On 10/21/2014 02:38 AM, Vesa wrote:
> On 10/21/2014 01:58 AM, Vesa wrote:
>> Maybe others could try to do some tests as well and report their
>> results? The main branches of interest are the current master and the
>> memmgr branch.
> To elaborate, here's instructions.
>
> 1. Build both the current
Argh no, I did not. I do now, thank you!
I wonder how many other LMMS features I've been wanting for years are
already in, but just not very discoverable ...
On 21 October 2014 20:10, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
> OK, now I am seriously wondering if you know that this function exists or
> not. Simpl
... oh... I had no idea. Thanks Stian. We need a pin-it icon!
- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Stian Jørgensrud
wrote:
> OK, now I am seriously wondering if you know that this function exists or
> not. Simply right click on a window hearder and choose stay on top.
>
> > What other licences do you want, exactly, apart from CC0 and maybe all
> rights reserved?
I don't particularly care which licences we offer except that we keep it
simple. I'm hoping to get the opinions of the content authors on this so
we can refine it a bit. But again, this email topic i
OK, now I am seriously wondering if you know that this function exists or
not. Simply right click on a window hearder and choose stay on top.
David Gerard-2 wrote
> Yes, I mean that I want it to stay on top :-) I'm using LMMS on a
> laptop, not a 24" screen.
>
> On 21 October 2014 16:32, Stian J
A text box is a good option to be absolutely sure, then we could simplify the
list so much we wanted. What other licences do you want, exactly, apart from
CC0 and maybe all rights reserved?
Here are the link to the post for my suggestion list again, diizy
https://github.com/LMMS/lmms.io/issues/54
Hmm... well I don't think allowing fill-ins is necessarily forcing tighter
restrictions on the content, although for simplicity's sake, having only a
handful of open licenses could certainly benefit the person looking for
training, inspiration or remixing candidates by simplifying the landscape
for
Yes, I mean that I want it to stay on top :-) I'm using LMMS on a
laptop, not a 24" screen.
On 21 October 2014 16:32, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
> But that is because you closed it. If you mark it to stay up, it stays up,
> and the next time you find it it stays up again until you close it... I
> do
On 10/21/2014 11:38 AM, Vesa wrote:
> Who are we to dictate what licenses users should use?
"We" would be the people paying for hosting. I certainly would not host any
non-freely-licensed projects if I were "we". You want to put restrictions
on your work, pay for your own damn hosting and promotio
>
> > The license should be freely chosen by the user. There should be a
> "custom" or "other" option where the user can manually type any license
> they want to use.
We can add a custom selection option, but with current functionality, the
submitter will have to remember to use the description a
Once we have a decisive list of licence options, we can and will hide the
older irrelevant ones moving forward. I'd also like the default to be CC0
if no one disagrees, but this is more of an enhancement request.
- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Stian Jørgensrud
wr
On 10/21/2014 05:39 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
> OK, roger that.
>
> So, you don't want to hide the options for choosing software licences when
> uploading to the lsp? :p I was considering that as something that could be
> implemented now as well :)
>
> To all people here at the list. On the lsp
But that is because you closed it. If you mark it to stay up, it stays up,
and the next time you find it it stays up again until you close it... I
don't see any other logic that would work here, unless you want to take away
the ability to close it while marked as check up. Or did you just mean that
OK, roger that.
So, you don't want to hide the options for choosing software licences when
uploading to the lsp? :p I was considering that as something that could be
implemented now as well :)
To all people here at the list. On the lsp the licences you can choose from
include software / source
On 21 October 2014 11:50, musikbear wrote:
> I wonder if 'Stay-up' should be /default/ behavior?
> I find myself constantly bringing a controller, preset, FX- and other
> small-forms up, and then next to emediatly 'loosing' them again, when i
> click in song-editor. Because of that, i would like
Filipe wrote:
> Just posting some useful information here.
>
> zita-reverb was recently updated, making the ladspa versions match the
> standalone.
> the official announcement is here:
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2013-August/094259.html
>
>
> regarding the "indefinitely
On 10/21/2014 02:52 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
>
> Hmmm... The 32 vs 64 bit finding I find particularly interesting.
>
Just a guess at this point...
--
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers
@Stiam,
Yes, there is the concept of an admin, but it's enabled via MySQL only at
this point.
--
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls o
I wonder if 'Stay-up' should be /default/ behavior?
I find myself constantly bringing a controller, preset, FX- and other
small-forms up, and then next to emediatly 'loosing' them again, when i
click in song-editor. Because of that, i would like to discuss pro-con of
having the 'small' forms /behav
looks good +1
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Sharing-Platform-Conversion-tp10603p10619.html
Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Com
Have only found minor issues :)
I think I'll ask here, cause I don't know if this can be filed as an
enhancement. The LSP doesn't offer any moderator tools, right, cause then
you would have to code a complete GUI and stuff, Tres?
I was thinking about moderating the screenshot section, and adding a
21 matches
Mail list logo
