Re: [LMMS-devel] Sample-exactness ideas

2014-04-06 Thread grejppi
Sounds like what LV2 is doing with its CV ports. This is a good idea. Vesa kirjoitti Sun Apr 06 2014 12:19:47 GMT+0300 (EEST): > Tell me does the following make sense: > > - AutomatableModel contains a pointer to a buffer > - When a controller is connected to a model, it gets passed that buffer >

Re: [LMMS-devel] Idea: optionally use librubberband for pitch scaling in AFP

2014-03-14 Thread grejppi
Vesa kirjoitti Fri Mar 14 2014 16:39:34 GMT+0200 (EET): >On 03/14/2014 04:02 PM, Hannu Haahti wrote: >> >> Good idea, but Rubber Band is a very complex piece of software. >> Running an instance for each voice uses lots of CPU; the results could >> be cached, but that would use lots of memory too.

Re: [LMMS-devel] Effects with multiple inputs/outputs

2014-01-12 Thread grejppi
diiz wrote > Also, they should have the option to send to / return from external > sources/sinks via Jack. That alone would make LMMS 200% more powerful... I just wrote a LADSPA plugin that does this a couple of days ago. https://github.com/grejppi/hijacker It has the side effect of inc