It's a bit confusing to me too. As implemented in the UI, there is only
one mixer, an FX mixer, and it seems it's only use is a way to group
effects that can be applied to multiple instruments. This is the way I use
it.
To treat it like a real (virtual) mixer, similar to what is in Ardour,
might
Quoting Devin Venable :
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Raine M. Ekman wrote:
>
>> Quoting Devin Venable :
>> > So for dumping, I was thinking about an "export all instruments"
>> features,
>> > that just loops through the available instruments,
>>
>> My feeling, speaking from a user point of
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Raine M. Ekman wrote:
> Quoting Devin Venable :
> > So for dumping, I was thinking about an "export all instruments"
> features,
> > that just loops through the available instruments,
>
> My feeling, speaking from a user point of view, is that this should be
> ba
Quoting Devin Venable :
> So for dumping, I was thinking about an "export all instruments" features,
> that just loops through the available instruments, "muting" all, unmuting
> one at a time and calling the export functions, naming the dumped track
> based on instrument name.
My feeling, speakin
I've just started looking over the code. I love LMMS, but wish I could
easily dump tracks into Ardour, or have some reliable sync with Ardour.
Jack sync (master or slave) would be great for syncing with an external
sequencer when you need something more powerful than what is built in.
So for dum
