On 29.07.15 17:24, Alexandru Badicioiu wrote:
My understanding is that POLL type queues don't have any scheduling
attributes, since their scheduler is the application itself. Atomic
context is not really an event attribute - it's a queue attribute which
enforces the scheduler to return an
May be we can create an other task for this?. Steve mentioned that this
verbose is kind of urgent for the multi-node LAVA environment. Let me know
your views.
/Krishna
On 29 July 2015 at 16:40, Stuart Haslam stuart.has...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:13:40PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov
Ordering refers to what happens on subsequent enqs of events received from
an ordered queue. An ordered queue is the same as a parallel queue in that
the scheduler will dispatch events form it to multiple threads in
parallel. However, when those threads subsequently enq their events the
order in
Thanks Bill.
All in order now.
On 29.07.15 20:58, Bill Fischofer wrote:
Ordering refers to what happens on subsequent enqs of events received
from an ordered queue. An ordered queue is the same as a parallel queue
in that the scheduler will dispatch events form it to multiple threads
in
Hi,
Maybe we need additional API for initialising the counter to reset it to
zero and also a need for decrementing the counter?
IMO, we need to properly document the use-case of these counter API
functions since these counters are thread-specific what will the different
between using these APIs
This change (having an ordered context per event) brings up (again) the
question of how do we handle the case when a packet coming in from an
ordered queue needs fragmentation before going to next processing stage. As
related to this, how do we insert locally generated packets into an ordered
Could we not have an optional dependency to pcap?
OpenSSL is required for API reasons, but as this is a non standard pktio, it
seems a bit of a shame to force a dependency for this?
Simply having a CONDITIONAL in configure/Makefile.am and adding conditionnaly
the pcap.c file. Plus small ifdef
Should we have
#define CONFIG_TIMER_RESOLUTION
in config.h?
And relay on it's value.
Maxim.
On 07/28/15 18:23, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
Current test supposes that timer counter resolution is very close
to 1ns. But that's not always true. The resoulution can be 8ns for
instance, it's not always
Mike, I'm looking to generated html docs and it looks like it's better
to put that pages under User guide section.
Best regards,
Maxim.
On 07/23/15 21:15, Mike Holmes wrote:
Signed-off-by: Mike Holmes mike.hol...@linaro.org
---
doc/doxygen.cfg | 2 +-
doc/odp.dox | 9 +
2
On 29.07.15 14:34, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
Should we have
#define CONFIG_TIMER_RESOLUTION
in config.h?
And relay on it's value.
Maxim.
Maybe.
In case of CPU freq this is inversely proportional to odp_sys_cpu_hz(),
and can be determined. But in case of using real timer there is no
API to get
On 07/28/15 20:54, Stuart Haslam wrote:
Create a new pktio type that allows for reading from and writing to a
pcap capture file. This is intended to be used as a simple way of
injecting test packets into an application for functional testing and
can be used as it is with some of the existing
- Original Message -
From: Maxim Uvarov maxim.uva...@linaro.org
To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
Sent: Wednesday, 29 July, 2015 11:58:59 AM
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [RFC PATCH] linux-generc: pktio: add pcap pktio type
On 07/29/15 10:03, Nicolas Morey Chaisemartin wrote:
Could we not
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 01:23:20PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
On 07/28/15 20:54, Stuart Haslam wrote:
Create a new pktio type that allows for reading from and writing to a
pcap capture file. This is intended to be used as a simple way of
injecting test packets into an application for
On 07/29/15 14:00, Stuart Haslam wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 01:23:20PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
On 07/28/15 20:54, Stuart Haslam wrote:
Create a new pktio type that allows for reading from and writing to a
pcap capture file. This is intended to be used as a simple way of
injecting test
Applied,
Maxim.
On 07/29/15 00:02, Bill Fischofer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Mike Holmes mike.hol...@linaro.org
mailto:mike.hol...@linaro.org wrote:
Signed-off-by: Mike Holmes mike.hol...@linaro.org
mailto:mike.hol...@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer
Agreed. An ODP implementation should be for a platform, not for a specific
model within a platform family. Another reason why config.h needs to be
converted from #defines to APIs.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Ivan Khoronzhuk ivan.khoronz...@linaro.org
wrote:
On 29.07.15 14:42, Ivan
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:43:29PM -0400, Mike Holmes wrote:
I like it.
