On 10/16/2015 15:03, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote:
Maybe close should call stop implictely to avoid redundancy ?
Term => Close
Close => Stop
Looks like I mixed up something. There is only one patch from Petri:
[API-NEXT PATCH] api: pktio: improve pktio_start and stop documentation
which
Petri sent a patch for api which says that pktio has to be stopped.
I think you also need to send stop before close in that patch.
Maxim.
On 10/14/2015 10:53, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote:
There at still 3 loops with the same = 1, <=PKTIO_ENTRIES in the packet_io.c
file.
Can we keep this
Merged,
Maxim.
On 10/16/2015 15:03, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote:
Maybe close should call stop implictely to avoid redundancy ?
Term => Close
Close => Stop
On 10/16/2015 01:59 PM, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
Petri sent a patch for api which says that pktio has to be stopped.
I think you also
Maybe close should call stop implictely to avoid redundancy ?
Term => Close
Close => Stop
On 10/16/2015 01:59 PM, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> Petri sent a patch for api which says that pktio has to be stopped.
>
> I think you also need to send stop before close in that patch.
>
> Maxim.
>
> On
On 10/13/2015 20:05, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote:
Right now, pktio_term calls term on all pktio type but
some pktio might still be be opened. Although the user should
probably close its pktio before termintating the application,
it is safer to iterate on all pktio and close them in the
On 14 October 2015 at 10:53, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin
wrote:
> There at still 3 loops with the same = 1, <=PKTIO_ENTRIES in the
> packet_io.c file.
> Can we keep this patch this way and then send a new patch that fixes all
> these loops at once?
>
> Nicolas
>
>
Yes, I think
There at still 3 loops with the same = 1, <=PKTIO_ENTRIES in the packet_io.c
file.
Can we keep this patch this way and then send a new patch that fixes all these
loops at once?
Nicolas
On 10/14/2015 09:52 AM, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> On 10/14/2015 10:21, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote:
>>
>> On
On 10/14/2015 10:21, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote:
On 10/14/2015 08:48 AM, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
On 10/13/2015 20:05, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote:
Right now, pktio_term calls term on all pktio type but
some pktio might still be be opened. Although the user should
probably close its
On 10/14/2015 08:48 AM, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> On 10/13/2015 20:05, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote:
>> Right now, pktio_term calls term on all pktio type but
>> some pktio might still be be opened. Although the user should
>> probably close its pktio before termintating the application,
>> it
Right now, pktio_term calls term on all pktio type but
some pktio might still be be opened. Although the user should
probably close its pktio before termintating the application,
it is safer to iterate on all pktio and close them in the
pktio_term function.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas
10 matches
Mail list logo