Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCHv4 2/2] doc: update CONTRIBUTING and DEPENDENCIES files for images

On 15 January 2016 at 08:25, Bill Fischofer wrote: > I have no objection to keeping PDF capability, however the question is can > PDFs use .svgs? > No, not for doxygen at least it requires they by rendered as .eps to feed into latex > If yes, then we can still use v4 of the patch. If not the

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCHv4 2/2] doc: update CONTRIBUTING and DEPENDENCIES files for images

I have no objection to keeping PDF capability, however the question is can PDFs use .svgs? If yes, then we can still use v4 of the patch. If not then given that we'd still need the .eps conversions would this patch series have utility at all? On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Maxim Uvarov wrote:

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCHv4 2/2] doc: update CONTRIBUTING and DEPENDENCIES files for images

I might be too late but pdf I think is useful. At least for me. Let's discuss that on meeting. Maxim. On 01/15/2016 03:06, Bill Fischofer wrote: OK v5 sent. Only Delta is removing the PDF stuff in DEPENDENCIES. On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Mike Holmes > wro

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCHv4 2/2] doc: update CONTRIBUTING and DEPENDENCIES files for images

OK v5 sent. Only Delta is removing the PDF stuff in DEPENDENCIES. On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Mike Holmes wrote: > If it is growing in scope I agree to follow ons, let's focus on what we > broke with this change then. > We only ever supported html and pdf before so this should just clean t

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCHv4 2/2] doc: update CONTRIBUTING and DEPENDENCIES files for images

If it is growing in scope I agree to follow ons, let's focus on what we broke with this change then. We only ever supported html and pdf before so this should just clean the remaining pdf text so people dont read about it. On 14 January 2016 at 17:08, Bill Fischofer wrote: > Taking a look at thi

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCHv4 2/2] doc: update CONTRIBUTING and DEPENDENCIES files for images

Taking a look at this, we also have make rules for rtf, chm, xml, ps, and pdf output so this removal patch is somewhat bigger. I think I'd prefer to see that as a separate patch. This one really just cleaning up the image files and standardizing on svgs. I think a separate one to standardize on ht

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCHv4 2/2] doc: update CONTRIBUTING and DEPENDENCIES files for images

I think all at once with new subject like - remove all pdf support On 14 January 2016 at 15:35, Bill Fischofer wrote: > Sounds good. Do you want that as a v5 or should that be a separate patch? > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Mike Holmes > wrote: > >> The dependencies still talks about pd

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCHv4 2/2] doc: update CONTRIBUTING and DEPENDENCIES files for images

Sounds good. Do you want that as a v5 or should that be a separate patch? On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Mike Holmes wrote: > The dependencies still talks about pdfs which we dont really support now > for doxygen. > > We can opt at this point to completely remove all reference to pdf all > to

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCHv4 2/2] doc: update CONTRIBUTING and DEPENDENCIES files for images

The dependencies still talks about pdfs which we dont really support now for doxygen. We can opt at this point to completely remove all reference to pdf all together that to say we dont support it and in that case we need to fix the configure script to not look for latex and to remove the target d

[lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCHv4 2/2] doc: update CONTRIBUTING and DEPENDENCIES files for images

Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer --- CONTRIBUTING | 5 ++--- DEPENDENCIES | 7 ++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING b/CONTRIBUTING index 4ad964e..f6e3fc6 100644 --- a/CONTRIBUTING +++ b/CONTRIBUTING @@ -126,9 +126,8 @@ Code without a proper signoff cann