Merged.
On 09/08/15 23:34, Bill Fischofer wrote:
Maxim: I believe this one should be ready to merge. I added my
reviewed to the v2 version of this patch last week.
Yes. Not it's good. I did not include it to 1.3 to not break anything
which we can miss.
Maxim.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:3
Maxim: I believe this one should be ready to merge. I added my reviewed to
the v2 version of this patch last week.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin <
nmo...@kalray.eu> wrote:
> ping ?
>
> On 09/01/2015 02:51 PM, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:50 AM,
ping ?
On 09/01/2015 02:51 PM, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin > wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin
>>
> Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer
>
>
>> ---
>> v3:
>> Packet for add_rem_data is now packet_len so we can add tail data when
>>
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin
>
Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer
> ---
> v3:
> Packet for add_rem_data is now packet_len so we can add tail data when
> segmentation is not supported
> v2:
> Patch cleanup based on B
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin
---
v3:
Packet for add_rem_data is now packet_len so we can add tail data when
segmentation is not supported
v2:
Patch cleanup based on Bill feedback
test/validation/packet/packet.c | 35 +++
1 file changed, 27 insert
