Re: [LMMS-devel] Redesigning the way export works

2014-02-05 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Hi, I like the idea of exporting FX channels individually which also should be considerably faster than the multi-track export feature. We would have to render the song only once and grab output data from the individual FX channels and write them out into a file. Shouldn't be too hard to implement

Re: [LMMS-devel] Redesigning the way export works

2014-02-05 Thread Vesa
On 02/05/2014 12:46 PM, Raine M. Ekman wrote: > Quoting Vesa : >> And since the new FX mixer also allows daisy-chaining FX channels >> together, ie. sending a channel to one or more other channels, some of >> the channels will be likely to be used as "intermediate" channels not >> meant for export.

Re: [LMMS-devel] Redesigning the way export works

2014-02-05 Thread Raine M. Ekman
Quoting Vesa : > And since the new FX mixer also allows daisy-chaining FX channels > together, ie. sending a channel to one or more other channels, some of > the channels will be likely to be used as "intermediate" channels not > meant for export. Thus I think it's best to just let the user choose

Re: [LMMS-devel] Redesigning the way export works

2014-02-04 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
> > Thus I think it's best to just let the user choose which ones to export Or arguably, let the user choose which ones NOT to export. Either way, it's a fantastic feature! -- Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Appl

Re: [LMMS-devel] Redesigning the way export works

2014-02-04 Thread Vesa
On 02/04/2014 09:17 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > What if the check was another light on each mixer channel > > > Ideally, the software should be able to check if the FX channel is > assigned to any instruments and only list those but I'm not coding it, > so I'll take it in any form. :) Well

Re: [LMMS-devel] Redesigning the way export works

2014-02-04 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
> > What if the check was another light on each mixer channel Ideally, the software should be able to check if the FX channel is assigned to any instruments and only list those but I'm not coding it, so I'll take it in any form. :) -Tres - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:1

Re: [LMMS-devel] Redesigning the way export works

2014-02-04 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
> > That's because it wouldn't be based on tracks at all. > I'm pretty sure that's what he meant, FX channels, not tracks. Either way, it's a great feature. In my case it's rare to export the tracks because it's only done a few times towards the mastering phases of a track, so I can live with to

Re: [LMMS-devel] Redesigning the way export works

2014-02-04 Thread Bill Y.
What if the check was another light on each mixer channel. It would default to off, but the person just turns it on for rendering that channel? Could we add shift click to and from point to do multi enable/disable? On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Vesa wrote: > On 02/04/2014 04:30 PM, Tobiasz Ka

Re: [LMMS-devel] Redesigning the way export works

2014-02-04 Thread Vesa
On 02/04/2014 04:30 PM, Tobiasz KaroĊ„ wrote: > > However the current mockup seems to me like exporting 14 tracks would > require a lot of time spent on manually adding export outputs and > configuring them. > Maybe there should be by default an output for every track and just > checkboxes and "enab

Re: [LMMS-devel] Redesigning the way export works

2014-02-04 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
> > Maybe there should be by default an output for every track > Agreed. -Tres -- Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepa