Re: [LMMS-devel] Webpage Mock-Up

On 03/03/2014 04:20 AM, Israel wrote: > A simple HTML5/CSS site can accomplish great scalability using > percentages and forego JavaScript. If the site is written well ALL > browsers on ALL devices can view it (I am not sure if XP browsers even > count anymore... but you can still write it to w

Re: [LMMS-devel] Webpage Mock-Up

A simple HTML5/CSS site can accomplish great scalability using percentages and forego JavaScript. If the site is written well ALL browsers on ALL devices can view it (I am not sure if XP browsers even count anymore... but you can still write it to work on IE8 without a huge sacrifice) I think

Re: [LMMS-devel] Webpage Mock-Up

On 03/02/2014 11:59 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote: > A download button is just fine after my opinion. > > I don't see where the guessing comes in Vesa and others. It can easily > differ Linux and Windows from each other, only 64bit vs 32bit is the hard > part. I reckon the button should not say downlo

Re: [LMMS-devel] The winners of Best of LMMS compilation

Yes, that's exactly what it means. On 2 Mar 2014 22:00, "Johannes Lorenz" wrote: > > Winners (ranked by score): > Dumb question :) What does "ranked" mean? Is number 1 the best considered > track? > > > > -- > Flow-based

Re: [LMMS-devel] Webpage Mock-Up

On 03/02/2014 10:04 PM, Rob Kudla wrote: > That said, putting a lot of effort into making life easier for users > of proprietary operating systems, like the suggestion made a few times > on this list to remove "Linux" from the name of LMMS, are very > unwelcome. If most of the developers use Window

Re: [LMMS-devel] Webpage Mock-Up

A download button is just fine after my opinion. I don't see where the guessing comes in Vesa and others. It can easily differ Linux and Windows from each other, only 64bit vs 32bit is the hard part. I reckon the button should not say download if it detects Linux, though, it should say "Open Softw

Re: [LMMS-devel] The winners of Best of LMMS compilation

> Winners (ranked by score): Dumb question :) What does "ranked" mean? Is number 1 the best considered track? -- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet

Re: [LMMS-devel] Webpage Mock-Up

Tres, what I am hesitant about is hiding important functionality behind links. Then again, I have gotten plenty of software from sites that display based on UA strings. Maybe we should just try it and see how the web traffic is affeted, if at all. One thing I have noticed is a lack of updated build

Re: [LMMS-devel] Webpage Mock-Up

On 03/02/2014 02:24 PM, Vesa wrote: [quoting Tres] >> 3 words: User agent spoofing... 3 words: Nobody does that. :) Well, you now have 3 counterexamples for your three words. I do it all the time too, both on my desktop and on my phone, where too many sites still embody this comic: http://www.xk

Re: [LMMS-devel] Webpage Mock-Up

> > So you're suggesting that 99.9% of the users of LINUX Multimedia Studio do > not want a LINUX version of the software? I did not say that. I said if they're clicking the tar.gz then 99.9% have downloaded the wrong package. Tar.gz my work for you, but it is not the direction of the Linux des

Re: [LMMS-devel] The winners of Best of LMMS compilation

Yeeeah! Congratulations everyone :) I never knew so many great artist use LMMS! On 27 Feb 2014 20:39, "I'm Umcaruje" wrote: > Hello everyone, judges had picked the winners for the Best of LMMS > Compilation. Thanks for everyone who participated, and congratulations to > the winners. We are curent

Re: [LMMS-devel] Stems not in sync after export [0.4.14-rc1]

On 1 Mar 2014 12:56, "Raine M. Ekman" wrote: > > Quoting Tobiasz Karon : >> >> I've just exported a 51-track tune onto stems (it took about one and half >> an hour to render), imported it into Ardour, and... it's *useless*. > > > Is that the competition entry you advertised in another thread? Yes,

Re: [LMMS-devel] Stems not in sync after export [0.4.14-rc1]

I have tempo automation from the very beginning. It starts off with something like 400 BPM, and after four bars it changes to about 90. And the bahaviour is not that simple. The tracks don't seem to be shifted using any logic, it seems rather random. On 1 Mar 2014 20:16, "Vesa" wrote: > On 03/01/

Re: [LMMS-devel] Stems not in sync after export [0.4.14-rc1]

On 1 Mar 2014 20:28, "Raine M. Ekman" wrote: > > Quoting Tobiasz Karon : > >> Yes, there was a lot of tempo automation. I used only ZynAddSubFX, no >> samples or other instruments. Yes I used export tracks. >> >> Well, maybe a warning, that the export tracks might not work as expected >> and is be

Re: [LMMS-devel] Webpage Mock-Up

On 03/02/2014 07:10 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > No, let's not do that. The user can easily select which package they > want to download, whereas if we start dumbly guessing the OS and > get it > wrong, it'll be an inconvenience (in worst case, keeping the user from > downloa

Re: [LMMS-devel] Webpage Mock-Up

On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Nikko Rocksalot wrote: > > I use UA spoofing every day. > Perhaps, but I still believe this to be extremely rare among end users. As a "UA spoofer" (unless you're doing it for privacy reasons) you are intentionally creating this problem yourself. Steam does this, M

Re: [LMMS-devel] Webpage Mock-Up

I use UA spoofing every day. I find that not explicitly having the option to download each version immediately visible is weird. It also asks that the user know the bare minimum about their system, which I think is reasonable to expect from someone involved in music production. Another thing I won

Re: [LMMS-devel] Webpage Mock-Up

> > No, let's not do that. The user can easily select which package they > want to download, whereas if we start dumbly guessing the OS and get it > wrong, it'll be an inconvenience (in worst case, keeping the user from > downloading the package they want at all). > > 3 words: User agent spoofing..

Re: [LMMS-devel] Webpage Mock-Up

On 03/02/2014 04:17 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > The most complicated part of this mockup if we were to implement it is > the download button that does client detection (still a trivial > JavaScript task). > > No, let's not do that. The user can easily select which package they want to download

Re: [LMMS-devel] Webpage Mock-Up

On 03/02/2014 08:17 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: On Mar 1, 2014 12:52 AM, "Jonathan Aquilina" > wrote: > > Is this just an updated version of the site? What worries me is the lack of responsive design. Yes, actually its just a gimp-style mockup. Responsive des

Re: [LMMS-devel] Webpage Mock-Up

On Mar 1, 2014 12:52 AM, "Jonathan Aquilina" wrote: > > Is this just an updated version of the site? What worries me is the lack of responsive design. Yes, actually its just a gimp-style mockup. Responsive design is a nice to have but for the scope of 1.0.0 have we considered just a small page u

[LMMS-devel] Sample-exact controllers?

Is this option actually functional currently? I don't see any difference in output with it enabled/disabled. -- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet,