On 09/03/2014 12:32 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first profiling results seem to be a bit disappointing
One thing that could be done is to go to MemoryManager.h, edit all the
macros (MM_OPERATORS, MM_ALLOC, MM_FREE) to use regular dynamic
allocations, do a custom build of it, then do a ben
On 09/03/2014 12:32 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first profiling results seem to be a bit disappointing - even though
> they probably do not say much about RT improvements. I rendered
> unfa-spoken with stable-1.1, master and memmgr branches and plotted
> the resulting files using gnuplot:
Reproduced and reopened.
https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/1124
-Tres
- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Tres Finocchiaro <
tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @musikbear,
>
> STOP USING SENDSPACE. DONT USE IT.
>
> This is the garbage that people get when th
@musikbear,
STOP USING SENDSPACE. DONT USE IT.
This is the garbage that people get when they click your links:
http://i.imgur.com/2N79I4n.png
Use google drive, dropbox, paste the mmp to gist.github, make a release
under a github branch, email it to me personally, I dont care, just stop
using ad
addition: the y-axis shows microseconds per mixer period (which
currently is 256 frames per default when rendering from command line)
--
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
Hi,
first profiling results seem to be a bit disappointing - even though
they probably do not say much about RT improvements. I rendered
unfa-spoken with stable-1.1, master and memmgr branches and plotted
the resulting files using gnuplot:
set yrange [0:2000]
plot 'stable-1.1-profile.csv' every :
On 09/02/2014 08:18 PM, musikbear wrote:
> Have so many things that wont run on w8
So install a Linux distro, run your XP in a VM for the software that you
need to run (or in Wine if possible)... or worst case scenario, dual boot.
Or just find a used Win7/Vista from eBay or some such. It's just
f
diiz wrote
> You're still on XP?
Have so many things that wont run on w8 - and its beside the subject - Have
you tried the files on a x32 pc and stressed the test with some other
proggies - some others need to do this
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328
I have thought about that with many shortcuts, if you aren't 100% sure, you
might delete something accidentally or do something accidentally. An icon
popping up on the mouse cursor which illustrates what the key combo does
when hovering over something, or information down in the left corner when
yo
Sure, if it will be useful to have one less click to assign knobs, then why
not? For live play?? There are a lot of key combos to be changed and made
which is far more important, IMO, but the idea of making LMMS more efficient
to use is always welcomed by me!
diiz wrote
> Thought about making ass
YES
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Vesa wrote:
> Thought about making assigning controllers to knobs faster and easier.
> How about this:
>
> Alt-click on knob -> bring up controller connection dialog
>
> Shift-Alt-click on knob that already has controller connected -> bring
> up controller co
Thought about making assigning controllers to knobs faster and easier.
How about this:
Alt-click on knob -> bring up controller connection dialog
Shift-Alt-click on knob that already has controller connected -> bring
up controller control panel and move it to mouse cursor
Shift-alt-click on knob
On 09/02/2014 04:55 PM, musikbear wrote:
> On a new install of 1.0.93 both files plays without fail, with all the
> other programs running. stopped after +15 min. This is a problem. There is
> some weirdness between a running 1.0.990 lmms-instance, and other running
> programs. It is too early to
On a new install of 1.0.93 both files plays without fail, with all the
other programs running. stopped after +15 min. This is a problem. There is
some weirdness between a running 1.0.990 lmms-instance, and other running
programs. It is too early to close the ticket.
again files: https://www.sends
On 09/02/2014 12:22 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> 2014-08-29 13:58 GMT+02:00 Tobias Doerffel :
>> Besides this it's probably harder to measure improved RT capabilities.
>> We could use the timer which is used for the CPU meter already to
>> profile the elapsed time for each mixer period and write th
Reproduced in a completely new file, but i now think i have some clues
The new file played perfect for several minutes. /Then/ it failed.
Shut down lmms, reopen
This time i timed it
3 min 34 secd to fail
I then wanted to record it with timer.
camStudio, and a stopwatch + lmms
It failed after 2 sec
diiz wrote
> can't reproduce, tested on that same branch. LFO seems
> to behave just fine over here...
And that on win x32? - I wonder if tres reproduced? He does not say
anything.
I have tryed the same file again, and it does the same thing (you did use
the one i posted?)
I will try to reproduce
2014-08-29 13:58 GMT+02:00 Tobias Doerffel :
> Besides this it's probably harder to measure improved RT capabilities.
> We could use the timer which is used for the CPU meter already to
> profile the elapsed time for each mixer period and write the results
> into a CSV file. Plotting the different
18 matches
Mail list logo
