Re: [LMMS-devel] Guys, we seriously need to update the home page...

I thought they only provided the version control. I wasnt aware they provide binary hosting. On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Hannu Haahti wrote: > GitHub also provides hosting for binary releases. I think that would make > sense as development has moved over to GitHub. > > > 2014-02-21 0:20 GM

[LMMS-devel] Compiling issue in a Debian based distro. Solved?

I have >Qt4.4 on my system. I compiled in tree and I got and error that "MiddleButton" was not in "Qt" when the script encountered timeline.cpp. I changed it to "MidButton" and it compiled just fine. -- Flow-based real-time

Re: [LMMS-devel] Comments on time line, highlighting: better use of Project Notes

Yes, I did it. It's #380 Il 25/02/2014 17:50, Tres Finocchiaro ha scritto: @DeRobyJ, Were you able to file an enhancement request for this? -Tres - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:32 AM, Jonathan Aquilina mailto:eagles051...@gmail.

Re: [LMMS-devel] Guys, we seriously need to update the home page...

GitHub also provides hosting for binary releases. I think that would make sense as development has moved over to GitHub. 2014-02-21 0:20 GMT+02:00 Tres Finocchiaro : > > I think the biggest issue which was raised in the issue about the false >> positive that was found >> > This issue exists on e

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 0.9.91 (1.0.0-RC2)

The point of my comment was to present real world situations I know of. The reason these people have alternate themes for the different architecture is that some times they go off to do something else where, like say lunch. When they come back they are often times not thinking about what version of

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 0.9.91 (1.0.0-RC2)

On 02/25/2014 07:04 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: It definitely applies to instruments as well. Probably there's just some windows-specific

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 0.9.91 (1.0.0-RC2)

> > It definitely applies to instruments as well. Probably there's just some > windows-specific bug. > Confirmed. File a bug? [image: Inline image 1] Also another observation, the save dialog defaults to MMP if you click the drop-down file type instead of MMPZ. Is there a reason for this? -Tr

Re: [LMMS-devel] Comments on time line, highlighting: better use of Project Notes

@DeRobyJ, Were you able to file an enhancement request for this? -Tres - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:32 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > I think in terms of the automation i think that could be integrated into > that particular channel. the way logic does it is that it

Re: [LMMS-devel] Bitinvader

Sorry to take the bait here, but I have to ask... I have HTML disabled for security reasons, as should everyone. Do you mean privacy? I understand the privacy/tracking issue with embedded images (when they're used shadily as a type of read-receipt), but what exactly are the security concerns of

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 0.9.91 (1.0.0-RC2)

As I wrote before, if LMMS detects that the configured artwork path does not exist, it reverts back to its own default path. All data files always and unconditionally get removed upon uninstallation, also the themes. If not, your installation(s) are messed up and it's nothing we have to deal with.

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 0.9.91 (1.0.0-RC2)

Another reason not to have them share app data for themes is identification purposes. Several people I know purposely add a background image to their 32 bit and 64 bit theme-able apps that say, "32-bit" or, "64-bit". This alows them to instantly know which version of the application they are using

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 0.9.91 (1.0.0-RC2)

I think that implies there is a resource conflict. They are sharing a common resource so one becomes potentially dependent on the others resources. For xample. Lets say I install LMMS 64 bit, then LMMS 32 bit. If they share their theme folders, then the 64 bit version probably just had it's themes

Re: [LMMS-devel] Bitinvader

On 02/23/14 15:54, Vesa wrote: > Yes it was a linked image. Are you perhaps reading via some online > mailing list reader? Yeah, it's called "Mozilla Thunderbird". I have HTML disabled for security reasons, as should everyone. I'm kind of ashamed that Sourceforge passes HTML through intact. > Her

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 0.9.91 (1.0.0-RC2)

Of course you must not mix versions, especially if there are major changes. As said, if you have 0.9.91 32 bit and 64 bit installed in parallel, everything should work well :-) Toby -- Flow-based real-time traffic analyti

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 0.9.91 (1.0.0-RC2)

Wont you have issues with which artwork to use. As I had a 0.4.15 install of lmms on my linux machine and installed 0.9.90 prior to rc1 and i had problems loading the theme On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > Hi, > > resources should not conflict and if you have the same ve

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 0.9.91 (1.0.0-RC2)

Hi, resources should not conflict and if you have the same version installed for both 32 and 64 bit, it shouldn't matter which artwork and data resources path eventually is used. Toby -- Flow-based real-time traffic anal

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 0.9.91 (1.0.0-RC2)

Like creating the reg keys, this is should be achieved by NSIS calls (see https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/blob/stable-0.4/cmake/nsis/FileAssociation.nsh) instead of shell commands. I can take a look at it. Toby -- Flow-base

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 0.9.91 (1.0.0-RC2)

If you like I can put together a tutoria on my blog about it. On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Raine M. Ekman wrote: > Should be in the normal places: > > man lmms > lmms --help > > Don't know how one would find out about this on less Unixish systems, > though. Maybe there's a Youtube tutorial

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 0.9.91 (1.0.0-RC2)

Should be in the normal places: man lmms lmms --help Don't know how one would find out about this on less Unixish systems, though. Maybe there's a Youtube tutorial for it? Citerar Jonathan Aquilina : > Is it documented anywhere? > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Raine M. Ekman wrote: >

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 0.9.91 (1.0.0-RC2)

Is it documented anywhere? On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Raine M. Ekman wrote: > Has worked fine for as long as I can remember. > > Citerar Jonathan Aquilina : > > exactly what I am thinking something like that. Does some functionality >> already exist like that? >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 25, 20

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 0.9.91 (1.0.0-RC2)

Has worked fine for as long as I can remember. Citerar Jonathan Aquilina : > exactly what I am thinking something like that. Does some functionality > already exist like that? > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Raine M. Ekman wrote: > >> Citerar Jonathan Aquilina : >> >> > Tres you got me th

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 0.9.91 (1.0.0-RC2)

exactly what I am thinking something like that. Does some functionality already exist like that? On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Raine M. Ekman wrote: > Citerar Jonathan Aquilina : > > > Tres you got me thinking here. > > > > What is everyones take on the following. > > > > How about having a

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 0.9.91 (1.0.0-RC2)

Citerar Jonathan Aquilina : > Tres you got me thinking here. > > What is everyones take on the following. > > How about having a command line option to export an mmp or what ever the > current supported format is for projects and allow users versed in the > command line to export a song in a hurry