Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS wiki images broken

2014-03-27 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
@toby can you check this out. If need be I can code a new home page from scratch and upload it to the site if need be. Toby feel free to email me off list on how to upload please. On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:42 PM, giakk...@hotmail.it wrote: > Both Avira and MSE found a virus. I have no other ant

Re: [LMMS-devel] stable-0.4-new-fx-mixer merged

2014-03-27 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I think what toby is doing is merging features that are in the old master into the new one for further development. We are still going to use the new master branch obviously. On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Hannu Haahti wrote: > Hi, > > I see that some of the new mixer code from the old unstab

[LMMS-devel] Changes made to get mac osx compiling for 1.0

2014-03-27 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Hey Toby, I am not sure which branch tres is working off of to get the osx build working, but are the changes that were necessary to any code going to be back ported to the master branch from the stable 1.0? -- Jonathan Aquilina ---

Re: [LMMS-devel] Any critical issue left?

2014-03-27 Thread Bill Y.
So when is the official website going to get updated to reflect the news? If someone searches for LMMS the first hit is http://lmms.sourceforge.net/home.php which is still listing 4.15 as the newest. On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Tres Finocchiaro < tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > eagles0

Re: [LMMS-devel] Building LMMS for OSX

2014-03-27 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
So LMMS 1.0.0 is now compiling with clang and a few small code patches as well as the removal of the umaintained SWH plugins and OpulenZ plugin. http://i.imgur.com/zdRmMHU.png ZynAddSubFX still hangs. Here is the console message: RemotePluginClient::shmget: No such file or directory QtXmlWrappe

Re: [LMMS-devel] AFP loop points

2014-03-27 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
OK, Thanks. :) - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Vesa wrote: > On 03/27/2014 05:42 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > @Vesa, > > > > I'll get to the artwork next week. > > > > If you end up ahead of me and already start arranging knobs and > > buttons before the artwor

Re: [LMMS-devel] AFP loop points

2014-03-27 Thread Vesa
On 03/27/2014 05:42 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > @Vesa, > > I'll get to the artwork next week. > > If you end up ahead of me and already start arranging knobs and > buttons before the artwork gets updated, just send me a screenshot. :) > Ok, due to some unexpected difficulties (The note release s

Re: [LMMS-devel] Release notes LMMS 1.0.0

2014-03-27 Thread Vesa
On 03/27/2014 10:54 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > Hi, > > as we're still lacking an official announcement of LMMS 1.0.0 I'd like > to prepare the release notes now. I gathered all major > changes/improvements from the repository and here's what I got so far: > > * Completely redesigned default theme

Re: [LMMS-devel] Building LMMS for OSX

2014-03-27 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
I think I found a fix for Alienwah.cpp, will try it tonight to get past 92%. http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/ejDcD0N4CBnPD0CuPm8i -Tres - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > I am honestly not sure if we have to specify anything at comp

Re: [LMMS-devel] Release notes LMMS 1.0.0

2014-03-27 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
Take these with a grain of salt, but ones I specifically remember: * New *Name, *splash screen and logo * File dialog: Common places added to left pane * Improved project icons: *buntu, Windows * Default to SDL for Audio playback on Windows - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at

[LMMS-devel] Release notes LMMS 1.0.0

2014-03-27 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Hi, as we're still lacking an official announcement of LMMS 1.0.0 I'd like to prepare the release notes now. I gathered all major changes/improvements from the repository and here's what I got so far: * Completely redesigned default theme and UI style * New splash screen and logo * New plugins:

Re: [LMMS-devel] stable-0.4-new-fx-mixer merged

2014-03-27 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Hi, yes the plan is to merge maybe a few more new features and then branch off and stabilize stable-1.1. What has been merged so far: - new FX mixer (supporting flexible number of FX channels and FX sends) - rewritten undo/redo support - resync of ZynAddSubFX with upstream In order to fetch the

[LMMS-devel] stable-0.4-new-fx-mixer merged

2014-03-27 Thread Hannu Haahti
Hi, I see that some of the new mixer code from the old unstable branch has appeared in the new master branch. Curious to know why. If the plan is to develop the next version in the master branch -- is this going to be in 1.1? grejppi --

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS wiki images broken

2014-03-27 Thread giakk...@hotmail.it
Both Avira and MSE found a virus. I have no other antivirus. :( Il 27/03/2014 07:24, Jonathan Aquilina ha scritto: install that as that is like updates to the virus db and spyware db for security essentials. Have you tried scanning with another anti virus as it could be a false positive. O

Re: [LMMS-devel] Do we have too many synths?

