Re: [LMMS-devel] About the "paid developer" idea...

- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Vesa wrote: > On 11/17/2014 11:34 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > > Bit of exaggeration there... I'm not really even a programmer, just a >> problem solver. > > > I'm not sure your definition, but in my definition... yes, yes you a

Re: [LMMS-devel] About the "paid developer" idea...

On 11/17/2014 11:34 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > > Bit of exaggeration there... I'm not really even a programmer, > just a problem solver. > > > I'm not sure your definition, but in my definition... yes, yes you are. :) Well, a hobbyist programmer maybe. But I don't have any kind of edu

Re: [LMMS-devel] About the "paid developer" idea...

> > > Bit of exaggeration there... I'm not really even a programmer, just a > problem solver. I'm not sure your definition, but in my definition... yes, yes you are. :) > That's why we really need someone reliable to step up and handle the > gathering of funds and the legal side and all that - h

Re: [LMMS-devel] About the "paid developer" idea...

On 11/17/2014 10:39 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > > In all honest would an influx of funds be a bad thing? > > > This depends who the money is coming to. > > To Vesa's point though... perhaps we skip the middle-man and route the > payment options to Vesa (for at least the duration of this pr

Re: [LMMS-devel] About the "paid developer" idea...

> > > In all honest would an influx of funds be a bad thing? This depends who the money is coming to. To Vesa's point though... perhaps we skip the middle-man and route the payment options to Vesa (for at least the duration of this promotion). He's the one with a vision, clearly defined agenda a

Re: [LMMS-devel] Signals and slots

On 11/17/2014 09:12 PM, David Gerard wrote: > Have we got a dev blog You're reading it :) Another thing comes to mind about signals & slots... and also, about the plan for multithreading changes: The problem with our native instruments, why it's bad for them to be rendered in complete per-note-

Re: [LMMS-devel] Signals and slots

Have we got a dev blog about this sort of thing? Or perhaps a wiki page. On 16 November 2014 09:41, Vesa wrote: > Since one contributor recently asked about signals and slots, I thought > it'd be good to write a bit about them. > > The Qt documentation already explains them pretty extensively, so

Re: [LMMS-devel] something is not ok with rc-7.1

Thanks for testing @musikBear. I'd like SecondFlight to confirm in #1198 . IIRC this is the bug preventing the release. -Tres - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:23 AM, musikbear wrote: > Very good job! - RC8 is significantly bette

Re: [LMMS-devel] something is not ok with rc-7.1

Very good job! - RC8 is significantly better! http://youtu.be/DfTshdrXZ4w Two runs perfectly at the same time, not one hickup! -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/something-is-not-ok-with-rc-7-1-tp10817p10840.html Sent from the lmms-devel

Re: [LMMS-devel] something is not ok with rc-7.1

diiz wrote > You should still be able to test the > performance just fine. Oki, good then -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/something-is-not-ok-with-rc-7-1-tp10817p10839.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [LMMS-devel] Signals and slots

Super explanation! Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Signals-and-slots-tp10827p10838.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --