https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3426
--- Comment #5 from Bill Fischofer ---
OK, we can discuss whether this is something we'd like to add. There are more
issues surrounding Jumbogram support than just parsing since they can be up to
4GB in size. I'm not sure
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3426
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
---
I stumbled upon it as I was writing header parsing code for IPsec.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
I stumbled upon it as I was writing header parsing code for IPsec.
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3426
--- Comment #3 from Bill Fischofer ---
OK, we currently do not support Jumbograms. Such support could be added if
desired. Is there a specific requirement for this or is this more a
completeness issue?
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3426
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
---
Jumbograms
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3426
--- Comment #1 from Bill Fischofer ---
Are you referring to Jumbo frames (9K len) or "Jumbograms" (RFC 2675)? IPv6
Jumbo frames should have normal length fields. Jumbograms have lengths > 64K
and use a special option header.