Re: [LMMS-devel] Feeling a little testy

2014-04-28 Thread Raine M. Ekman
Not much yet. I've barely had time to keep up with reading my inbox lately. Quoting "Lukas W." : > @Raine > May I ask what has become of your efforts? It really would be great if > we had at least a few tests. :-) > > 2014-04-12 11:44 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Aquilina : >> I think if there are people w

Re: [LMMS-devel] Feeling a little testy

2014-04-25 Thread Lukas W.
@Raine May I ask what has become of your efforts? It really would be great if we had at least a few tests. :-) 2014-04-12 11:44 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Aquilina : > I think if there are people willing to implement tests for it, it would > greatly help improve overall code quality even further and hopef

Re: [LMMS-devel] Feeling a little testy

2014-04-12 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I think if there are people willing to implement tests for it, it would greatly help improve overall code quality even further and hopefully help to reduce the number of bugs and regressions with each new release On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 11:16 AM, David Gerard wrote: > On 12 April 2014 06:55, Jo

Re: [LMMS-devel] Feeling a little testy

2014-04-12 Thread David Gerard
On 12 April 2014 06:55, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > As there are no unit tests and no mechanism for them. I noticed through some > emails on libreoffice they are using > http://cppunit.sourceforge.net/doc/lastest/cppunit_cookbook.html > Stian if you are in the mood for writing unit tests All the b

Re: [LMMS-devel] Feeling a little testy

2014-04-11 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
As there are no unit tests and no mechanism for them. I noticed through some emails on libreoffice they are using http://cppunit.sourceforge.net/doc/lastest/cppunit_cookbook.html Stian if you are in the mood for writing unit tests All the better, all travis does is integration tests to ensure the

Re: [LMMS-devel] Feeling a little testy

2014-04-11 Thread Vesa
On 04/12/2014 02:47 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > > On Apr 11, 2014 4:47 PM, "Stian Jørgensrud" > wrote: > > > > Command rendering sure is useful at times! Other than that, I can't > say I > > understood much of your message, but keep going! > > My humble translation:

Re: [LMMS-devel] Feeling a little testy

2014-04-11 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
On Apr 11, 2014 4:47 PM, "Stian Jørgensrud" wrote: > > Command rendering sure is useful at times! Other than that, I can't say I > understood much of your message, but keep going! My humble translation: Its about effective testing, which can be done by human or by an automated test. Auto-testin

Re: [LMMS-devel] Feeling a little testy

2014-04-11 Thread Stian Jørgensrud
Command rendering sure is useful at times! Other than that, I can't say I understood much of your message, but keep going! -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Feeling-a-little-testy-tp7798p7850.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list arch

[LMMS-devel] Feeling a little testy

2014-04-09 Thread Raine M. Ekman
Or IOW: I've had it with these melon-farming bugs on this Monday-to-Friday project! Command line rendering broke for the second time this year. Apparently almost no-one uses it, but OTOH it's the one thing in LMMS you actually can test without almost any effort (stay tuned for a 1-minute t