We can say then:
* @retval non-zero packet has errors, implementation can optionally
return a non-zero error code, STRICTLY FOR DEBUGGING PURPOSES
I think that would clarify that you shouldn't use this non-zero value to
anything else than saving it into your logs. But any ideas to make it
Reviewed-by: Robbie King robk...@cisco.com
-Original Message-
From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
alexandru.badici...@linaro.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 2:28 AM
To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH 1/1 v1] examples: odp_ipsec:
On 9 April 2015 at 14:38, Taras Kondratiuk taras.kondrat...@linaro.org wrote:
+ mailing list that I've missed initially in the RFC.
On 04/08/2015 10:25 PM, Rosenboim, Leonid wrote:
Taras,
I actually agree with you that a change in the API is justified
that combines the in and out CoS
+ mailing list that I've missed initially in the RFC.
On 04/08/2015 10:25 PM, Rosenboim, Leonid wrote:
Taras,
I actually agree with you that a change in the API is justified
that combines the in and out CoS values are provided at the time
of PMR creation, instead of using a separate function.
On 08/04/15 18:36, Mike Holmes wrote:
On 8 April 2015 at 13:02, Zoltan Kiss zoltan.k...@linaro.org
mailto:zoltan.k...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
OVS has a major performance issue with pktio at the moment: pktio
always does parsing, but OVS does it for itself as well, and it is
I think we should get this in api-next for inclusion in odp-1.1.0.
It does have to go via api-next as Bill suggests because a doc change does
change how the api is defined, it is just text but an introduced ambiguity
could lead to incompatible implementations.
We want users to be confident that
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1398
Mike Holmes mike.hol...@linaro.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1441
--- Comment #2 from Mike Holmes mike.hol...@linaro.org ---
(In reply to Alexandru Badicioiu from comment #1)
This bug should not be fixed , it is obsoleted by
https://cards.linaro.org/browse/LNG-872.
The CARDS are not publicly visible.
Triage
Hi Maxim,
I am not fully following what this patch does -I appologize for this- but I
am a bit worried about the usage of scripts and other environment specific
usage in the tests.
I am trying to restructure the test/validation tree to enventually get one
single directory per ODP API module and
On 09/04/15 16:11, Bill Fischofer wrote:
I'm not sure what the benefit of the proposed hack would be, since
you're returning an opaque value.
Still, your app can print that number into the log, so if the developer
looks up the particular platform implementation, he can get an idea what
the
On Wednesday 08 April 2015 11:34 PM, Mike Holmes wrote:
when not run as root ./odp_classifier -i eth0
odp_shared_memory.c:265:odp_shm_reserve(): packet_pool:
No huge pages, fall back to normal pages,
check: /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages.
odp_packet_socket.c:438:mmap_pkt_socket():socket(SOCK_RAW):
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1375
--- Comment #1 from Stuart Haslam stuart.has...@linaro.org ---
Yes I agree. ODP_PKTIO_INVALID is just one of many invalid handles that may be
passed and we shouldn't force the implementation to explicitly check for it.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706
Santosh Shukla santosh.shu...@linaro.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Reviewed-by: Robbie King robk...@cisco.com
-Original Message-
From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
alexandru.badici...@linaro.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 2:28 AM
To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH 1/1 v1] examples: odp_ipsec:
14 matches
Mail list logo
