diiz wrote
> No issue. The 3osc would have its note stacking enabled since it's not
> monophonic. It'd work just the same as with the ENV/LFO tab, which is
> disabled on LB but enabled on 3osc.
Then imo it would be just fine with a grey-out of stacking on the GUI
Just as the vst lfo/env pages, but
On 06/14/2014 07:48 PM, musikbear wrote:
> diiz wrote
>> Another benefit is
>> the same reason why we disable ENV/LFO: non-functional features should
>> be hidden from the user to prevent confusion.
> Precisely, and thats why im for it -But as tres points out - what would the
> behavior be, if for
diiz wrote
> Another benefit is
> the same reason why we disable ENV/LFO: non-functional features should
> be hidden from the user to prevent confusion.
Precisely, and thats why im for it -But as tres points out - what would the
behavior be, if for instance a 3oc is dragged in on top of the LB -
On 14 June 2014 13:55, Vesa wrote:
> On 06/14/2014 03:42 PM, musikbear wrote:
>> Diiz is 100% correct. the LB does not have legato, so one note over another
>> makes no sense. Yes notestacking is a no feature, and could definately be
>> disregarded, as of legato is no option
>> It will help in bu
On 06/14/2014 03:12 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
>
> @Vesa, Are you talking about the chord functions only?
>
The note-stacking in the FUNC tab only.
--
HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solut
On 06/14/2014 03:42 PM, musikbear wrote:
> Diiz is 100% correct. the LB does not have legato, so one note over another
> makes no sense. Yes notestacking is a no feature, and could definately be
> disregarded, as of legato is no option
> It will help in bugfixing?
It would help in bugfixing and de
As long as the pencil tool allows it, I'm fine with disabling the
chord-type buttons if that is what's being suggested.
I'm no fan of a GUI that restricts drawing with a pencil tool. If the
drawing is ineffective it may be a good incentive to put a visual indicator
to the user which notes will/wo
Diiz is 100% correct. the LB does not have legato, so one note over another
makes no sense. Yes notestacking is a no feature, and could definately be
disregarded, as of legato is no option
It will help in bugfixing?
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.
@Vesa, Are you talking about the chord functions only?
--
HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions
Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems
Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simp
On 06/14/2014 02:13 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote:
>
> To me playing multiple notes on solo instruments, can deliver some
> interesting sounds.
>
No it can't. If you play a note on LB302 with note stacking on, it only
plays one note, ie. whichever is the highest in the chord. There's
absolutely no extra
To me playing multiple notes on solo instruments, can deliver some
interesting sounds.
Maybe better have a monophonic switch on by default? Let's not limit
creativity, we never know what this might be used for :)
On 14 Jun 2014 10:28, "Vesa" wrote:
> Suggestion: add another flag to instrument fla
Suggestion: add another flag to instrument flags, "isMonophonic" or
something to that effect. Disable note stacking on monophonic
instruments, because, well, it doesn't really make sense to have it
enabled...
For now we only have LB302 that is monophonic, but who knows if we get
more in the future
12 matches
Mail list logo
