On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Maxim Uvarov
wrote:
>
>
> On 6 October 2017 at 22:26, Bill Fischofer
> wrote:
>
>> PR #225 [1] is a good example of the sort of packaging/distro problem ODP
>> wants to solve. DPDK currently requires special
On 6 October 2017 at 22:26, Bill Fischofer
wrote:
> PR #225 [1] is a good example of the sort of packaging/distro problem ODP
> wants to solve. DPDK currently requires special compile flags to determine
> the microarchitecture it's running on. As a result, Travis broke
PR #225 [1] is a good example of the sort of packaging/distro problem ODP
wants to solve. DPDK currently requires special compile flags to determine
the microarchitecture it's running on. As a result, Travis broke when they
deployed new test machines that had a different microarchitecture. To get
Hi Petri,
DPDK modules are not allowing DPDK to adapt to underlying architecture. It
is just pugable HW.
The DDF will deal with that.
The problem we need to solve is architecture adaptation. where the CORE of
the application changes. there is a single DPDK core with drivers. ODP has
different
We'll only got for rpm? deb packaging?
Regards
Ilias
On 6 October 2017 at 20:18, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/dpdk.git/tree/dpdk.spec
>
> On 6 October 2017 at 20:17, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 6
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/dpdk.git/tree/dpdk.spec
On 6 October 2017 at 20:17, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
>
>
> On 6 October 2017 at 20:05, Honnappa Nagarahalli <
> honnappa.nagaraha...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> Any experts on how is the packaging done for DPDK?
>>
On 6 October 2017 at 20:05, Honnappa Nagarahalli <
honnappa.nagaraha...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Any experts on how is the packaging done for DPDK?
>
>
./pkg/dpdk.spec ?
> On 6 October 2017 at 08:36, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> wrote:
> >> > No, I'm pointing
Any experts on how is the packaging done for DPDK?
On 6 October 2017 at 08:36, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
wrote:
>> > No, I'm pointing that the more there's common core SW, the more there
>> > are trade-offs and the less direct HW access == less
> > No, I'm pointing that the more there's common core SW, the more there
> > are trade-offs and the less direct HW access == less performance. For
> > optimal performance, the amount of common core SW is zero.
>
> Yes this is sort of the ideal but I doubt this type of installation
> will be
FI/Espoo) <petri.savolai...@nokia.com>
> Cc: Andriy Berestovskyy <andriy.berestovs...@caviumnetworks.com>; Ola
> Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@linaro.org>; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] generic core + HW specific drivers
>
>
>
> On W
FI/Espoo) <petri.savolai...@nokia.com>
> Cc: Andriy Berestovskyy <andriy.berestovs...@caviumnetworks.com>; Ola
> Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@linaro.org>; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] generic core + HW specific drivers
>
>
>
> On W
017 at 7:47 AM, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <
>> > petri.savolai...@nokia.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > -Original Message-
>> >> > From: Andriy Berestovskyy [mailto:Andriy.Berestovskyy@
>>
<ola.liljed...@linaro.org>; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] generic core + HW specific drivers
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
<mailto:petri.savolai...@nokia.com> wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Andriy Berestovskyy
>
t;> >>
>> >> On 4 October 2017 at 06:06, Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@linaro.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > The approach taken by Vulkan project:
>> >> > https://github.com/KhronosGroup/Vulkan-LoaderAndValidationLayers
> >> > -Original Message-
> >> > From: Andriy Berestovskyy [mailto:Andriy.Berestovskyy@
> caviumnetworks.com
> >> ]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2017 8:22 PM
> >> > To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <petri.savolai...@n
oach taken by Vulkan project:
> >> > https://github.com/KhronosGroup/Vulkan-LoaderAndValidationLayers/
> >> > blob/master/loader/LoaderAndLayerInterface.md
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> >> > <dmitry.ereminsol
t; > -Original Message-
>> > From: Andriy Berestovskyy [mailto:andriy.berestovs...@caviumnetworks.com
>> ]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2017 8:22 PM
>> > To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <petri.savolai...@nokia.com>;
>> Ola
>> > Li
8:22 PM
> > To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <petri.savolai...@nokia.com>;
> Ola
> > Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@linaro.org>; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> > Subject: Re: [lng-odp] generic core + HW specific drivers
> >
> > Hey,
> > Please see below.
&
;; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] generic core + HW specific drivers
>
> Hey,
> Please see below.
>
> On 03.10.2017 10:12, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
> > So, we should be able to deliver ODP as a set of HW independent and
> > HW specific
t; <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> > > On 03/10/17 11:12, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>> > >>> -----Original Message-
>> > >>> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf
>> Of
@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> > Ola
> > >>> Liljedahl
> > >>> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 8:47 PM
> > >>> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> > >>> Subject: [lng-odp] generic core + HW specific drivers
> > >&g
e-
> >>> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Ola
> >>> Liljedahl
> >>> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 8:47 PM
> >>> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> >>> Subject: [lng-odp] generic core + HW specific dri
ri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Ola
>>> Liljedahl
>>> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 8:47 PM
>>> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
>>> Subject: [l
On 03/10/17 11:12, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Ola
>> Liljedahl
>> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 8:47 PM
>> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
>>
1, 3 and 4. Those
> >>> modules
> >>> > may still be deployed as separate packages. The initial idea was to
> >>> split
> >>> > the implementation in more modules but it may not make that much
> sense
> >>> > after giving more tho
odp-linux required module that provides AF packet and other packetios;
>>> > depends on odp-core
>>> > - odp-ddf optional module that provides dynamic pluggable hardware
>>> support;
>>> > depends on odp-core
>>> > - odp- optional modules
orm, the rest is
>> entirely proprietary.
>>
>> The static and dynamic approaches are not mutually exclusive. I highly
>> recommend that the static (case 3 and 4) approach is driven by individual
>> members should they need it while we collectively solve the bro
modules but it may not make that much sense
>>> > after giving more thoughts. Additional native drivers and the DDF
>>> itself
>>> > may be considered as separate modules and also distributed as separate
>>> > packages.
>>> > So we would h
Hey,
Please see below.
On 03.10.2017 10:12, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
So, we should be able to deliver ODP as a set of HW independent and
HW specific packages (libraries). For example, minimal install would
include only odp, odp-linux and odp-test-suite, but when on arm64
erX,
>> > ThunderX/2, DPAA2...); depends on odp-core
>> >
>> > The odp- is derived from the current native SoC implementation
>> > but need to leverage odp-mbuf and the new mempool facilities to allow
>> > diversity of packetio to livetogether in a s
> > diversity of packetio to livetogether in a single platform, the rest is
> > entirely proprietary.
> >
> > The static and dynamic approaches are not mutually exclusive. I highly
> > recommend that the static (case 3 and 4) approach is driven by individual
> >
t; (case 1) deployment.
>
> Cheers
>
> FF
>
> On 3 October 2017 at 10:12, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <
> petri.savolai...@nokia.com> wrote:
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Beha
linaro.org] On Behalf Of Ola
> > Liljedahl
> > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 8:47 PM
> > To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> > Subject: [lng-odp] generic core + HW specific drivers
> >
> > olli@vubuntu:~$ dpkg --get-selections | grep xorg
> > xorg install
> > x
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Ola
> Liljedahl
> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 8:47 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] generic core + HW specific drivers
>
> olli@vubuntu:~$ dpkg
olli@vubuntu:~$ dpkg --get-selections | grep xorg
xorg install
xorg-docs-core install
xserver-xorg install
xserver-xorg-core install
xserver-xorg-input-all install
xserver-xorg-input-evdev install
xserver-xorg-input-libinput install
xserver-xorg-input-synaptics install
xserver-xorg-input-wacom
35 matches
Mail list logo