On 26/01/16 16:17, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
On 26 January 2016 at 14:32, Zoltan Kiss mailto:zoltan.k...@linaro.org>> wrote:
Hi Ola,
Would you mind taking a look at this?
Zoli
On 22/01/16 18:24, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
As per-thread caches might retain some elements, no par
Also the subject line misspells "entirely". As this will show up in the log
of commits, it should be correctly spelled.
A better title would perhaps be "validation:timer: handle early exhaustion
of pool".
On 26 January 2016 at 17:17, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
>
>
> On 26 January 2016 at 14:32, Zoltan
On 26 January 2016 at 14:32, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> Hi Ola,
>
> Would you mind taking a look at this?
>
> Zoli
>
> On 22/01/16 18:24, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
>
>> As per-thread caches might retain some elements, no particular thread
>> should assume that a certain amount of elements are available at any
Hi Ola,
Would you mind taking a look at this?
Zoli
On 22/01/16 18:24, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
As per-thread caches might retain some elements, no particular thread
should assume that a certain amount of elements are available at any
time.
Also, we can't reliable check the high watermark anymore.
S
As per-thread caches might retain some elements, no particular thread
should assume that a certain amount of elements are available at any
time.
Also, we can't reliable check the high watermark anymore.
Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss
---
test/validation/timer/timer.c | 27 +--
