Added validation tests for ODP std C library API.
Signed-off-by: Petri Savolainen
---
configure.ac | 1 +
platform/linux-generic/test/Makefile.am | 1 +
test/validation/Makefile.am | 1 +
test/validation/std_clib/.gitignore | 1 +
test/validatio
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Petri Savolainen <
petri.savolai...@nokia.com> wrote:
> Added validation tests for ODP std C library API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petri Savolainen
>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Bill Fischofer
> ---
> configure.ac | 1 +
> platform/linux-ge
Ping.
From: EXT Bill Fischofer [mailto:bill.fischo...@linaro.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 5:27 PM
To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
Cc: LNG ODP Mailman List
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] validation: std_clib: added validation
tests
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:52 AM
- FI/Espoo)
> *Cc:* LNG ODP Mailman List
> *Subject:* Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] validation: std_clib: added
> validation tests
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Petri Savolainen <
> petri.savolai...@nokia.com> wrote:
>
> Added vali
, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
Cc: EXT Maxim Uvarov; LNG ODP Mailman List
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] validation: std_clib: added validation
tests
This is not a ODP module, is it? should/could it be one?
I am not sure either what is the point of testing libC? If the question is to
make sure
>
>
> *From:* EXT Christophe Milard [mailto:christophe.mil...@linaro.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 05, 2015 12:02 PM
> *To:* Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> *Cc:* EXT Maxim Uvarov; LNG ODP Mailman List
>
> *Subject:* Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] validation: std_clib
XT Christophe Milard [mailto:christophe.mil...@linaro.org]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 05, 2015 12:02 PM
>> *To:* Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
>> *Cc:* EXT Maxim Uvarov; LNG ODP Mailman List
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] validation: std_clib:
Merged,
Maxim.
On 10/29/2015 18:26, Bill Fischofer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Petri Savolainen
mailto:petri.savolai...@nokia.com>> wrote:
Added validation tests for ODP std C library API.
Signed-off-by: Petri Savolainen mailto:petri.savolai...@nokia.com>>
Reviewed-an
12:12 PM
To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
Cc: EXT Maxim Uvarov; LNG ODP Mailman List
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] validation: std_clib: added validation
tests
but why should ODP tests test the C lib, as it is not part of ODP?
If there is a good reason to do so (which I do not
fischo...@linaro.org>]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 5:27 PM
To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
Cc: LNG ODP Mailman List
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] validation: std_clib: added validation
tests
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Petri Savolainen
mailto:petri.savolai...@nokia
ophe Milard [mailto:christophe.mil...@linaro.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 05, 2015 12:12 PM
>
> *To:* Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> *Cc:* EXT Maxim Uvarov; LNG ODP Mailman List
> *Subject:* Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] validation: std_clib: added
> validation tests
>
&g
EXT Christophe Milard [mailto:christophe.mil...@linaro.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 05, 2015 12:15 PM
>
> *To:* Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> *Cc:* EXT Maxim Uvarov; LNG ODP Mailman List
> *Subject:* Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] validation: std_clib: added
> validat
ay, November 05, 2015 12:15 PM
*To:* Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
*Cc:* EXT Maxim Uvarov; LNG ODP Mailman List
*Subject:* Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] validation: std_clib:
added validation tests
Also, this patch does not respect the test naming convention rules.
at 11:16, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <
>> petri.savolai...@nokia.com <mailto:petri.savolai...@nokia.com>> wrote:
>>
>> What rules exactly?
>>
>> *From:*EXT Christophe Milard [mailto:christophe.mil...@linaro.org
>> &
]
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 12:28 PM
To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
Cc: EXT Maxim Uvarov; LNG ODP Mailman List
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] validation: std_clib: added validation
tests
/doc/implementers-guide/implementers-guide.html:
2.1.2. Module test and naming
ailto:christophe.mil...@linaro.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 05, 2015 12:28 PM
>
> *To:* Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> *Cc:* EXT Maxim Uvarov; LNG ODP Mailman List
> *Subject:* Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] validation: std_clib: added
> validation tests
>
>
>
>
etri
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* EXT Christophe Milard [mailto:christophe.mil...@linaro.org]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 05, 2015 12:28 PM
>>
>> *To:* Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
>> *Cc:* EXT Maxim Uvarov; LNG ODP
; LNG ODP Mailman List
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] validation: std_clib: added validation
tests
ok.then it is the right place in the structure. Are you fixing the names, Petri?
On 5 November 2015 at 11:35, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
mailto:petri.savolai...@nokia.com>>
er 05, 2015 12:53 PM
To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
Cc: EXT Maxim Uvarov; LNG ODP Mailman List
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] validation: std_clib: added validation
tests
Also, I am not sure about why we need to wrap the libC functions in ODP, how
much we should do it, and h
t; *To:* Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> *Cc:* EXT Maxim Uvarov; LNG ODP Mailman List
> *Subject:* Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] validation: std_clib: added
> validation tests
>
>
>
> ok.then it is the right place in the structure. Are you fixing the names,
> Petri?
&
nokia.com> wrote:
>
> /**
>
> * @defgroup odp_std_clib ODP STD CLIB
>
> * @details
>
> * ODP version of often used C library calls
>
> * @{
>
> */
>
>
>
> The module name is “std_clib”. I did try to use that as the module name.
> You can find e.g. st
21 matches
Mail list logo
