Hi all,
Maxim, are you saying you prefer a pull request?
Last time I did one, you required the patch to be sent on the list, so
I am not sure what to do next time.
Thx,
Christophe.
On 27 February 2017 at 10:15, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> for big serries of patches >20
for big serries of patches >20 it's good to provide some git link to
download all of that. That Might be Linaro's people git or github.
Maxim.
On 25 February 2017 at 01:03, Mike Holmes wrote:
> I did make a ticket for IT to look into this
>
> On 24 February 2017 at
I did make a ticket for IT to look into this
On 24 February 2017 at 16:55, Bill Fischofer
wrote:
> It looks like Christophe sent the original series to Mike, Forrest,
> Sachin, Yi, Me, and the odp mailing list. I suspect that's why Mike
> and I (and presumably the
It looks like Christophe sent the original series to Mike, Forrest,
Sachin, Yi, Me, and the odp mailing list. I suspect that's why Mike
and I (and presumably the others on the direct mail list) have a
complete copy of the series. A number of the parts didn't make it
either to patchworks or the ODP
Christophe will be back next week and we can check into where they went. I
will ping Philip if I can prove I got them on CC and the list lost them.
On Feb 24, 2017 3:31 AM, "Josep Puigdemont"
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:51:27AM -0600, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:51:27AM -0600, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> I see all the patches in this series on the mailing list, but it appears
> that the patchwork series[1] is missing parts 14 and 16.
and part 20.
I don't have parts 14, 16, and 20 on my inbox either, and it doesn't look
like they
I see all the patches in this series on the mailing list, but it appears
that the patchwork series[1] is missing parts 14 and 16.
---
[1] http://patches.opendataplane.org/project/lng-odp/list/?series=65
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Yi He wrote:
> In patchwork for this
In patchwork for this series I saw 14, 16, 21 are missing, do you see the
same problem?
Best Regards, Yi
On 23 February 2017 at 07:32, Bill Fischofer
wrote:
> This series compiles and runs/tests fine using gcc and clang on both 64
> and 32 bit systems. Many comments,
This series compiles and runs/tests fine using gcc and clang on both 64 and
32 bit systems. Many comments, mostly cosmetic, however some missing field
initializations are noted as well as some suggestions for handling type
conversions.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Christophe Milard <
This patch series implements the driver interface, i.e.
enumerator class, enumerator, devio and drivers registration and probing.
This interface is depicted in:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eCKPJF6uSlOllXi_sKDvRwUD2BXm-ZzxZoKT0nVEsl4/edit
The associated tests are testing these mechanisms.
10 matches
Mail list logo