2014-03-27 Thread Vesa
On 03/27/2014 02:43 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > > I have put my time to learn ZynAddSubFX and I stopped using any other > synths. It just can do almost anything I need in any situation, and I > never run out of horsepower (layering capabilities). > Something I would need to use 8 TripleOscs for uses

Re: [LMMS-devel] Building LMMS for OSX

2014-03-27 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I am honestly not sure if we have to specify anything at compile time. If you need to ask on irc there is mac and macosx channels on the frenode irc network. On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Tres Finocchiaro < tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > FYI the latest xcode i just checked supports 10.

Re: [LMMS-devel] Building LMMS for OSX

2014-03-27 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
> > FYI the latest xcode i just checked supports 10.8 mountain lion as well XCode does, but do you know if there is a setting we'll need to use during compile time, or are the binaries backwards compatible one major OS version? (major being a relative term here :)

Re: [LMMS-devel] Do we have too many synths?

2014-03-27 Thread Sam Duff
I would *love* an Unfa preset pack!! +1! Kind regards, Sam Duff On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Tres Finocchiaro < tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > >> I have put my time to learn ZynAddSubFX and I stopped using any other >> synth

Re: [LMMS-devel] Building LMMS for OSX

2014-03-27 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
FYI the latest xcode i just checked supports 10.8 mountain lion as well On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Tres Finocchiaro < tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > >> I just want to say it would be cool to have LMMS easily available for MAC

Re: [LMMS-devel] Building LMMS for OSX

2014-03-27 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > I just want to say it would be cool to have LMMS easily available for MAC > as I'm teaching some students and could do more workshops, because the > school that hosts this have OS X workstations for students. > If we get a good build we will

Re: [LMMS-devel] A Boost for Presets

2014-03-27 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
> I don't know if anyone made such a nice Hammond or drums with it. > Proper drum packs are a huge gap right now (it has good drum samples, but no easy way of swapping one drum pack for another). Did you honor the standard drum pack note layout? Please share!

Re: [LMMS-devel] Do we have too many synths?

2014-03-27 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > I have put my time to learn ZynAddSubFX and I stopped using any other > synths. It just can do almost anything I need in any situation, and I never > run out of horsepower (layering capabilities). > Something I would need to use 8 TripleOscs

Re: [LMMS-devel] How about a big, big 1-hour challenge?

2014-03-27 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > There is a new screen capture program for Linux called Simple Screen > Recorder. It's the only one that can capture LMMS work for me without > breaking in the middle. It has an experimental live streaming feature > somewhere, so maybe we cou

Re: [LMMS-devel] New synth

2014-03-27 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
:) I think he's committed to Watsyn at this point... :) -Tres -- ___ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-d

Re: [LMMS-devel] How about a big, big 1-hour challenge?

2014-03-27 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
There is a new screen capture program for Linux called Simple Screen Recorder. It's the only one that can capture LMMS work for me without breaking in the middle. It has an experimental live streaming feature somewhere, so maybe we could make a live show and commentary during the contest. Like a vi

Re: [LMMS-devel] How about a big, big 1-hour challenge?

2014-03-27 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
I think making LMMS help count time and keep track of the competition could be an interesting thing, but also a bit dangerous. On 22 Mar 2014 23:10, "davidnimmersatt" wrote: > Thanks for your feedback! All what I've heard about my Idea seems to be > mostly positive. Reason enough for me to make i

Re: [LMMS-devel] Do we have too many synths?

2014-03-27 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
This is one reason why I switched from Triple to Zyn. Layering. Maybe it could be possible to parent an instrument to another one, so the child is always playing the parents notes (with note offset or note delay possibly)... On 22 Mar 2014 15:40, "I'm Umcaruje" wrote: > As a person that produces

Re: [LMMS-devel] New synth

2014-03-27 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
I got an idea when I read Vesa's words, that "It's all about wavetable and modulation" or something. TableMod? Or just "Deck Wreck"! xD On 22 Mar 2014 09:31, "Jonathan Aquilina" wrote: > > How about calling it the VESA SYNTH :D > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Vesa wrote: >> >> Ok so here

Re: [LMMS-devel] Do we have too many synths?