Do we need a facility to compare output in some way to ensure correct
operation - even if it is just to test this interface and is not a bigger
part of regression ?
Maybe the test suite checks that pcap-diff [1] (or
corrected alignment issues
Signed-off-by: Balakrishna.Garapati balakrishna.garap...@linaro.org
---
example/generator/odp_generator.c | 13 -
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/example/generator/odp_generator.c
b/example/generator/odp_generator.c
index
On 29 July 2015 at 06:47, Nicolas Morey Chaisemartin nmo...@kalray.eu
wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Maxim Uvarov maxim.uva...@linaro.org
To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
Sent: Wednesday, 29 July, 2015 11:58:59 AM
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [RFC PATCH] linux-generc: pktio: add pcap
On 07/29/15 10:03, Nicolas Morey Chaisemartin wrote:
Could we not have an optional dependency to pcap?
OpenSSL is required for API reasons, but as this is a non standard
pktio, it seems a bit of a shame to force a dependency for this?
Nicolas, just to clarify. I think that libpcap exist
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:58:59PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
On 07/29/15 10:03, Nicolas Morey Chaisemartin wrote:
Could we not have an optional dependency to pcap?
OpenSSL is required for API reasons, but as this is a non standard
pktio, it seems a bit of a shame to force a dependency for
Yes, this is why I wanted to discuss this further since the question of how
you handle fragmentation and reassembly is one of the key grey areas in
the current spec. These are practical use cases of the more general
question of how to you insert and delete events into an existing order
sequence
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:14:06PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
On 07/29/15 14:00, Stuart Haslam wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 01:23:20PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
On 07/28/15 20:54, Stuart Haslam wrote:
Create a new pktio type that allows for reading from and writing to a
pcap capture file.
On 29.07.15 14:42, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
On 29.07.15 14:34, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
Should we have
#define CONFIG_TIMER_RESOLUTION
in config.h?
And relay on it's value.
Maxim.
Maybe.
In case of CPU freq this is inversely proportional to odp_sys_cpu_hz(),
and can be determined. But in case
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 08:56:53PM -0500, Bill Fischofer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer bill.fischo...@linaro.org
---
include/odp/api/config.h | 5 +
.../include/odp/plat/schedule_types.h | 4 +
platform/linux-generic/odp_schedule.c
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:43:42PM +0200, Christophe Milard wrote:
This is another step in getting the test environment more homogeneous.
The usage of this macro guaranties that the test name (string in C_unit)
will always match the function name.
This is needed as the C_unit strings will be
On 29.07.15 14:47, Bill Fischofer wrote:
Agreed. An ODP implementation should be for a platform, not for a
specific model within a platform family. Another reason why config.h
needs to be converted from #defines to APIs.
There is a little more sense under it. Each CPU, theoretically, (no
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 01:12:23PM +0200, Balakrishna.Garapati wrote:
corrected alignment issues
This should go beneath the --- line so that it doesn't end up in the
commit log.
Signed-off-by: Balakrishna.Garapati balakrishna.garap...@linaro.org
---
example/generator/odp_generator.c | 13
On 29 July 2015 at 07:51, Maxim Uvarov maxim.uva...@linaro.org wrote:
Mike, I'm looking to generated html docs and it looks like it's better to
put that pages under User guide section.
There are two levels of information, the basic requirements and a human
walk though.
The contributing and
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1722
Bug ID: 1722
Summary: CID 99100: BUFFER_SIZE_WARNING:
/example/classifier/odp_classifier.c
Product: OpenDataPlane
Version: 1.2
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
On 07/29/15 15:22, Mike Holmes wrote:
On 29 July 2015 at 07:51, Maxim Uvarov maxim.uva...@linaro.org
mailto:maxim.uva...@linaro.org wrote:
Mike, I'm looking to generated html docs and it looks like it's
better to put that pages under User guide section.
