Another question:
Can we remove the block about 64-bit Ubuntu:
>
> Note for Ubuntu users: You may run into problems compiling LMMS on Ubuntu
> 12.04 or above, as the ia32-libs package has been removed from the
> repositories. See this page for more information [...]
Since we already have the pro
Thanks for confirmation. Updated wiki to reflect.
-Tres
- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Raine M. Ekman wrote:
> This on master branch, not quite up to date, but I assume nothing has
> happened in this area in the last few days...
>
> Removed the libxinerama-dev
This on master branch, not quite up to date, but I assume nothing has
happened in this area in the last few days...
Removed the libxinerama-dev package on Ubuntu and tried to build.
Cmake doesn't complain about anything, but make goes like this:
Linking CXX executable RemoteZynAddSubFx
/usr/bin
The reason this was asked is that the ebuild (used to compile from source
on gentoo) had it for 0.4.15. If you like i can confirm again if its
still in there or they have been removed.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Tres Finocchiaro <
tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) First issue is
>
> 1) First issue is there is a dependency with xinerama is that still needed
> or can it safely be removed.
>
I'd like to know about this too since the Wiki doesn't reference xinerama
it and Ubuntu 12.04 seems to require libxinerama and libxft in order to
build. Should we put a note on the wiki
Thanks, Will resume on this tomorrow morning. How accurate is the list of
dependencies on the wiki?
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> I think so, just try whether the build succeeds without.
>
--
Jonathan Aquilina
I think so, just try whether the build succeeds without.
--
Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform
Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software
Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extens
Is xinerama safe to remove?
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Tobias Doerffel
wrote:
> 2014-04-23 9:00 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Aquilina :
> > 1) First issue is there is a dependency with xinerama is that still
> needed
> > or can it safely be removed.
>
> I think this has been used by FLTK only which
2014-04-23 9:00 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Aquilina :
> 1) First issue is there is a dependency with xinerama is that still needed
> or can it safely be removed.
I think this has been used by FLTK only which we don't bundle anymore.
> 2) gentoo has a policy if something like zynsubaddfx is available thr
>From the conversations I've seen between devs, Zyn needs to be our version.
The newer version has changed it API significantly and requires the
addition of a backwards-compatible wrapper to function with old and new.
Since plugins are contained in their own plugins directory, I would assume
you
Citerar Jonathan Aquilina :
> 2) gentoo has a policy if something like zynsubaddfx is available through a
> system install it is preferred over having it bundled with lmms. In our
> version of zynsubaddfx are we using something that is modified and patched
> to suite the needs of LMMS?
The 2.4.0 o
Sorry for another email. I am working through some bugs on the gentoo
bugzilla to get 1.0 ready for inclusion in the tree.
In regards to sid. Is it safe to use the system version that gentoo has
over the bundled version. It seems like it is the practice with gentoo to
use alot of system versions o
Also what version of zynsubaddfx are we using.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I have taken up a role of lmms comaintainer on gentoo, and I am currently
> working with someone to get lmms 1.0 into the portage tree.
>
> There are some questions that have
Hey guys,
I have taken up a role of lmms comaintainer on gentoo, and I am currently
working with someone to get lmms 1.0 into the portage tree.
There are some questions that have come up.
1) First issue is there is a dependency with xinerama is that still needed
or can it safely be removed.
2)
14 matches
Mail list logo
