Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS vs qtractor

2014-01-14 Thread Dan MacDonald
with a click or two. How hard is it to install and then insert a plugin into a DAW? My gran could do that. Is is really so hard for you? qtractor is free and open source software - I'm not selling anything. On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Rob Kudla wrote: > On 01/14/2014 12:13 PM, Dan M

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS vs qtractor

2014-01-14 Thread Dan MacDonald
14 at 5:07 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > Thanks! > However I'll probably be more focused on improving LMMS though ;) > > Is qtractor able to use ZynAddSubFX? > > > 2014/1/14 Dan MacDonald > >> Hi Tobiasz! >> >> qtractor has one of the best PDF manuals of

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS vs qtractor

2014-01-14 Thread Dan MacDonald
to give it another go if they've not tried it recently - thats all! Dan On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Rob Kudla wrote: > On 01/14/2014 05:45 AM, Dan MacDonald wrote: > > seems most people on this list are Linux users so I don't understand why > > they aren'

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS vs qtractor

2014-01-14 Thread Dan MacDonald
n 14, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > I've tried qtractor once years ago, but I couldn't easily figure out what > does what - LMMS was much more intuitive and easy to learn for me (as a > former Fruity Loops user). > > > 2014/1/14 Dan MacDonald > >&g

[LMMS-devel] LMMS vs qtractor

2014-01-14 Thread Dan MacDonald
Hi list! First, I want to say that I'm happy to see the renewed interest in LMMS' development, I wish it the best and I look forward to seeing it improve. However, after reading many of the recent posts on this list I get the distinct impression that many people on this list either don't know abou