Yes, that's exactly what it means.
On 2 Mar 2014 22:00, "Johannes Lorenz" wrote:
> > Winners (ranked by score):
> Dumb question :) What does "ranked" mean? Is number 1 the best considered
> track?
>
>
>
> --
> Flow-based
> Winners (ranked by score):
Dumb question :) What does "ranked" mean? Is number 1 the best considered
track?
--
Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool.
Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet
Yeeeah! Congratulations everyone :) I never knew so many great artist use
LMMS!
On 27 Feb 2014 20:39, "I'm Umcaruje" wrote:
> Hello everyone, judges had picked the winners for the Best of LMMS
> Compilation. Thanks for everyone who participated, and congratulations to
> the winners. We are curent
I agree, Also its a great way to show case the power of LMMS. Also this
means though from a developer stand point there is alot of work that we
need to do. From Paul's Unison core and adding new features and bug fixing.
LMMS has great potential to really provide a threat to the commercial DAW
mark
> Hopefully this will be the
> first of many releases
Actually no bad idea. We could do an annual competition ("best of the year"),
where, of course, only tracks since the last competition would be allowed.
One advantage of such competitions is that it might motivate musicians to
write new song
Congrats to all winners and honerable mentions. Hopefully this will be the
first of many releases
On 27 Feb 2014 20:39, "I'm Umcaruje" wrote:
> Hello everyone, judges had picked the winners for the Best of LMMS
> Compilation. Thanks for everyone who participated, and congratulations to
> the winn
Hello everyone, judges had picked the winners for the Best of LMMS
Compilation. Thanks for everyone who participated, and congratulations to
the winners. We are curently gathering the sound files from the winners, so
expect the album on bandcamp very soon. Also when the album becomes
available ther
