Hey guys I was actually making things a bit more complex when it comes to
the working with submodules and getting things into ubuntu.
In a nut shell all you have to do is generate a source package and upload
it and that is it.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Tres Finocchiaro <
tres.finocchi...@
Thats ok I love a good discussion especially as this issue is going to
surface soon seeing as we are now working to 1.1 as this is going ot be a
rather iminant issue.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Tres Finocchiaro <
tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll take a cheat sheet for sure. :)
>
>
I'll take a cheat sheet for sure. :)
I know it seems fairly obvious to follow Ubuntu's instructions but having
the steps you take would guarantee we've done we can to reproduce the same
exact issues. This hopefully leads towards 1. A new set of steps, or 2. An
upstream fix which addresses the spe
On 04/14/2014 06:16 PM, Israel wrote:
> I did grab it from there.
> Why doesn't sf just link there?
Because there's a difference between the head of stable-1.0 branch and a
release.
It's mostly a conceptual thing, but I'll try to explain it...
The stable-1.0 branch is dynamic/changing, it gets b
Vesa my latest email mentions something along these lines.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Vesa wrote:
> On 04/14/2014 05:43 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > not the one on the home page, but on the SF where you can choose what
> > you want to download 32bit win 64bit win and the source
> >
>
@tres I am thinking about some other things that is why i posted this work
around for master branch. this has nothing to do with the 1.0.0 issu in
14.04 I have a work around and I am working with all concerned to get the
issue rectified.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Tres Finocchiaro <
tres.fi
I did grab it from there.
Why doesn't sf just link there?
The critical components fix various crashes. So they are not minor,
they are very important fixes that are crucial.
@Tres you are right about the Zyn issue... I wish someone (including
myself) would have caught this problem. The branc
With this email i am looking towards june with the relase of 1.1
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Tres Finocchiaro <
tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm with Vesa here. If you need a tar.bz2, just grab it from 1.0.0-stable
> on GitHub. That's what it's meant for and it's trivial.
>
> If t
I'm with Vesa here. If you need a tar.bz2, just grab it from 1.0.0-stable
on GitHub. That's what it's meant for and it's trivial.
If this is all part of an automated script that we need to provide a direct
download URL to, then we should upload a new bundle to SF, i.e. 1.0.0.1
assuming the build
On 04/14/2014 05:43 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> not the one on the home page, but on the SF where you can choose what
> you want to download 32bit win 64bit win and the source
>
Well that's the same thing basically... if it's marked as 1.0.0, then it
should have 1.0.0... as it was when it was r
not the one on the home page, but on the SF where you can choose what you
want to download 32bit win 64bit win and the source
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Vesa wrote:
> On 04/14/2014 05:39 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > I know. What I am going to do unless Israel beats me to it is make a
On 04/14/2014 05:39 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> I know. What I am going to do unless Israel beats me to it is make a
> clone and tar.bz2 it up and upload it.
I don't think you should change the file on the homepage. It should
probably stay as it is, as it's meant to be a snapshot of LMMS at the
I know. What I am going to do unless Israel beats me to it is make a clone
and tar.bz2 it up and upload it.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Vesa wrote:
> On 04/14/2014 05:34 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > SF has tar.bz2 uploaded on it
>
> But it's not latest.
>
--
Jonathan Aquilina
-
On 04/14/2014 05:34 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> SF has tar.bz2 uploaded on it
But it's not latest.
--
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases
SF has tar.bz2 uploaded on it
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Vesa wrote:
> On 04/14/2014 05:16 PM, Israel wrote:
>
> I recently rebuilt the package using the source provided on sourceforge.
>
>
> You can get the latest source of stable-1.0 from git:
>
> https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/archive/s
On 04/14/2014 05:16 PM, Israel wrote:
> I recently rebuilt the package using the source provided on sourceforge.
You can get the latest source of stable-1.0 from git:
https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/archive/stable-1.0.zip
It's in zip format, but that shouldn't matter, if you need specifically
a tar
Email me the tarball of the source and I will upload it to SF.
Let me know when you have a built stable package of 1.0 and we can then
take things from there in regards to the SRU request.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Israel wrote:
> I recently rebuilt the package using the source provide
I recently rebuilt the package using the source provided on sourceforge.
Unfortunately this source is unacceptable, as it doesn't reflect the
fixes present in stable. I will have to add in patches and rebuild again.
I think the source package on sourceforge should reflect the actual
stable vers
@all in particular Israel
I have come up with a solution for the master branch and we can continue to
use submodules.
As everyone is aware we are going to run into an issue with the master
branch and importing it into launchpad since we are using submodules.
bzr cant and never will be able to im
19 matches
Mail list logo
