Re: [lng-odp] [PATCHv2 1/3] doc: implementers-guide: conditional tests

Good points. As long as we're disciplined about this I agree the cleaner syntax makes sense. Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Christophe Milard < christophe.mil...@linaro.org> wrote: > The implementers guide says: > "The general policy is

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCHv2 1/3] doc: implementers-guide: conditional tests

Merged, Maxim. On 01/25/2016 15:57, Bill Fischofer wrote: Good points. As long as we're disciplined about this I agree the cleaner syntax makes sense. Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Christophe

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCHv2 1/3] doc: implementers-guide: conditional tests

This seems like a reasonable addition, but we need to consider carefully what conditions are valid for skipping tests, otherwise it makes it too easy for ODP APIs to become optional. Can we include some guidelines here? Especially given that we have the ability to support platform-specific tests

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCHv2 1/3] doc: implementers-guide: conditional tests

The implementers guide says: "The general policy is that a full run of the validation suite (a "make check") must pass at all times. However a particular platform may have one or more test cases that are known to be unimplemented either during development or permanently, so to avoid these test

[lng-odp] [PATCHv2 1/3] doc: implementers-guide: conditional tests

Documentation on conditional test is added here, as it seemed to be missing Signed-off-by: Christophe Milard --- doc/implementers-guide/implementers-guide.adoc | 29 ++ 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) diff --git