2014-03-27 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
So there are rumours that there is a sound that Zyn cannot produce? How is that?! ;) On 22 Mar 2014 14:27, "Johannes Lorenz" wrote: > > Here's a challenge: show me anything that can be done with Massive or > > any such monolithic synth that couldn't be achieved with current LMMS > > instruments/e

Re: [LMMS-devel] Do we have too many synths?

2014-03-27 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
I have put my time to learn ZynAddSubFX and I stopped using any other synths. It just can do almost anything I need in any situation, and I never run out of horsepower (layering capabilities). Something I would need to use 8 TripleOscs for uses one sixteenth of Zyn. It's just easier to manage, prog

Re: [LMMS-devel] Building LMMS for OSX

2014-03-27 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
I just want to say it would be cool to have LMMS easily available for MAC as I'm teaching some students and could do more workshops, because the school that hosts this have OS X workstations for students. On 22 Mar 2014 19:53, "Tres Finocchiaro" wrote: > So I'm still stuck on the gong-1424 relate

Re: [LMMS-devel] A Boost for Presets

2014-03-27 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
No GCIA AMPS! Better use "Simple Amplifier", as it seems to be bundeled with LMMS. Anyway, I have some Zyn sounds that are nice. For example I don't know if anyone made such a nice Hammond or drums with it. On 24 Mar 2014 00:17, "Stian Jørgensrud" wrote: > Because it looks nicer and will let the

Re: [LMMS-devel] Building LMMS for OSX

2014-03-27 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
>From the comments suggested, I think it's best to leave OpulenZ commented out on Mac for the time being and file a milestone bug like Jonathan suggested. So skipping OpulenZ I'm at 92%, stuck on Alienwah.cpp: https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/6345473/2533433/822f76f4-b55c-11e3-9dc3-665f

Re: [LMMS-devel] Building LMMS for OSX

2014-03-27 Thread Raine M. Ekman
Citerar Vesa : > On 03/27/2014 05:09 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: >> @Toby, >> >> Thanks kindly. 77%: >> >> I'm guessing this next message suggests the OpulenZ code has some >> compatibility issues with clang as well: >> >> Linking CXX shared module libOPL2.so >> Undefined symbols for arch

Re: [LMMS-devel] Ubuntu package

2014-03-27 Thread David Gerard
On 27 March 2014 07:07, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > What im curious about is the m4a and aac formats are those proprietary as > well do they have licensing issues? They were deliberately constructed so as to be literally made of licensing issues. MPEG LA is a group of companies who all signed up

Re: [LMMS-devel] Building LMMS for OSX

2014-03-27 Thread Raine M. Ekman
Citerar "Raine M. Ekman" : > Citerar Tres Finocchiaro : >> I'm guessing this next message suggests the OpulenZ code has some >> compatibility issues with clang as well: >> >> Linking CXX shared module libOPL2.so >>> Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: >>>"_OPL_CALC_CH", referenced from:

Re: [LMMS-devel] Building LMMS for OSX

2014-03-27 Thread Vesa
On 03/27/2014 05:09 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > @Toby, > > Thanks kindly. 77%: > > I'm guessing this next message suggests the OpulenZ code has some > compatibility issues with clang as well: > > Linking CXX shared module libOPL2.so > Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: >"

Re: [LMMS-devel] Building LMMS for OSX

2014-03-27 Thread Raine M. Ekman
Citerar Tres Finocchiaro : > I'm guessing this next message suggests the OpulenZ code has some > compatibility issues with clang as well: > > Linking CXX shared module libOPL2.so >> Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: >>"_OPL_CALC_CH", referenced from: >> _YM3812UpdateOne in fmop

Re: [LMMS-devel] Ubuntu package

2014-03-27 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
What im curious about is the m4a and aac formats are those proprietary as well do they have licensing issues? On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Tres Finocchiaro < tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Jonathan Aquilina < > eagles051...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> @tr