Thanks. I've opened Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3657
to track this.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:36 PM, gyanesh patra wrote:
> Hi,
> I am coming back with the same issue here. As the odp-dpdk is updated to
> the recent DPDK version inline with the ODP code
Hi,
I am coming back with the same issue here. As the odp-dpdk is updated to
the recent DPDK version inline with the ODP code base, now both ODP repo
and odp-dpdk repos stops working with mellanox interfaces. Please let me
know if this is a known issue. I tried to run with master branch,
With my initial testing, ODP-DPDK is working perfectly with mellanox
drivers.
Thank you
P Gyanesh Kumar Patra
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Maxim Uvarov
wrote:
> Nice to see it working. I think we did not yet tested it with Mellanox
> drivers.
>
> For linux-generic
This is good news. I was wondering if it was in the pipeline. Thank you
P Gyanesh Kumar Patra
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Francois Ozog
wrote:
> ODP2.0 should allow ODP to leverage directly libiverbs from a native ODP
> pktio without DPDK layer.
> Mellanox has
ODP2.0 should allow ODP to leverage directly libiverbs from a native ODP
pktio without DPDK layer.
Mellanox has created a userland framework based on libiverbs while we try
to promote an extension of Mediated Device (vfio-mdev).
FF
On 9 November 2017 at 14:18, Maxim Uvarov
Nice to see it working. I think we did not yet tested it with Mellanox
drivers.
For linux-generic refer to .travis.yaml or ./scripts/build-pktio-dpdk
scripts. Also all required steps are in README.
Maxim.
On 11/09/17 14:47, Elo, Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
> Hi Gyanesh,
>
> Pretty much
Hi Gyanesh,
Pretty much the same steps should also work with odp linux-generic. The main
difference is configure script. With linux-generic you use
'--with-dpdk-path=' option and optionally --enable-dpdk-zero-copy
flag. The supported dpdk version is v17.08.
-Matias
> On 9 Nov 2017, at
Hi Maxim,
Thanks for the help. I managed to figure out the configuration error and it
works fine for "ODP-DPDK". The MLX5 pmd was not included properly.
But regarding "ODP" repo (not odp-dpdk), do i need to follow any steps to
be able to use MLX ???
P Gyanesh Kumar Patra
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at
- where to set CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_MLX5_PMD ? I believe in DPDK we set it
whilie compiling. How to set it for ODP??
- with mellanox NICs, it is not required to explicitly bind the interface
to dpdk. I can use portID "0,1" with dpdk example. Is it the same way to
specify with ODP-DPDK l2fwd example
On 11/08/17 19:32, gyanesh patra wrote:
> I am not sure what you mean. Can you please elaborate?
>
> As i mentioned before I am able to run dpdk examples. Hence the drivers
> are available and working fine.
> I configured ODP & ODP-DPDK with "LDFLAGS=-libverbs" and compiled to
> work with
I am not sure what you mean. Can you please elaborate?
As i mentioned before I am able to run dpdk examples. Hence the drivers are
available and working fine.
I configured ODP & ODP-DPDK with "LDFLAGS=-libverbs" and compiled to work
with mellanox. I followed the same while compiling dpdk too.
Is
is Mellanox pmd compiled in?
Maxim.
On 11/08/17 17:58, gyanesh patra wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to run ODP & ODP-DPDK examples on our server with mellanox 100G
> NICs. I am using the odp_l2fwd example. While running the example, I am
> facing some issues.
> -> When I run "ODP" example using the
Hi,
I am trying to run ODP & ODP-DPDK examples on our server with mellanox 100G
NICs. I am using the odp_l2fwd example. While running the example, I am
facing some issues.
-> When I run "ODP" example using the if names given by kernel as
arguments, I am not getting enough throughput.(the value is
13 matches
Mail list logo