Whether it is the culprit or not, no other DAW has this visibility issue on
that screen, so I felt it appropriate to mention, not unlike mastering a
song and then playing on a car stereo, fine tuning often requires utilizing
various qualities and common appliances.
-Tres
--
On 02/22/2014 07:17 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> @Vesa,
>
> Yes this helps. Let me show you:
>
> Lenovo Laptop: http://i.imgur.com/PUkyRBB.jpg
>
> LG Television: http://imgur.com/qt6zS8U
>
> See how the TV doesn't look right? If others don't have this problem,
> the I can attribute it to my T
@Vesa,
Yes this helps. Let me show you:
Lenovo Laptop: http://i.imgur.com/PUkyRBB.jpg
LG Television: http://imgur.com/qt6zS8U
See how the TV doesn't look right? If others don't have this problem, the
I can attribute it to my T (which I use for most of my music creation)
-Tres
- tres.fino
On 02/22/2014 02:45 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> Looks great. The 4 dark and 4 light bars I still believe are way too
> close in color to eachother. Looking at them on a different display
> now and they are virtually indistinguishable from eathother.
Tres can you tell me if it looks better in t
21.02.2014 23:55, Vesa ?:
I'm making the song editor look a bit more modern and fit better with
the new style.
Any criticism / complaints? Now's the time to say if there's anything
that looks unclear or bad about this... if not, I'll send this with my
next commits.
Btw that bbtrack colo
Looks great. The 4 dark and 4 light bars I still believe are way too close
in color to eachother. Looking at them on a different display now and they
are virtually indistinguishable from eathother. Some DAWs tackle this by
drawing a thicker line every 4 bars.
Again, something off topic, but is
On 02/22/2014 01:51 AM, Emilio Coppola wrote:
> What about adding some border-radius to the elements on the song
> editor? The sharp cornes don't fit so well the overall design.
>
I've thought about that, but I'm not sure if I want to do it, because
that would require some quite substantial chang
What about adding some border-radius to the elements on the song editor?
The sharp cornes don't fit so well the overall design.
2014-02-22 0:47 GMT+01:00 Israel :
> I think it looks great!
> It looks more like the Ardour interface that way. It also looks like
> quite a few other big name proje
I think it looks great!
It looks more like the Ardour interface that way. It also looks like
quite a few other big name projects as well.
I think a lot of Audio techs like to have the darker background, for the
same reason a lot of coders do... it is easier to stare at for hours on end.
Just li
So, here's continuing my song editor update. I think this is looking
quite nice and fits well with the overall style of the new LMMS.
The background is dark, yes, but in fact so is the background on the
piano roll, and the automation editor, and no one complains about those.
I think most people ar
On 02/22/2014 01:02 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
>
> IMO making piano roll minimum window size smaller is a very important
> patch. Not sure how given the amount of toolbar, and slightly
> off-topic, but this is needed soon IMO.
>
I attempted this, I found that it can't be made much smaller than w
IMO making piano roll minimum window size smaller is a very important
patch. Not sure how given the amount of toolbar, and slightly off-topic,
but this is needed soon IMO.
On Feb 21, 2014 5:57 PM, "Vesa" wrote:
> On 02/22/2014 12:45 AM, Israel wrote:
> > Do the internal 'windows' theme to an ins
On 02/22/2014 12:45 AM, Israel wrote:
> Do the internal 'windows' theme to an installed Qt/KDE theme, or are
> they all internal?
> I'd like to be able to customize this in the future.
> The other thing about the windows, that I as a user want, is the ability
> to move the buttons to the left.
>
Do the internal 'windows' theme to an installed Qt/KDE theme, or are
they all internal?
I'd like to be able to customize this in the future.
The other thing about the windows, that I as a user want, is the ability
to move the buttons to the left.
I know not everyone likes it that way... but it mi
I didn't have any bad feelings with the old background, the B&B colour was
however sometimes a bit strange. The new proposed background is way too dark
after my opinion. It would of course work well in a dark theme :)
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n
On 02/22/2014 12:12 AM, I'm Umcaruje wrote:
> its really too dark.
Too dark for what?
--
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the
I agree with Hannu too, its really too dark.
Best regards,
Uroš
On 21 February 2014 23:06, Hannu Haahti wrote:
> Looks too busy -- too much contrast especially between the background and
> the lines which makes the clips not stand out enough.
>
> Maybe consider a more subtle gradient and light
Looks too busy -- too much contrast especially between the background and
the lines which makes the clips not stand out enough.
Maybe consider a more subtle gradient and lighter greys? Or a similar
colour scheme as in the B&B editor?
2014-02-21 20:34 GMT+02:00 Vesa :
> On 02/21/2014 08:20 PM,
You can't see it, because it has been removed. It has been buggy and hardly
useful with advanced features like controllers, automation etc. We also got
rid of it in order to decrease code complexity, I'm sorry. If you still
need it, feel free to revert 8b84526dc5759077c706dda999a761f722abf602 - it
Wait a second... has track freezing been removed, because I'm not seeing it
when I right click?
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Bill Y. wrote:
> Can we also see a frozen track. I noticed in the more recent color schemes
> that they don't stand out as much as they use to.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 21,
On 02/21/2014 09:07 PM, Bill Y. wrote:
> Can we also see a frozen track. I noticed in the more recent color
> schemes that they don't stand out as much as they use to.
No we can't, not for a while. We disabled that feature for the time being.
--
Can we also see a frozen track. I noticed in the more recent color schemes
that they don't stand out as much as they use to.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Tres Finocchiaro <
tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do you think the contrast (every 4 bar/meaure) is sufficient?
>
> It is very subtl
On 02/21/2014 08:20 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> Do you think the contrast (every 4 bar/meaure) is sufficient?
>
> It is very subtle on the screen I am using right now.
Ok
--
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Appl
Do you think the contrast (every 4 bar/meaure) is sufficient?
It is very subtle on the screen I am using right now.
- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Vesa wrote:
> On 02/21/2014 06:57 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
>
> My only request is a before and after for contr
On 02/21/2014 06:57 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> My only request is a before and after for contrast. I like it.
>
> -
Before:
After:
--
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the
My only request is a before and after for contrast. I like it.
-Tres
- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Vesa wrote:
> I'm making the song editor look a bit more modern and fit better with the
> new style.
>
> Any criticism / complaints? Now's the time to say if t
I'm making the song editor look a bit more modern and fit better with
the new style.
Any criticism / complaints? Now's the time to say if there's anything
that looks unclear or bad about this... if not, I'll send this with my
next commits.
Btw that bbtrack colour is the new default colour, but it
27 matches
Mail list logo
