Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: print backtrace on segfault and other related signals

2016-03-02 Thread Mike Holmes
On 25 February 2016 at 07:26, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > ping. Is that reasonable patch? This makes the test framework more dependant on Linux and the validation suite needs to be agnostic, so I have to vote no, but agree that we should improve things. > > > Maxim. > > > On 02/17/16 15:11, Maxim

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: print backtrace on segfault and other related signals

2016-02-25 Thread Maxim Uvarov
ping. Is that reasonable patch? Maxim. On 02/17/16 15:11, Maxim Uvarov wrote: If any test got segmentation fault it's better to print something useful for debug. That function is based on example code for TM. I hope it will help to see fails in CI where is not clear how to get core files. Sign

[lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: print backtrace on segfault and other related signals

2016-02-17 Thread Maxim Uvarov
If any test got segmentation fault it's better to print something useful for debug. That function is based on example code for TM. I hope it will help to see fails in CI where is not clear how to get core files. Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov --- test/validation/common/odp_cunit_common.c | 67 +