the mix.
On 4 Feb 2014 13:25, "Eric Maes" <20feetp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 11:40 +, David Gerard wrote:
>
>
> On 4 February 2014 11:35, Vesa wrote:
> > I think it'd be a pretty hard and complex project. Mus
On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 11:40 +, David Gerard wrote:
> On 4 February 2014 11:35, Vesa wrote:
>
> > I think it'd be a pretty hard and complex project. Music scores are
> > extremely complex, and not in fact all that well suited for the
> > workflows of digital composing. Personally I think scor
On 02/04/2014 01:50 PM, Bill Y. wrote:
> So, are there any more graphics to work on? How about alternate skins?
Everyone can always work on alternate themes! I have one myself which I
mean to update after 1.0.0 is released.
They're probably not things that will get included in LMMS though,
they'r
So, are there any more graphics to work on? How about alternate skins?
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Vesa wrote:
> On 02/02/2014 11:20 PM, Bill Y. wrote:
>
> I can try, I'm new to Git. Is there a specific one I should fork from?
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Tobias Doerffel > wro
David would you mind adding this to the tracker please.
On Tuesday, February 04, 2014 11:40:31 AM David Gerard wrote:
> On 4 February 2014 11:35, Vesa wrote:
> > I think it'd be a pretty hard and complex project. Music scores are
> > extremely complex, and not in fact all that well suited for the
Dont get me wrong about the music scores I agree totally,
If we want to make LMMS top notch we need to add features taht even those who
dont read music would expect to find
On Tuesday, February 04, 2014 01:35:46 PM Vesa wrote:
> On 02/04/2014 01:10 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > I dont think
On 4 February 2014 11:35, Vesa wrote:
> I think it'd be a pretty hard and complex project. Music scores are
> extremely complex, and not in fact all that well suited for the
> workflows of digital composing. Personally I think scores in music
> software only benefit people who are used to reading
On 02/04/2014 01:10 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> I dont think we need triplet notes. Technically they are 3 8th notes combined
> and a number 3 put either on top or below them.
That's how they're denoted usually, in classical score notation. But
that doesn't mean we have to denote them the same
I dont think we need triplet notes. Technically they are 3 8th notes combined
and a number 3 put either on top or below them.
TBH if its hard to make the notes i would leave the text triplet with no image
and then all one does is add the 3 to turn the 8th notes into triplets, but
then again I t
I dont even know if I have access. If I do not either Lukas and or Toby would
need to add this to the home page.
On Tuesday, February 04, 2014 12:36:19 PM Vesa wrote:
> On 02/04/2014 12:24 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > Hey guys I want to thank you all for all your hard work on making 1.0.0
> >
On 02/04/2014 12:24 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Hey guys I want to thank you all for all your hard work on making 1.0.0
> possible. It is nice to see an RC finally out in the wild for testing.
>
> Every contribution no matter how small is important.
>
> Also prior to this release we did some ma
I really like the icons for 1/1 to 1/32. The "more irregular" ones from
1/3 to 1/48 however seem counter-intuitive.
What do you think of reusing the icons from 1/2 to 1/32 and simply
putting a centered dot on the left side, in the style of prolonged
notes, as they are notated in actual music sh
Hey guys I want to thank you all for all your hard work on making 1.0.0
possible. It is nice to see an RC finally out in the wild for testing.
Every contribution no matter how small is important.
Also prior to this release we did some major improvements in a way to
infrastructure.
1) git hub r
58 matches
Mail list logo
