Re: [LMMS-devel] rc1 bugs

2014-02-26 Thread Raine M. Ekman
Citerar Tres Finocchiaro : > Secondly, is the "create new project from template" button in the toolbar > unfinished at this point? It doesn't appear to be functional, at least in > Windows. Last time I looked the button worked fine. You need to have some templates in the right place (a template

Re: [LMMS-devel] rc1 bugs

2014-02-26 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
In terms of the template button, I would recommend we disable it until it can be implemented. I'll file a bug for the sample browser. Here is an enhancement request for the vertical real-estate proposals. https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/387 Thanks for reading/responding! -Tres - tres.fin

Re: [LMMS-devel] rc1 bugs

2014-02-26 Thread Vesa
On 02/27/2014 04:12 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > In fear of sounding "naggy" I'm still waiting to hear some thoughts on > this: > > Would it be reasonable to open a bug on the My Presets/My Samples > browser? > The search feature only works for folders that have been expanded > and

Re: [LMMS-devel] rc1 bugs

2014-02-26 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
In fear of sounding "naggy" I'm still waiting to hear some thoughts on this: > Would it be reasonable to open a bug on the My Presets/My Samples browser? > The search feature only works for folders that have been expanded and is > quite unpredictable (i.e. once expanded and collapsed the search st

Re: [LMMS-devel] MIDI velocity handling

2014-02-26 Thread Nikko Rocksalot
Option 3 sounds best to me as a user, as it seems like it would be the most transparent to me. The idea of mapping everything as 0-127 a LA midi does sound like the best option in the long run, as not doing so from the start seems to be the cause of this issue. On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Vesa

Re: [LMMS-devel] MIDI velocity handling

2014-02-26 Thread Vesa
On 02/27/2014 12:58 AM, Vesa wrote: > I think I'd favour solution #1 - keep the 0-200 scale, map 200 to 127 > for MIDI instruments. Addendum: if we're concerned about backwards compatibility - let's just do it so that old tracks get translated into the new volume scale, so that for MIDI instrument

Re: [LMMS-devel] MIDI velocity handling

2014-02-26 Thread Vesa
On 02/27/2014 12:35 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: >> 2014-02-26 23:06 GMT+01:00 Vesa : >>> Would this mean, that the volumes in existing projects would be mapped >>> with a 0.5 factor, so that a volume of 200% in an old project would be >>> set to 100%? >> With solution 3, nothing would change except

Re: [LMMS-devel] MIDI velocity handling

2014-02-26 Thread Tobias Doerffel
2014-02-26 23:06 GMT+01:00 Vesa : > Would this mean, that the volumes in existing projects would be mapped > with a 0.5 factor, so that a volume of 200% in an old project would be > set to 100%? With solution 3, nothing would change except that you can't change the volume to values > 100% anymore.

Re: [LMMS-devel] MIDI velocity handling

2014-02-26 Thread Vesa
On 02/26/2014 11:36 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > > - remove support for setting a volume > 100% for notes in piano roll > at all. Existing projects would load regularly so compatibility would > be kept. This would be the cleanest solution. > > Any opinions? > Would this mean, that the volumes in e

Re: [LMMS-devel] MIDI velocity handling

2014-02-26 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
For me, note volume is a very minor compatibility issue when migrating a project to the new version, if that helps. It's quick to fix volume via knob or fx channel, so if there were any negative impacts to backwards compatibility, I find volume to be relatively minor of one. The largest impact wo

[LMMS-devel] MIDI velocity handling

2014-02-26 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Hi, I'm about to deal with https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/280 however we have a little problem here. Notes at volume 100% equal MIDI events with maximum velocity (127). For notes above 100% we can't map the volume properly to a MIDI velocity. This leads to problems in two areas: test notes in

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 0.9.91 (1.0.0-RC2)

2014-02-26 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > Like creating the reg keys, this is should be achieved by NSIS calls > (see > https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/blob/stable-0.4/cmake/nsis/FileAssociation.nsh > ) > instead of shell commands. I can take a look at it. > Great. Filed bug #385

Re: [LMMS-devel] TripleOsc Feature Request

2014-02-26 Thread Stian Jørgensrud
My thought is that I don't like the random button in Organic but it is the only button I manage to use in Organic. I must press it a few times though. -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/TripleOsc-Feature-Request-tp6673p6676.html Sent from t

Re: [LMMS-devel] TripleOsc Feature Request

2014-02-26 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
> > A random button in triple osc would likely just generate disharmonic > noise. What if we left out the detuning knobs? -Tres -- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, S

Re: [LMMS-devel] TripleOsc Feature Request

2014-02-26 Thread Vesa
On 02/26/2014 05:41 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > Today someone on KVR asked if a "Random" button could be added to > TripleOsc. > > After using SFXR's RAND and MUTATE buttons, I have to agree, this is a > fantastic feature! > > Would this be worth filing an enhancement for? What is everyone's > th

[LMMS-devel] TripleOsc Feature Request

2014-02-26 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
Today someone on KVR asked if a "Random" button could be added to TripleOsc. After using SFXR's RAND and MUTATE buttons, I have to agree, this is a fantastic feature! Would this be worth filing an enhancement for? What is everyone's thoughts? - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com ---

Re: [LMMS-devel] Guys, we seriously need to update the home page...

2014-02-26 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I can host the new site no problem where I am limited is on hosting binary packages. On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Lukas W. wrote: > Yes they do. It's also easily possible to host a static website on GitHub. > > 2014-02-26 8:51 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Aquilina : > > I thought they only provided t

Re: [LMMS-devel] Guys, we seriously need to update the home page...

2014-02-26 Thread Lukas W.
Yes they do. It's also easily possible to host a static website on GitHub. 2014-02-26 8:51 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Aquilina : > I thought they only provided the version control. I wasnt aware they provide > binary hosting. > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Hannu Haahti wrote: >> >> GitHub also pr

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 0.9.91 (1.0.0-RC2)

2014-02-26 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Thanks for clarifying. I still think we'd better fix any issues which make it neccessary for some people to use two versions. Toby -- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic,

Re: [LMMS-devel] Compiling issue in a Debian based distro. Solved?

2014-02-26 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Hi, according to http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/qt.html#MouseButton-enum "MiddleButton" is an official member of the Qt namespace and according to https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt/source/0315971ee951e9abe7f288564ddf2e81aeed1fd8:src/corelib/global/qnamespace.h#L154 "MidButton" is deprecated and go