There are two levels of
Merged,
Maxim.
On 07/28/15 13:36, Stuart Haslam wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:38:32PM +0200, Christophe Milard wrote:
Since v2: fix spell typo and rebased
Since v1: added the 3 first patches to work around the problem of
using filename errno.h locally and populated errno lib.
Also
On 07/29/15 16:02, Stuart Haslam wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 03:54:51PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
On 07/29/15 15:21, Stuart Haslam wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 01:12:23PM +0200, Balakrishna.Garapati wrote:
corrected alignment issues
This should go beneath the --- line so that it
Thanks for the comments.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Stuart Haslam stuart.has...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 08:56:53PM -0500, Bill Fischofer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer bill.fischo...@linaro.org
---
include/odp/api/config.h | 5 +
On 29 July 2015 at 08:17, Ivan Khoronzhuk ivan.khoronz...@linaro.org
wrote:
On 29.07.15 14:47, Bill Fischofer wrote:
Agreed. An ODP implementation should be for a platform, not for a
specific model within a platform family. Another reason why config.h
needs to be converted from #defines
On 07/29/15 15:21, Stuart Haslam wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 01:12:23PM +0200, Balakrishna.Garapati wrote:
corrected alignment issues
This should go beneath the --- line so that it doesn't end up in the
commit log.
Signed-off-by: Balakrishna.Garapati balakrishna.garap...@linaro.org
---
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 03:54:51PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
On 07/29/15 15:21, Stuart Haslam wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 01:12:23PM +0200, Balakrishna.Garapati wrote:
corrected alignment issues
This should go beneath the --- line so that it doesn't end up in the
commit log.
On 29 July 2015 at 08:52, Maxim Uvarov maxim.uva...@linaro.org wrote:
On 07/29/15 15:22, Mike Holmes wrote:
On 29 July 2015 at 07:51, Maxim Uvarov maxim.uva...@linaro.org mailto:
maxim.uva...@linaro.org wrote:
Mike, I'm looking to generated html docs and it looks like it's
better
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:13:40PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
On 07/29/15 16:43, Stuart Haslam wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 04:10:06PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
On 07/29/15 16:02, Stuart Haslam wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 03:54:51PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
On 07/29/15 15:21, Stuart
Signed-off-by: Balakrishna.Garapati balakrishna.garap...@linaro.org
---
Added fflush
example/generator/odp_generator.c | 14 +-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/example/generator/odp_generator.c
b/example/generator/odp_generator.c
index d6ec758..bdee222
Use number of workers to not deadlock on barrier.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov maxim.uva...@linaro.org
---
test/validation/synchronizers/synchronizers.c | 8 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/validation/synchronizers/synchronizers.c
On 07/29/15 16:43, Stuart Haslam wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 04:10:06PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
On 07/29/15 16:02, Stuart Haslam wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 03:54:51PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
On 07/29/15 15:21, Stuart Haslam wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 01:12:23PM +0200,
On 29 July 2015 at 08:17, Ivan Khoronzhuk ivan.khoronz...@linaro.org
wrote:
On 29.07.15 14:47, Bill Fischofer wrote:
Agreed. An ODP implementation should be for a platform, not for a
specific model within a platform family. Another reason why config.h
needs to be converted from #defines
Mike,
On 29.07.15 15:27, Mike Holmes wrote:
On 29 July 2015 at 08:17, Ivan Khoronzhuk ivan.khoronz...@linaro.org
mailto:ivan.khoronz...@linaro.org wrote:
On 29.07.15 14:47, Bill Fischofer wrote:
Agreed. An ODP implementation should be for a platform, not for a
specific
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 04:10:06PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
On 07/29/15 16:02, Stuart Haslam wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 03:54:51PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
On 07/29/15 15:21, Stuart Haslam wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 01:12:23PM +0200, Balakrishna.Garapati wrote:
corrected alignment
My understanding is that POLL type queues don't have any scheduling
attributes, since their scheduler is the application itself. Atomic context
is not really an event attribute - it's a queue attribute which enforces
the scheduler to return an event from the queue only when no other event
from the
46 matches
Mail list logo
