On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:20:23AM +0100, Stuart Haslam wrote:
>
>Yup, I too am not sure that it's a good idea to install tests via
>"make install", but that's what was being done before your change and it
>(kind of) worked.
Oh, hmmm.
>We do need some method of installing test binaries, to cope w
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 06:15:36PM +0200, Christophe Milard wrote:
> On 2 June 2015 at 11:31, Stuart Haslam wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:58:10PM +0200, Christophe Milard wrote:
> > > Module pktio now gets its own directory and create its own lib
> > > (currentely only containing its ex
On 2 June 2015 at 11:31, Stuart Haslam wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:58:10PM +0200, Christophe Milard wrote:
> > Module pktio now gets its own directory and create its own lib
> > (currentely only containing its executable)
> > Startup scripting stuff is just moved to the pktio directory bu
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:58:10PM +0200, Christophe Milard wrote:
> Module pktio now gets its own directory and create its own lib
> (currentely only containing its executable)
> Startup scripting stuff is just moved to the pktio directory but remains
> untouched
checkpatch complains about this
Module pktio now gets its own directory and create its own lib
(currentely only containing its executable)
Startup scripting stuff is just moved to the pktio directory but remains
untouched
at this stage (test is still ran from validation side)
Signed-off-by: Christophe Milard
---
configure.ac
