@LukasW:
Thanks for clarifying, I'm away from a proper computer so I couldn't spell
this out today.
Also I'd vote to see if we can perhaps allow LSP to authenticate with phpBB
credentials? :) (if we can make a quick shim to do this). Now would be a
proper time to do this in my opinion if others
> Cheers :-) The answer to my original question is:
>
> -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug
This is already spelled out on the Mac tutorial. (BTW - Please help make it
better if it's wrong)
https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/wiki/Compiling-lmms-(Apple)#debugging-lmms-osx
We should perhaps add this to the Linux t
Getting all sorts of interesting crashes. But it sounds like you're in
the middle of things, so I'll try them again later and file bugs then
:-)
Latest: double-clicking any volume knob. Dragging on the knob alters
the volume, double-clicking to enter a value is an immediate crash.
This is what gdb
Hello,
After having tried all I could for my Italian Localization, it seems
that a lot of texts that have translation aren't translated in the program.
Examples:
Help>About LMMS:
- "Involved" isn't translated without reason
- "Current language not translated (or native English). [etc]" isn't
Sorry, I didn't make it clear enough. GitHub can only do static websites.
No wiki, no LSP, no forum.
2014-07-06 15:12 GMT+02:00 Stian Jørgensrud :
> If Github can do it all, it would be easier to have one account for it all:
> lsp, forums, wiki. Cause that would be doable if everything were host
Cheers :-) The answer to my original question is:
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug
On 6 July 2014 14:21, Vesa wrote:
> Fix merged, try it now.
>
> --
> Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
> Tu
Fix merged, try it now.
--
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into
If Github can do it all, it would be easier to have one account for it all:
lsp, forums, wiki. Cause that would be doable if everything were hosted at
github?
I am often getting errors from the wiki, have any of you discovered this
too?
diiz wrote
> On 07/06/2014 01:28 PM, Lukas W. wrote:
> If w
On 07/06/2014 04:05 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> I was interested in the general question too: how to debug in such a
> way as to give the devs something useful to them. - d.
Backtraces... test and document the error/bug as thoroughly and
possible... etc. Not much else to it...
-
On 6 July 2014 14:04, Vesa wrote:
> On 07/06/2014 04:00 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>> I run LMMS built from current master. Today's LMMS-master is crashing
>> with a segmentation fault whenever I try to play a piece. Is there a
>> cmake option to build a gdb-friendly debug build or similar?
> Right
On 07/06/2014 04:00 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> I run LMMS built from current master. Today's LMMS-master is crashing
> with a segmentation fault whenever I try to play a piece. Is there a
> cmake option to build a gdb-friendly debug build or similar?
>
Right... there's a little bug on master. It's
I run LMMS built from current master. Today's LMMS-master is crashing
with a segmentation fault whenever I try to play a piece. Is there a
cmake option to build a gdb-friendly debug build or similar?
- d.
--
Open source
> Forum can't be hosted on SF.
Of course it can.
2014-07-06 13:12 GMT+02:00 Vesa :
> On 07/06/2014 01:28 PM, Lukas W. wrote:
>
>
> Apart from this, I don't really see a point in moving to tuxfamily. What
> does tuxfamily provide that SF does not? In what way is it worth the effort?
>
>
> Well,
Hi,
I recently updated a few packages in my MinGW PPA. The most notable
change is the deprecation of mingw-x-pthreads in favor of the
winpthreads library which is provided by mingw64-w64 runtime
(mingw-x-runtime packages). This shouldn't be a big deal and at a
first glance possibly affected plugin
Vesa I agree with you there, my question though is wouldnt it be good to
have something like a download archive as well as current stable releases
at tuxfamily as well.
Lets say github is down for one reason or another we would have our
fallback for downloads at tuxfamily. I could even try to find
On 07/06/2014 01:28 PM, Lukas W. wrote:
>
> Apart from this, I don't really see a point in moving to tuxfamily.
> What does tuxfamily provide that SF does not? In what way is it worth
> the effort?
Well, SF is a bit of a dead end. They have become unreliable, I have no
confidence in keeping any of
Thanks will give that a shot :)
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 12:30 PM, I'm Umcaruje
wrote:
> You can change the branch on your fork using: git checkout [branch name],
> e.g. git checkout stable-1.1
>
> Best regards,
> Uroš
>
>
> On 6 July 2014 12:20, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
>
>> Hey guys is it poss
I think there is only one reason to keep tux family. Do we plan on starting
a version archive of previous releases? Reason being they would be good to
have in an archive download repo somewhere to use for regression testing
and comparisons etc.
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Tobias Doerffel
wr
2014-07-06 12:28 GMT+02:00 Lukas W. :
> Apart from this, I don't really see a point in moving to tuxfamily. What
> does tuxfamily provide that SF does not? In what way is it worth the effort?
Full ack. Nothing is wrong with Github. Besides the website stuff we
already host release files at Github
You can change the branch on your fork using: git checkout [branch name],
e.g. git checkout stable-1.1
Best regards,
Uroš
On 6 July 2014 12:20, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Hey guys is it possible to change branch on my fork or rebase my fork on
> the stable 1.1 branch or even master?
>
> --
> J
> Does GitHub's policy allow hot linking?
I can't find anything in their policy stating that they don't. They
explicitly say the feature is meant for hosting binary releases and they
even provide a way to get the download count.
Btw, I mentioned this several times, it is also possible to host a we
Hey guys is it possible to change branch on my fork or rebase my fork on
the stable 1.1 branch or even master?
--
Jonathan Aquilina
--
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes
I just figured out how to add additional users. Who else should I give
access to?
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Jonathan Aquilina
wrote:
> Latest Update:
>
> They quickly replied to me saying there are no space restrictions. They
> only check that the space is being wisely used.
>
> I have a
Latest Update:
They quickly replied to me saying there are no space restrictions. They
only check that the space is being wisely used.
I have also asked if its possible to add additional users to a particular
project and am now awaiting a reply.
This is what I suggest.
Wiki & website: we move t
24 matches
Mail list logo
