- FI/Espoo)
> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 10:55 AM
> To: EXT Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] api: atomic: added
> atomic_is_lock_free
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: EXT Nicolas Mo
On 10/27/2015 17:48, Petri Savolainen wrote:
Platforms may support some uint64 operations lock-free and
others not. For example, inc_64 can be natively supported but
cas_64 (or max_64/min_64) not. User may be able to switch to
32 bit variables when a 64 bit operation uses locks. The same
atomic
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> EXT Maxim Uvarov
> Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 11:30 AM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] api: atomic: added
> atomic_is_lock_fr
On 11/05/2015 12:58, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
EXT Maxim Uvarov
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 11:30 AM
To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] api
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] api: atomic: added
atomic_is_lock_free
On 10/27/2015 17:48, Petri Savolainen wrote:
Platforms may support some uint64 operations lock-free and
others not. For example, inc_64 can be natively supported but
cas_64 (or max_64/min_64) not. User may be able to switch
> -Original Message-
> From: EXT Maxim Uvarov [mailto:maxim.uva...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 12:26 PM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo); lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] api: atomic: added
> atomic_is_lo
ay, October 27, 2015 5:35 PM
> >> To: Ivan Khoronzhuk; Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo); lng-
> >> o...@lists.linaro.org
> >> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] api: atomic: added
> >> atomic_is_lock_free
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >&g
> -Original Message-
> From: EXT Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin [mailto:nmo...@kalray.eu]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 10:23 AM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo); Ivan Khoronzhuk; lng-
> o...@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH]
Ivan Khoronzhuk; lng-
>> o...@lists.linaro.org
>> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] api: atomic: added
>> atomic_is_lock_free
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/28/2015 09:12 AM, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>>>>> Nicolas, you could define a platf
> > Nicolas, you could define a platform specific init struct that gives user
> option to tell which u64 operations will be called. If user tells that
> cas/min/max_u64 are not called, you can implement everything lock-free. The
> same is in git log entry:
> >
> > " >> The same
> Everything is
On 10/28/2015 09:12 AM, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>>> Nicolas, you could define a platform specific init struct that gives user
>> option to tell which u64 operations will be called. If user tells that
>> cas/min/max_u64 are not called, you can implement everything lock-free.
> -Original Message-
> From: EXT Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin [mailto:nmo...@kalray.eu]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 10:41 AM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo); lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] api: atomic: added
> a
: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] api: atomic: added
atomic_is_lock_free
On 10/27/2015 04:16 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
On 27.10.15 16:48, Petri Savolainen wrote:
Platforms may support some uint64 operations lock-free and
others not. For example, inc_64 can be natively supported but
cas_64
Platforms may support some uint64 operations lock-free and
others not. For example, inc_64 can be natively supported but
cas_64 (or max_64/min_64) not. User may be able to switch to
32 bit variables when a 64 bit operation uses locks. The same
atomic operation enum could be used for platform init
On 10/27/2015 04:16 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
>
>
> On 27.10.15 16:48, Petri Savolainen wrote:
>> Platforms may support some uint64 operations lock-free and
>> others not. For example, inc_64 can be natively supported but
>> cas_64 (or max_64/min_64) not. User may be able to switch to
>> 32 bit
On 27.10.15 16:48, Petri Savolainen wrote:
Platforms may support some uint64 operations lock-free and
others not. For example, inc_64 can be natively supported but
cas_64 (or max_64/min_64) not. User may be able to switch to
32 bit variables when a 64 bit operation uses locks. The same
atomic
> -Original Message-
> From: EXT Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin [mailto:nmo...@kalray.eu]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 5:35 PM
> To: Ivan Khoronzhuk; Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo); lng-
> o...@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH]
okia - FI/Espoo); lng-
>> o...@lists.linaro.org
>> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] api: atomic: added
>> atomic_is_lock_free
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/27/2015 04:16 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
>>>
>>> On 27.10.15 16:48, Petri Savolainen wrote:
>>>&
18 matches
Mail list logo
